Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Youn v. Maritime Overseas Corp., 623 So. 2d 1257.

1628 citing documents.

Brown v. Beauregard Elec. Co-Op., Inc. 647 So. 2d 668 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
Romaguera v. Piccadilly Cafeterias, Inc. 648 So. 2d 1000 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1994
10, a case which involved the review of damages, that "the discretion vested in the trier of fact is `great,' and even vast," -83 (La.1993), which involved the standard of review of findings of fact, a "court of appeal may not set aside a trial court's or a jury's find
Detraz v. Hartford Acc. & Indem. Co. 647 So. 2d 576 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
Blackshear v. Allstate Ins. Co. 647 So. 2d 589 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
Davis v. STATE, DOTD 647 So. 2d 552 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
Lachney v. Automotive Casualty Insurance Co. 647 So. 2d 645 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
Naquin v. Teer 649 So. 2d 993 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
and Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
Jarreau v. Hirschey 650 So. 2d 1189 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
Cornish v. STATE, DEPT. OF TRANSP. AND DEVELOP. & DEV. 647 So. 2d 1170 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
Girvan v. New Orleans Pub. Serv. Inc. 646 So. 2d 481 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
As an intermediate appellate court, certiorari denied, ___ U.S. ___, 114 S.Ct.
Gygax v. Brugoto 646 So. 2d 1236 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
cert denied, ___ U.S. ___, 114 S.Ct.
Maynor v. Vosburg 648 So. 2d 411 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
Sebastien v. McKay 649 So. 2d 711 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
See also, Youn v. *716 Maritime Overseas Corp.
Bush v. Arrow International 646 So. 2d 1173 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
Alleman v. Brownie Drilling Co. 647 So. 2d 371 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
See generally, Aisole, supra ; Stobart, supra, at 882-83 ; -61 (La.1993); and Reck v. Stevens, supra .
Koepp v. Sea-Land Service, Inc. 645 So. 2d 1269 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
Spears v. Jefferson Parish School Bd. 646 So. 2d 1104 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1994
Thibodeaux v. USAA Cas. Ins. Co. 647 So. 2d 351 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
Broussard v. Meaux 649 So. 2d 661 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
Citing Reck with approval, -1261 (La.1993), recently provided additional guidance as to the proper review of damages: " (La.
Fitch v. Vintage Petroleum, Inc. 652 So. 2d 998 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
Faul v. STATE, DOTD 649 So. 2d 493 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
Strawder v. Zapata Haynie Corp. 649 So. 2d 554 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
Collins v. Bentley 645 So. 2d 283 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
Barr v. Smith, 25,432 (La.
Watterson v. Mallard Bay Drilling, Inc. 649 So. 2d 431 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
2324.1 our Supreme Court characterized this discretion as "`great' and even vast."
Hopper v. Crown 646 So. 2d 933 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
White v. STATE, DEPT. OF PUBLIC SAFETY & CORRECTIONS 644 So. 2d 684 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
our supreme court further articulated the standard for judicial review of general damages awards: "[T]he discretion vested in the trier of fact is `great,' and even vast, so that an appellate court should rarely disturb an award of general damages.
Rivere v. Union Pacific R. Co. 647 So. 2d 1140 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
James v. Webb 643 So. 2d 424 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
Tatum v. Old Republic Ins. Co. 643 So. 2d 419 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
Futch v. Futch 643 So. 2d 364 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
Barr v. Smith, 25,432 (La.
Evans v. Haynie 643 So. 2d 273 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
Choyce v. SISTERS 642 So. 2d 287 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
Caldwell v. Smith 641 So. 2d 1011 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
Buffinet v. Plaquemines Parish Com'n 645 So. 2d 631 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
McCann v. ABC Ins. Co. 640 So. 2d 865 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
The standard of appellate review of general damages awards was aptly given in Youn *876 v. Maritime Overseas Corp., when the court stated: The standard for appellate review of general damage awards is difficult to express and is necessarily non-specific, and the requirement of an articulated basis for disturbing such awards gives little guidance as to what articulation suffices to justify modification of a generous
Alonzo v. Silverman & Marks Plumbing Co. 640 So. 2d 876 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
wherein the Court stated: The standard for appellate review of general damage awards is difficult to express and is necessarily non-specific, and the requirement of an articulated basis for disturbing such awards gives little guidance as to what articulation suffices to justify modification of a generous or
Nigreville v. Federated Rural Elec. Ins. Co. 642 So. 2d 216 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
Ambrose v. New Orleans Police Amb. Serv. 639 So. 2d 216 La. 1994
Const. art. 5, § 10, a case which involved the review of damages, that "the discretion vested in the trier of fact is `great,' and even vast," -83 (La.1993), which involved the standard of review of findings of fact, a "court of appeal may not set aside a trial court's or a jury's find
Gilchrist v. Ozone Spring Water Co. 639 So. 2d 489 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
Nevertheless, the theme that emerges from earlier jurisprudence, -1261 (La.1993), certiorari denied ___ U.S. ___, 114 S.Ct.
Moore v. Gencorp, Inc. 641 So. 2d 592 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
DeRouen v. Audirsch 639 So. 2d 476 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
Orillion v. Carter 639 So. 2d 461 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
Montet v. Lyles 638 So. 2d 727 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
Sledge v. Continental Cas. Co. 639 So. 2d 805 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
Chambers v. Graybiel 639 So. 2d 361 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
Mayo v. Nissan Motor Corp. 639 So. 2d 773 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
Rabalais v. Wal-Mart of Alexandria 640 So. 2d 785 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
Dupre v. Exxon Pipeline Co. 638 So. 2d 1118 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
The Supreme Court, -1261 (La.1993) reiterated the standard of review for general damage award as follows: (La.
Urcia v. Department of Transportation & Development ex rel. State 638 So. 2d 416 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
Followed Makin v. Continental Insurance Co. 638 So. 2d 460 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
As to the award of general damages