Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Youn v. Maritime Overseas Corp., 623 So. 2d 1257.

1628 citing documents.

Linda Moore v. Safeway Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
The appellate court’s first inquiry should be “whether the award for the particular injuries and their effects under the particular circumstances on the particular injured person is a clear abuse of the ‘much discretion’ of the trier of fact.” Youn [v. Maritime Overseas Corp., cert.
Gurley v. Encompass Insurance Co. of America 985 So. 2d 299 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
Gurley v. ENCOMPASS INS. CO. OF AMERICA 985 So. 2d 299 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
Angelo Goutro v. F. G. Sullivan, Jr., Contractor, LLC La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
and confirmed in Youn v. Maritime Overseas, Corp., cert.
Goutro v. Sullivan 986 So. 2d 673 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
and confirmed in Youn v. Maritime Overseas, Corp., cert.
Lee v. Hartford Ins. Co. of Midwest 984 So. 2d 905 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
MacK v. Wiley 991 So. 2d 479 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
Bennett v. LOUISIANA FARM BUREAU CAS. INS. 983 So. 2d 966 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
D'AMBROSIA v. Lang 985 So. 2d 800 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
Mayeux v. ROCKY & CARLO, INC. 984 So. 2d 177 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
Tallulah Const. v. Ne La Delta Development 982 So. 2d 225 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
4 Cir. 5/16/07), ("[a]n appellate court's initial inquiry in reviewing a general damage award is whether the particular effects of the particular injuries on the particular plaintiff are such that there has been an abuse of the discretion vested in the trier of fact")().
Bellard v. American Cent. Ins. Co. 980 So. 2d 654 La. 2008
Lewis v. STATE, MEDICAL CENTER OF LOUISIANA 983 So. 2d 231 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
Stewart v. Ice 982 So. 2d 928 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
Oliver v. IMPERIAL FIRE AND CAS. INS. CO. 983 So. 2d 172 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
Bouquet v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 978 So. 2d 326 La. 2008
McCann v. CONTAINER PRODUCTS CORPORATION OF NORTH CAROLINA 978 So. 2d 1256 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
Matthews v. MacK 978 So. 2d 1258 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
Gerald v. Gomez 978 So. 2d 1257 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
RIVERSIDE TRANSPORTATION INC. v. Burke 978 So. 2d 1261 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
Arias v. Stolthaven New Orleans, LLC 980 So. 2d 791 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
Cone v. National Emergency Services, Inc., 99-0934, p. 8 (La.10/29/99), ().
Parfait v. Transocean Offshore, Inc. 980 So. 2d 634 La. 2008
Forbes v. Cockerham 985 So. 2d 86 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
Jessie Leary, III v. State Farm Mutual Auto. Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
2 In considering these assignments of error, cert.
Lynkeith Zandel James v. Scott Perry, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
Leary v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. 978 So. 2d 1094 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
*1098 In considering these assignments of error, cert.
James v. Perry 977 So. 2d 311 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
Johnson v. MURPHY EXPLORATION AND PROD. CO. 980 So. 2d 745 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
and Adler v. American National Property and Casualty Co., 99-3182 (La.App.
Dufrene v. Gautreau Family, LLC 980 So. 2d 68 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
Lewis v. FAMILY DOLLAR STORE 3988 977 So. 2d 304 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
Thomas v. Sheridan 977 So. 2d 303 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
Bittner v. Scott 980 So. 2d 5 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
Ursin v. Russell 979 So. 2d 554 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
Johnson v. Orleans Parish School Bd. 975 So. 2d 698 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
Woolfolk v. TRISM, INC. 976 So. 2d 216 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
More recently, regarding this constitutional appellate review of fact in civil cases, La, Const, art. 5, § 10, (La.
Hager v. STATE, EX REL. DOTD 978 So. 2d 454 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
Wainwright v. Fontenot, 00-0492, p. 6 (La.10/17/00), ; cert.
Miller v. Lammico 973 So. 2d 693 La. 2008
Co., (the fact finder's discretion in awarding general damages is vast and should rarely be disturbed); Reck v. Stevens.
Hager v. State ex rel. Department of Transportation & Development 978 So. 2d 454 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
Wainwright v. Fontenot, 00-0492, p. 6 (La.10/17/00), ; cert.
Hebert v. Rapides Parish Police Jury 974 So. 2d 635 La. 2008
Mindful that in quantum determinations, cert.
Sher v. Lafayette Ins. Co. 973 So. 2d 39 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
Bouquet v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 978 So. 2d 447 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
Doe v. East Baton Rouge Parish School Bd. 978 So. 2d 426 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
SIGNAL v. Anderson 973 So. 2d 933 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
Locke v. Young 973 So. 2d 831 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
LeBlanc v. DOTD 974 So. 2d 703 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
Orellana v. LOUISIANA CITIZENS PROP. INS. 972 So. 2d 1252 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
Coghlan v. Smith 971 So. 2d 1197 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
Rosemary Waters v. Brookshire Grocery Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
The standard for an appellate review of damages was established in -4- and confirmed in Youn v. Maritime Overseas, Corp., cert.
Waters v. Brookshire Grocery Co. 969 So. 2d 1287 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
and confirmed in Youn v. Maritime Overseas, Corp., (La.
Hanchett v. State 977 So. 2d 78 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007