Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Benoit v. Capitol Mfg. Co., 617 So. 2d 477.

67 citing documents.

Efren Galindo v. Jose Castillo, J&T Poultry Services, LLC, and House of Raeford Farms of Louisiana, L.L.C. La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2025
Eugene Latour, II v. Emanee Q. Brock, Et Al. La. 2023
Gregory Jones, Jr. v. the Boot Bar & Grill, C. Napco, Inc., Craig Napoli, Nancy Napoli, Aline Napoli, … La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2022
Kerry Bucklin v. James Stewart La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2022
Marion Felps v. Landmark Event Staffing Services, Inc., Redwood Fire and Casualty Insurance Company and John H. Williams La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2022
Julie Lowe and Matthew Lowe v. Old American Indemnity Company, Terrell Mendenhall, American Alternative Insurance Corporation, and Bossier … La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2022
Murphy J. Painter, Sr. v. Dustin Clouatre, Hughes Insurance Services, LLC, Pelican Post News, L.L.C., Wade Petite, Ricky … La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2022
Robert James Lee Guidry v. Worknet 2000, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
Marco Buckley, as the Representative of the Minor J.B. v. Tangipahoa Parish School System La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2021
2d 205, 211; and whether to close a workplace door to maintain a comfortable temperature, - 78 ( La.
Monica D. Duran v. Allmerica Financial Benefit Insurance Company, The MER Rouge State Bank, Louisiana Farm Bureau Mutual … La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2020
Co., Winzer v. Richards, supra.
Stanley R. Palowsky, III v. W. Brandon Cork, Anthony White, OHC Services, L.L.C. and Alternative Environmental Solutions, Inc. La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2020
Wade Conner v. Klarc Lemelle La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2020
Kathleen Edigo and David Edigo v. Otis Elevator Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
Higgins v. Williams Energy Partners, L.P. 240 So. 3d 207 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
Cf. Benoit v. Capitol Manufacturing Company , (La.
Loya v. Lucas 201 So. 3d 928 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Robinson v. Ky Quang Nguyen 201 So. 3d 922 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Garcia v. Lewis 197 So. 3d 738 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
Co., Gardner v. Craft, 48,861 (La.App.
Winzer v. Richards 185 So. 3d 876 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
Co., Black v. Johnson, supra.
Black v. Johnson 137 So. 3d 170 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Carnes v. Wilson 118 So. 3d 1275 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
Kenneth Dale Kelly, Et Ux. v. Boise Building Solutions La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
an employee of the defendant was injured when he got into a fight with a co-employee at work over whether the rear door to their work area should be opened or closed.
Kelly v. Boise Building Solutions 92 So. 3d 965 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
an employee of the defendant was injured when he got into a fight with a co-employee at work over whether the rear door to their work area should be opened or closed.
Nakia Edmond v. Pathfinder Energy Services, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
Edmond v. PATHFINDER ENERGY SERVICES, INC. 73 So. 3d 424 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
two workers got into a fight at a manufacturing facility because of a difference of opinion between the co-employees as to whether the back door to the facility should remain open during a cold spell.
Irwin v. Rubens 75 So. 3d 952 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
Truell Holloway v. City of Oberlin La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
Holloway v. City of Oberlin 21 So. 3d 1063 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
In that regard, wherein the supreme court reversed a decision of this court to affirm the trial court’s dismissal of an action brought by an employee against his employer and a co-employee seeking to recover damages from a battery inflicted on him by the co-employee.
Tonia Sellers, Etc. v. Rapides Parish School Board La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
Co., Orgeron v. McDonald, 93-1353 (La.
T.S. v. Rapides Parish School Board 11 So. 3d 628 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Co., Orgeron v. McDonald, 93-1353 (La.7/5/94), .
Smith v. Babin 966 So. 2d 1245 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
Latiolais v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTO INS. CO. 949 So. 2d 455 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Hilda Latiolais v. State Farm Mutual Auto ins.co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
“The scope of employment test examines the employment- related risk of injury.”
Shannon Suarez v. Lp Gaming Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
The relation between “course and scope” (quoting Lisonbee v. Chicago Mill & Lumber Co., ), as follows: “A strong showing by the claimant with reference to the arise-out-of requirement may compensate for a relatively weak showing on the during-course-of requirement, or vice versa.”
Bourgeois v. Curry 921 So. 2d 1001 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
Co., LeBrane v. Lewis, supra.
Bates v. Caruso 881 So. 2d 758 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2004
Stacy v. Minit Oil Change, Inc. 874 So. 2d 384 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
Smith v. Lafayette Parish Sheriff's Dept. 874 So. 2d 863 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
Susan Smith v. Lafayette Parish Sheriff's Dept. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
Sanborn v. Methodist Behavioral Resources Partnership 866 So. 2d 299 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
Cager v. Williams 861 So. 2d 239 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
Menson v. Taylor 849 So. 2d 836 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
(imposing vicarious liability on an employer where two co-employees fought over whether a door to the workplace should be left open because of the temperature; the court found the intentional act was employment-rooted where the temperature of the workplace was an employment issue); LeBrane v. Lewis, supra (i
Swartz v. McNabb 830 So. 2d 1093 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
McLin v. Industrial Specialty Contractors, Inc. 818 So. 2d 947 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
Distinguished Guy v. Mitchell 810 So. 2d 1245 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
Wearrien v. Viverette 803 So. 2d 297 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
two workers became embroiled in a dispute over whether the rear door to the work place should be open or closed.
Lamonte v. Premier Sales, Inc. 776 So. 2d 493 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
Co., the court set out the jurisprudence interpreting this article, which involves consideration of two factors.
Lyons v. Bechtel Corp. 788 So. 2d 34 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
Dickerson v. Piccadilly Restaurants, Inc. 785 So. 2d 842 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
is cited by both parties in brief.
Griffin v. Kmart Corp. 776 So. 2d 1226 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
Eichelberger v. Sidney 771 So. 2d 863 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
Second, rehearing granted in part (3/13/93), two co-workers were on break and got into an argument over whether to leave the door open or closed for reasons of temperature.

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by