Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Youn v. Maritime Overseas Corp., 623 So. 2d 1257.

1628 citing documents.

Domangue v. Mr. Gatti's, Inc. 657 So. 2d 689 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
In Re Medical Review Panel 657 So. 2d 713 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
Clark v. BATON ROUGE GENERAL MED. CENTER 657 So. 2d 741 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
Richard v. St. Paul Fire and Marine Ins. Co. 657 So. 2d 1087 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
Sutton v. Lambert 657 So. 2d 697 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
Doucet v. Champagne 657 So. 2d 92 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
and Stobart v. State, Department of Transportation and Development
Schexneider v. Louisiana Dept. of Health and Hospitals 660 So. 2d 508 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
Dauzat v. Rapides Parish Police Jury 657 So. 2d 484 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
Use v. Use 654 So. 2d 1355 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
Segura v. State Farm Ins. Co. 657 So. 2d 1047 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
Tartar v. Hymes 656 So. 2d 756 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1995
10, a case which involved the review of damages, that "the discretion vested in the trier of fact is `great,' and even vast," -83 (La.1993), which involved the standard of review of findings of fact, a "court of appeal may not set aside a trial court's or a jury's find
Ruttley v. Steiner 656 So. 2d 1095 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
10, a case which involved the review of damages, that “the discretion vested in the trier of fact is ‘great,’ and even vast,” -83 (La.1993), which involved the standard of review of findings of fact, a “court of appeal may not set aside a trial court’s or a jury’s find
Delphen v. Dept. of Transp. & Dev. 657 So. 2d 328 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
Black v. STATE, DEPT. OF PUBLIC SAFETY & CORR. 657 So. 2d 270 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
Young v. Logue 660 So. 2d 32 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
Seagers v. Pailet 656 So. 2d 700 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1995
Rowsey v. Jones 655 So. 2d 560 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
Daigle v. US Fidelity and Guar. Ins. Co. 655 So. 2d 431 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
Ricker v. Hebert 655 So. 2d 493 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
cert den., ___ U.S. ___, 114 S.Ct.
Brankline v. Capuano 656 So. 2d 1 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
Royal Const. Co., 496 So.2d at 1305 ; (La.App.
Arceneaux v. Wallis 654 So. 2d 1117 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
Haydel v. Hercules Transport, Inc. 654 So. 2d 418 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
Coleman v. Robicheaux Air Boats, Inc. 657 So. 2d 1331 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
5th Cir. 1992), set aside in part on other grounds (on damages), cert.
Palmer v. K-Mart Corp. 653 So. 2d 1334 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
Usé v. Usé 654 So. 2d 1355 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
Gage v. Potts 653 So. 2d 1183 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
Emoakemeh v. Southern University 654 So. 2d 474 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
Ehrman v. Holiday Inns, Inc. 653 So. 2d 732 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
certiorari denied, Maritime Overseas Corp. v. Youn, ___ U.S. ___, 114, S.Ct.
Simon v. Fasig-Tipton Co. 652 So. 2d 1351 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
In re Morales 652 So. 2d 1095 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., Spillers v. Montgomery Ward & Co., Inc., cert.
Broussard v. Fidelity Fire & Casualty Insurance Co. 651 So. 2d 959 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
Istre v. Bratton 653 So. 2d 1205 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
Shaw v. Russell 652 So. 2d 133 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
Reid v. State Through DOTD, 25,778, 25,780 (La.App.
Jeffery v. Thibaut Oil Co. 652 So. 2d 1021 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1995
Blackwell v. St. Romain Oil Co. 651 So. 2d 441 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
10, a case which involved the review of damages, that “the discretion vested in the trier of fact is ‘great,’ and even vast,” -883 (La.1993), which involved the standard of review of findings of fact, a “court of appeal may not set aside a trial court’s or a jury’s fin
Phillips v. Winn Dixie Stores, Inc. 650 So. 2d 1259 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
Gamino v. Lakeside Hosp. 652 So. 2d 36 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1995
10, a case which involved the review of damages, that "the discretion vested in *43 the trier of fact is `great,' and even vast," -83 (La.1993), which involved the standard of review of findings of fact, a "court of appeal may not set aside a trial court's or a jury's
Hoyt v. Wood/Chuck Chipper Corp. 651 So. 2d 1344 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
As we know under *1358 this discretion is vast, and the jury's fact findings are almost unchangeable at an appellate level.
Mistretta v. Shoney's, Inc. 650 So. 2d 301 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1995
Tabora v. City of Kenner 650 So. 2d 319 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1995
In Stobart v. State, through DOTD, the court restated the principle that a factfinder's choice between two permissible views of the evidence "cannot be manifestly erroneous or clearly wrong;" the courts of appeal were instructed to give great, "even vast" deference to the findings of fact made by the trial court.
Leblanc v. Hughes 649 So. 2d 1063 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
To the extent that the jury failed to award any property damages whatsoever when some were clearly attributable to the accident, it clearly erred
Followed Gaines v. Ryan's Family Steakhouse, Inc. 654 So. 2d 704 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
Bradford v. Winn Dixie of Louisiana, Inc. 648 So. 2d 464 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
Andrus v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 650 So. 2d 275 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
It is only when the award is, in either direction, beyond that which a reasonable trier of fact could assess for the effects of the particular injury to the particular plaintiff under the particular circumstances that the appellate court should increase or reduce the award.” -61 (La.1993), cert.
Guillen v. TRANSIT MANAGE. OF SE LA 648 So. 2d 487 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
Angeron v. Martin 649 So. 2d 40 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
Youn v. Maritime Overseas Corp. cert.
Guidroz v. STATE, THROUGH DOTD 648 So. 2d 1361 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
Wood v. May 647 So. 2d 1265 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
Bridgett v. Odeco, Inc. 646 So. 2d 1249 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
Aime v. Seaboard System Railroad 648 So. 2d 20 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994