Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Brewington, 601 So. 2d 656.

105 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Cortney Fitzgerald La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2025
State Of Louisiana v. John Jacob Jenkins La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2023
State of Louisiana v. Jason Ray Craft La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
The purpose behind the res gestae exception is to allow the State to “complete the story of the crime on trial by proving its immediate context of happenings near in time and place.” (La.
State Of Louisiana v. Roderick Hackett La. 2022
The purpose behind the res gestae exception is to allow the State to “complete the story of the crime on trial by proving its immediate context of happenings near in time and place.” (La.
State of Louisiana v. William Gary Ryder La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
art. 404(B), “when it is related and intertwined with the charged offense to such an extent that the state could not have accurately presented its case without reference to it.”
State Of Louisiana v. David H. Brown (Parish of Lafourche) Convictions Affirmed; Death Sentences Reversed; Case Remanded For … La. 2021
art. 404(B), “when it is related and intertwined with the charged offense to such an extent that the state could not have accurately presented its case without reference to it.” (La.
State Of Louisiana v. Sandra Elizabeth Gaines La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2020
State Of Louisiana v. Christopher Ard La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2020
State Of Louisiana v. Ollie Montrell Selders, Jr. La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
3d at 5 ( citing State a Brewington, ( La.
State of Louisiana v. Aaron Orlando Richards -Aka- Aaron Richards La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
State v. Richards 247 So. 3d 878 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
State v. Trung Le 243 So. 3d 637 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
State v. Kirsh 273 So. 3d 1225 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
In State v. Brewington , , 657 (La.1992), the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: This court has approved the admission of other crimes evidence when it is related and intertwined with the charged offense to such an extent that the state could not have accurately presented its case without reference to it.
State v. Small 189 So. 3d 1129 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
It is clear that the witnesses’ statements were not introduced for the purpose of depicting Small as a drug dealer — or to accuse him of another “bad act” or crime — but merely to “complete the story of the crime on trial by proving its immediate context of happenings near in time and place.” -57 (La.1992).
State v. Jones 182 So. 3d 251 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
The res géstae doctrine holds that otherwise inadmissible evidence (hearsay, for example) may be admissible "when it is related and intertwined with the charged offense to such an extent that the state could not have accurately presented its case without reference to it.” State v. Colomb, 98-2813, p. 3 (La.10/1/99)
State v. Scott 184 So. 3d 2 La. 2015
The other crimes had to be “intertwined with the charged offense to such an extent that the state could not have accurately presented its case without reference to it.” see also State v. Odenbaugh, 10-0268, p. 53 (La.12/6/11), .
State v. Taylor 123 So. 3d 256 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Garcia 108 So. 3d 1 La. 2012
(“This court has approved the admission of other crimes evidence when it is related and intertwined with the charged offense to such an extent that the state could not have accurately presented its case without reference to it....
State v. Preston 103 So. 3d 525 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
State v. Massey 97 So. 3d 13 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
The evidence regarding defendant’s 9 mm handgun was not offered for the purpose of depicting defendant as a bad person but merely as res gestae, to “complete the story of the crime on trial by proving its immediate context of happenings near in time and place.” -57 (La.1992).
State v. Marlowe 81 So. 3d 944 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
art. 404(B), “when it is related and intertwined with the charged offense to such an extent that the state could not have accurately presented its case without reference to it.”
State of Louisiana v. Michael Bushnell Sr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
art. 404(B), “when it is related and intertwined with the charged offense to such an extent that the state could not have accurately presented its case without reference to it.”
State v. Odenbaugh 82 So. 3d 215 La. 2011
State of Louisiana v. Charles D. Washington La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
Again, this court held the trial court did not err in permitting the prosecution to admit evidence which tended to show the accused possessed crack cocaine and a .357 caliber pistol “three hours after the victim was last seen alive in his presence and less than two hours before her death” because the evidence, “fo
State v. Law 46 So. 3d 764 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
State v. Davis 30 So. 3d 201 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
art. 404(B), “when it is related and intertwined with the charged offense to such an extent that the state could not have accurately presented its case without reference to it.”
State of Louisiana v. Theron J. Chaisson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
Again, this court held the trial court did not err in permitting the prosecution to admit evidence which tended to show the accused possessed crack cocaine and a .357 caliber pistol “three hours after the victim was last seen alive in his presence and less than two hours before her death” because the evidence, “fo
State v. Chaisson 20 So. 3d 1166 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Again, this court held the trial court did not err in permitting the prosecution to admit evidence which tended to show the accused possessed crack cocaine and a .357 caliber pistol “three hours after the victim was last seen alive in his presence and less than two hours before her death” because the evidence, “fo
State v. Harry 11 So. 3d 1244 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
The Louisiana Supreme Court has long approved of the introduction of other crimes evidence, "when it is related and intertwined with the charged offense to such an extent that the state could not have accurately presented its case without reference to it[,]" (La.
State of Louisiana v. Francis Loncar La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
art. 404(B), “when it is related and intertwined with the charged offense to such an extent that the state could not have accurately presented its case without reference to it.”
State v. LONCAR 970 So. 2d 113 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
State of Louisiana v. Todd Vincent Edwards La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
14 the supreme court stated: This court has approved the admission of other crimes evidence when it is related and intertwined with the charged offense to such an extent that the state could not have accurately presented its case without reference to it.
State v. Edwards 963 So. 2d 419 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
the supreme court stated: This court has approved the admission of other crimes evidence when it is related and intertwined with the charged offense to such an extent that the state could not have accurately presented its case without reference to it.
State of Louisiana v. Jarvis Keon Carey La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
art. 404(B), “when it is related and intertwined with the charged offense to such an extent that the state could not have accurately presented its case without reference to it.”
State v. Grant 954 So. 2d 823 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
State of Louisiana v. Mitchell Pat Mayeux La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
State v. Mayeux 949 So. 2d 520 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
State v. Colomb, 98-2813, p. 3 (La.10/1/99), ().
State of Louisiana v. Robert S. Willis La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
State v. Willis 915 So. 2d 365 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
Integral act evidence is evidence that is "`related and intertwined with the charged offense to such an extent that the state could not have accurately presented its case without reference to it.'" State v. Colomb, 98-2813, p. 3 (La.10/1/99), ().
State of Louisiana v. Arthur Major III La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
State v. Major 898 So. 2d 548 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
State v. Brown 871 So. 2d 1240 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2004
Again, this court held the trial court did not err in permitting the prosecution to admit evidence which tended to show the accused possessed crack cocaine and a.357 caliber pistol "three hours after the victim was last seen alive in his presence and less than two hours before her death" because the evidence, "for
State v. Phillips 853 So. 2d 675 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
State v. Shaw 850 So. 2d 868 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
State v. Joseph 854 So. 2d 914 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
State v. Mandosia 842 So. 2d 1252 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
State v. Lee 844 So. 2d 970 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
: This court has approved the admission of other crimes evidence when it is related and intertwined with the charged offense to such an extent that the state could not have accurately presented its case without reference to it.
State v. Hall 843 So. 2d 488 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
4 Cir. 6/18/97) , ; (La.
State v. Taylor 838 So. 2d 729 La. 2003
Again, this court held the trial court did not err in permitting the prosecution to admit evidence which tended to show the accused possessed crack cocaine and a .357 caliber pistol "three hours after the victim was last seen alive in his presence and less than two hours before her death" because the evidence, "fo
State v. Juarbe 824 So. 2d 1240 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
4 Cir. 6/18/97) , ; (La.