Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Youn v. Maritime Overseas Corp., 623 So. 2d 1257.
-
Christal Suire v. Lcs Corrections Services, Inc.
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: this Court commented on appellate review of general damage awards and on the “much discretion” in fixing damages accorded to trial courts by La.Civ.Code art. 1934(3)(1870).
- Clayton v. Republic Vanguard Ins. Co. 929 So. 2d 811 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
-
Suire v. LCS Corrections Services, Inc.
930 So. 2d 221
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: this Court commented on appellate *226 review of general damage awards and on the "much discretion" in fixing damages accorded to trial courts by La.
- Phyllis Green v. Edwin Spriggs La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
- Green v. Spriggs 930 So. 2d 1052 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
- Allen v. Brookshire Grocery Co. 927 So. 2d 693 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
- Williams v. Roberts 930 So. 2d 121 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
- Joseph Lionel Melancon v. Lafayette Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
- Melancon v. Lafayette Ins. Co. 926 So. 2d 693 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
-
Harris v. DeBrueys
926 So. 2d 627
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
Miller [v. Clout], 03-0091 at p. 7, 857 So.2d [458] at 463 [ (La.2003) ]
-
Rico v. Sewerage & Water Board of New Orleans
929 So. 2d 143
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
The standard for appellate court review of a trial court’s
- Phipps v. Allstate Ins. Co. 924 So. 2d 1081 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
- Laborde v. St. James Place Apartments 928 So. 2d 643 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
- Wanda Baker Smith v. the Municipality of Ferriday La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
- Smith v. Municipality of Ferriday 922 So. 2d 1222 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
- Raspanti v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. 922 So. 2d 631 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
- Nelson v. City of Shreveport 921 So. 2d 1111 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
- Nelson v. City of Shreveport 921 So. 2d 1111 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
- Garcia v. Furnace and Tube Service, Inc. 921 So. 2d 205 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
- Robinson v. Tolbert 920 So. 2d 346 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
- James E. Viviano, Et Ux. v. Progressive Security Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
- Viviano v. Progressive SEC. Ins. Co. 920 So. 2d 313 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
- Raines v. Columbia Lakeland Medical Center 923 So. 2d 170 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
-
Aaron Smith, by Next of Friend v. Alexandria Coca Cola Bottling Co., Ltd.
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
The standard of review to determine whether a cert.
- Nestor v. LA. UNIV. HEALTH SCIENCES CENTER 917 So. 2d 1273 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
-
Gerard Simon and Monica Simon v. Francois Lacoste
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
5 Maritime Overseas Corp.
-
Smith v. Alexandria Coca Cola Bottling Co.
918 So. 2d 522
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
The standard of review to determine whether a ce rt.
- Simon v. Lacoste 918 So. 2d 1102 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
-
Ainsworth v. Anderson
920 So. 2d 270
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
Youn v. Maritime Overseas Corp., 92-3017 (La.9/3/92), .
- McKnight v. McCastle 928 So. 2d 45 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
-
Hamilton v. Wild
917 So. 2d 695
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
In response, in which the supreme court stated that the adequacy or inadequacy of an award should be determined by the facts or circumstances particular to a case at issue.
- Sciambra v. Jerome Imports, Inc. 921 So. 2d 145 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2005
- Munster v. Smith 917 So. 2d 1180 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
-
Gentry v. Biddle
916 So. 2d 347
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
The Louisiana Supreme Court set forth the standard for appellate review of a cert.
- Joseph Moraus v. Jennifer Frederick La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
-
Claudia Reynolds Gentry v. Johnny Biddle, Jr., M.D., Lpcf
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
The Louisiana Supreme Court set forth the standard for appellate review of a trial court’s cert.
-
Chastity Ardoin v. Mitchell Bourgeois
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
9 the supreme court instructed that an appellate court should rarely disturb a general damage award: [T]he discretion vested in the trier of fact is “great,” and even vast, so that an appellate court should rarely disturb an award of general damages.
- Tessica Spears v. City of Scott La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
- Moraus v. Frederick 916 So. 2d 474 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
-
Ardoin v. Bourgeois
916 So. 2d 329
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
the supreme court instructed that an appellate court should rarely disturb a general damage award: [T]he discretion vested in the trier of fact is "great," and even vast, so that an appellate court should rarely disturb an award of general damages.
- Spears v. City of Scott 915 So. 2d 983 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
- Creel v. Southern Natural Gas Co. 917 So. 2d 491 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
-
Stephen P. Basco, Et Ux. v. Liberty Mutual Ins. Co.
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
Importantly, on review, an appellate court should rarely disturb an award of general damages because “the discretion vested in the trier of fact is ‘great,’ and even vast.” cert.
- Basco v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. 909 So. 2d 660 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
- Smith v. Tidewater Inc. 918 So. 2d 1 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2005
- Richard v. Colomb 916 So. 2d 1122 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
- Randy Stanford v. Town of Ball La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
- Stanford v. Town of Ball 903 So. 2d 1235 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
- Burgard v. Allstate Ins. Co. 904 So. 2d 867 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
- Grefer v. Alpha Technical 901 So. 2d 1117 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2005