Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Faucheaux v. Terrebonne Consol. Government, 615 So. 2d 289.

198 citing documents.

Falcone v. Touro Infirmary 129 So. 3d 641 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Carl Ravey v. Rockworks, LLC La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
Ravey v. Rockworks, LLC 111 So. 3d 1187 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Tracey D. Kulka v. Shag II, Inc. D/B/A the Bulldog Pool Hall" " La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
Kulka v. Shag 100 So. 3d 412 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Ponceti v. First Lake Properties, Inc. 93 So. 3d 1251 La. 2012
Peterson v. Gibraltar Savings and Loan, 98-1601, 98-1609, p. 7 (La.5/18/99)
Carl Jones, Sr. v. Centerpoint Energy Entex La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
Jones v. Centerpoint Energy Entex 66 So. 3d 539 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
Brumfield v. Lind 54 So. 3d 769 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
(citing Peterson v. Gibraltar Savings & Loan, 98-1601, 1609, p. 7 (La.5/18/99), ; ).
Carrier v. City of Amite 50 So. 3d 1247 La. 2010
Peterson v. Gibraltar Savings and Loan, 98-1601, 98-1609, p. 7 (La.5/18/99), *1249
Barbara Raymond v. Government Employees Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
Gov’t, the supreme court, in analogizing a public body’s duty regarding a gate on a canal, discussed the element of knowledge as follows: The court of appeal erroneously determined, however, that the parish had no duty to provide warnings in this instance because it was not proved that th
Raymond v. Government Employees Insurance 40 So. 3d 1179 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Gov’t, the supreme court, in analogizing a public body’s duty regarding a gate on a canal, discussed the element of knowledge as follows: The court of appeal erroneously determined, however, that the parish had no duty to provide warnings in this instance because it was not proved that the parish had knowledg
Dupre & Son Floor Covering, Inc. v. City of Iota La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
Dupre & Son Floor Covering, Inc. v. City of Iota 36 So. 3d 1117 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
Carleen Willis v. Rapides Parish Communications District A/K/A 911" " La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
Peterson v. Gibraltar Savings and Loan, 98-1601, 98-1609, p. 7 (La.5/18/99)
Willis v. RAPIDES PARISH COMMUNICATIONS DISTRICT 30 So. 3d 1186 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
Peterson v. Gibraltar Savings and Loan, 98-1601, 98-1609, p. 7 (La.5/18/99)
Jeffery Alexander Arkell v. Lafayette City-Parish Consolidated Government La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
Peterson v. Gibraltar Savings & Loan, 98-1601, 98-1609, p. 7 (La.5/18/99)
Arkell v. Lafayette City-Parish Consolidated Government 28 So. 3d 1248 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Peterson v. Gibraltar Savings & Loan, 98-1601, 98-1609, p. 7 (La.5/18/99)
Randy J. Gary v. Moncla Well Services, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
Gary v. Moncla Well Service 21 So. 3d 1101 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Government, Brow v. Allstate Indem.
Dennis v. Wiley 22 So. 3d 189 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Rando v. Anco Insulations Inc. 16 So. 3d 1065 La. 2009
Hendrickson v. Guillory 15 So. 3d 256 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Faucheaux v. Terrebonne Consolidated, Government, -294 (La.1993).
Joyce Marie Perry v. Capital One, N.A. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
Peterson v. Gibraltar Savings and Loan, 98-1601, 98-1609, p. 7 (La.5/18/99)
Perry v. Capital One, N. A. 1 So. 3d 794 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
Peterson v. Gibraltar Savings and Loan, 98-1601, 98-1609, p. 7 (La.5/18/99), ; (La.
Juan Flores v. Alco Builders, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
Flores v. ALCO BUILDERS, INC. 996 So. 2d 1285 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
Lamonteanson Chenevert v. William Earl Hilton, Sheriff La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
Chenevert v. Hilton 978 So. 2d 1078 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
Wilson v. Town of Mamou 972 So. 2d 461 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
Woodrow Wilson, Jr. v. Town of Mamou La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
Bellsouth Telecom. v. Eustis Engineering 974 So. 2d 749 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
Century Ready Mix Corp. v. Boyte 968 So. 2d 893 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
Vad Daotheuang v. El Paso Production Oil & Gas Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Daotheuang v. El Paso Production Oil & Gas 940 So. 2d 752 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Carl Harris Hesse v. Champ Service Line La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Hesse v. CHAMP SERVICE LINE 933 So. 2d 247 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Theriot v. Lasseigne, 93-2661 (La.7/5/94)
Lemann v. Essen Lane Daiquiris, Inc. 923 So. 2d 627 La. 2006
Peterson v. Gibraltar Savings and Loan, 98-1601, 98-1609, p. 7 (La.5/18/99)
Bujol v. Entergy Services, Inc. 922 So. 2d 1113 La. 2006
Faucheaux v. Terrebonne Consolidated Government, 92-0930 (La.2/22/93), .
Henry v. Barlow 901 So. 2d 1207 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
Randy James Henry, Etc. v. Danny L. Barlow La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
Stephenson v. Commercial Travelers Ins. 893 So. 2d 180 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
Gov't, (citations omitted), stating: The scope of protection inquiry asks whether the enunciated rule extends to or is intended to protect this plaintiff from this type of harm arising in this manner.
Pamela Ferrera Stephenson v. Commercial Travelers Mutual Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
Gov't, (citations omitted), stating: 5 The scope of protection inquiry asks whether the enunciated rule extends to or is intended to protect this plaintiff from this type of harm arising in this manner.
Smith v. Lafayette Parish Sheriff's Dept. 874 So. 2d 863 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
Theriot v. Lasseigne, 93-2661 (La.7/5/94)
Susan Smith v. Lafayette Parish Sheriff's Dept. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
Theriot v. Lasseigne, 93-2661 (La.7/5/94)
Billy Brown v. Entergy Corporation La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
Gov’t, (citations omitted), summarizes the test for legal cause : The scope of protection inquiry asks whether the enunciated rule extends to or is intended to protect this plaintiff from this type of harm arising in this manner.
Brown v. Entergy Corp. 870 So. 2d 422 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
Gov’t, (citations omitted), summarizes the test for legal cause: The scope of protection inquiry asks whether the enunciated rule extends to or is intended to protect this plaintiff from this type of harm arising in this manner.
Thomas v. SISTERS OF CHARITY OF INCAR. WORD 870 So. 2d 390 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
Government, where the defendant was found negligent for a failure to warn of a perilous condition through adequate signage, the court implemented a duty-risk analysis.
Shelby Schweitzer v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
Schweitzer v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 861 So. 2d 747 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003