Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Youn v. Maritime Overseas Corp., 623 So. 2d 1257.

1628 citing documents.

Marcus Ryan v. Zurich American Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
Annie Mae Nunez v. Michael I. Tribe La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
In considering whether an award of general damages is excessive or inadequate, (La.1993), cert.
Nunez v. Tribe 966 So. 2d 170 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
In considering whether an award of general damages is excessive or inadequate, , (La.1993), cert.
Ryan v. Zurich American Ins. Co. 970 So. 2d 42 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
Kourtney Phillips v. Cecilia Osmun La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
Importantly, on review, an appellate court should rarely disturb an award of general damages because “the discretion vested in the trier of fact is ‘great,’ and even vast.” cert.
Dawn Jones v. Robert Martinez La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
Johnson v. Castleberry 968 So. 2d 352 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
Jones v. Martinez 967 So. 2d 1205 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
Phillips v. Osmun 967 So. 2d 1209 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
Ricks v. City of Shreveport 968 So. 2d 863 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
Id.; Hae Woo Youn v. Maritime Overseas Corp., 92-3017 (La.9/3/93), , cert.
John E. Beard, Et Ux. v. Coregis Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
As such, “the role of an appellate court in reviewing general damages is not to decide what it considers to be an appropriate award, but rather to review the exercise of discretion by the trier of fact.”
Fox v. Layton 968 So. 2d 302 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
Beard v. Coregis Ins. Co. 968 So. 2d 278 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
Hornot v. Cardenas 968 So. 2d 789 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
The standard for appellate court review of a (La.
Lee J. Stagg v. National Automotive Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
As such, “the role of an appellate court in reviewing general damages is not to decide what it considers to be an appropriate award, but rather to review the exercise of discretion by the trier of fact.”
Estate of Derrick Francis v. City of Rayne La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
Estate of Francis v. City of Rayne 966 So. 2d 1105 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
Terrance v. Dow Chemical Co. 971 So. 2d 1058 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
McLEON v. VULCAN CHEMICALS 962 So. 2d 1233 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
McCain v. Howell 971 So. 2d 323 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
Rideau v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. 970 So. 2d 564 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
Green v. Nunley 963 So. 2d 486 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
Parfait v. Transocean Offshore, Inc. 992 So. 2d 465 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
Steen v. PROFESSIONAL LIAB. INS. CO. OF AM. 962 So. 2d 470 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
Ronald E. Corkern, III v. R. Allen Smith La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
Each case is different, and the adequacy or inadequacy of the award should be determined by the facts or circumstances particular to the case under consideration.” cert.
Corkern v. Smith 960 So. 2d 1152 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
Nora Miller, Et Vir v. Lammico La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
Miller v. Lammico 958 So. 2d 775 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
Ambrose v. McLaney 959 So. 2d 529 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
Earls v. McDowell 960 So. 2d 242 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
Hogan v. Morgan 960 So. 2d 1024 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
Brown v. Schwegmann 958 So. 2d 721 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
Kaiser v. Hardin 953 So. 2d 802 La. 2007
Cascio v. Downing 957 So. 2d 795 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
Further, we find that the trial court's award of $60,000 for Mr. Cascio's disfigurement and pain and suffering is not "beyond that which a reasonable trier of fact could assess for the effects of the particular injury to the particular plaintiff under the particular circumstances," (La.
Robert Butch Trost, Sr. v. Donald O'Connor La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
“The initial inquiry is whether the award for the particular injuries and their effects under the particular circumstances on the particular injured person is a clear abuse of the ‘much discretion’ of the trier of fact.” cert.
Trost v. O'CONNOR 955 So. 2d 246 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
Pena v. Delchamps, Inc. 960 So. 2d 988 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
Richard v. BD. OF SUPER. OF LA. STATE UNIV. 960 So. 2d 953 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
Oden v. Gales 960 So. 2d 114 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
Tremblay v. Allstate Insurance Company 955 So. 2d 700 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
Jacobs v. City of Marksville 953 So. 2d 139 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
J. D. Jacobs v. City of Marksville La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
Shamoindra Manning v. Edgar G. Barrilleaux La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
Manning v. Barrilleaux 952 So. 2d 919 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
Pomier v. Moreland 951 So. 2d 486 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
Waddles v. LaCour 950 So. 2d 937 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
Connie Mouhot v. Twelfth Street Baptist Church La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
Holly Jordan v. Safeway Ins. Co. of Louisiana La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
With regard to Mr. Husband’s complaint concerning the award of general damages, we note that “the discretion vested in the trier of fact is ‘great,’ and even vast, so that an appellate court should rarely disturb an award of general damages.” cert.
John Pomier v. Robert Moreland La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
Donald Frank v. Josie Frank La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
Our review of the trial court’s cert.