Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Youn v. Maritime Overseas Corp., 623 So. 2d 1257.

1628 citing documents.

Eileen Laday v. John Doe, Lafayette City-Parish Consolidated Government La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
LADAY v. Doe 59 So. 3d 516 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
Curry v. Healthsouth North Rehabilitation Hospital-Homer Campus 58 So. 3d 1143 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
Terrance D. Andrus v. Accc Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
-61 (La.1993) (footnote omitted).
James D. Mitcham v. Dr. Ernesto Kufoy La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
Mitcham v. Kufoy 57 So. 3d 570 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
Geraldine Henry, Et Vir. v. Brett A. Jones La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
OPINION In considering whether the award of general damages is excessive or insufficient, cert.
Norma Jean Hardy and Jonathan David Hardy v. Gene M. Augustine La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
(citations omitted), cert.
August F. Tjon v. Dr. Steve Fitzgerald La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
Hardy v. Augustine 55 So. 3d 1019 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
(citations omitted), ce rt.
In Re Medical Review Panel Claim of Dunjee 57 So. 3d 541 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
The Louisiana Supreme Court described the extent of a trial court’s discretion in assessing general damages: “[T]he discretion vested in the trier of fact is ‘great,’ and even vast, so that an appellate court should rarely disturb an award of general damages.”
Mixter v. Wilson 54 So. 3d 1164 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2010
Muller v. Colony Insurance Co. 57 So. 3d 341 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Henry Adam Baltazar, Etc. v. Dennis R. Wolinski La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
General Damages In considering whether an award of general damages is excessive or inadequate, cert.
Miriam H. Dyess v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
As to the awards of general damages, the standard of review is whether the trial judge abused his much discretion in fixing the award
Chrystal Corbello v. Kevin Berken La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
Baltazar v. Wolinski 53 So. 3d 591 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
General Damages In considering whether an award of general damages is excessive or inadequate, cert.
Joseph v. Archdiocese of New Orleans 52 So. 3d 203 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
stated: “[T]he discretion vested in the trier of fact is ‘great,’ and even vast, so that an appellate court should rarely disturb an award of general damages.” 3 See also Bouquet v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 08-0309, p. 5 (La.4/4/08), ; Moffitt v. Sewerage & Water Board of New Orle
Carolann Downing v. John Miller La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
Julie Gayle Guillory v. Roland Dennis Guillory La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
Guillory v. Guillory 50 So. 3d 281 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Smegal v. Gettys 48 So. 3d 431 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Craig Steven Arabie v. Citgo Petroleum Corporation La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
Arabie v. Citgo Petroleum Corp. 49 So. 3d 985 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Howard v. Union Carbide Corp. 50 So. 3d 1251 La. 2010
Nicol E. Hannie v. Ray Allen Guidry La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
Patricia P. Antley and Ricky Antley v. the State of La., Thru the Board of Sup. for the … La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
In considering whether the award of general damages is excessive, (La.1993), cert.
Patricia Case and Patrick Case v. Shelter Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
Hannie v. Guidry 48 So. 3d 396 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Case v. Shelter Insurance Co. 48 So. 3d 1196 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Guillot v. Daimlerchrysler Corp. 50 So. 3d 173 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Williams v. Stewart 46 So. 3d 266 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Douglas v. Children's Hospital 69 So. 3d 434 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Schysm v. Boyd 47 So. 3d 977 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
Pittard v. Lewis 46 So. 3d 202 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
Alisa Simon v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
Simon v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 43 So. 3d 990 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Because we find legal error in the trial court’s award of damages, we are not bound by the highest/lowest constraints articulated in Coco v. Winston Indus., Inc., cert.
See v. Entergy Corp. 35 So. 3d 1081 La. 2010
Kathleen C. Pfefferle v. Haynes Best Western of Alexandria La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
Tasha Tingle, Etc. v. American Home Assurance Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
The law regarding appellate review 9 of damage awards provides that the discretion vested in the trier of fact is “great.” cert.
Barbara Raymond v. Government Employees Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
Youn v. Maritime Overseas Corp., et al., reh’g denied, 10/7/93.
Raymond v. Government Employees Insurance 40 So. 3d 1179 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Youn v. Maritime Overseas Corp., et al., reh’g denied, 10/7/93.
Tingle v. American Home Assurance Co. 40 So. 3d 1169 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
The law regarding appellate review |10of damage awards provides that the discretion vested in the trier of fact is “great.” cert.
Pfefferle v. Haynes Best Western of Alexandria 38 So. 3d 1189 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
James Lee Bancroft, Et Ux. v. Mitchell Offshore Marine, LLC La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
Bancroft v. Mitchell Offshore Marine, LLC 44 So. 3d 711 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Moffitt v. Sewerage & Water Board of New Orleans 40 So. 3d 336 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
As to general damages, -61 (La.1993), instructs us that: | iJTjhe role of an appellate court in reviewing general damages is not to decide what it considers to be an appropriate award, but rather to review the exercise of discretion by the trier of fact.
Thongsavanh v. Schexnayder 40 So. 3d 989 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Ratliff v. LSU Board of Supervisors 38 So. 3d 1068 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Code art. 2324.1; -61 (La.1993), ce rt.
Rodriquez v. Jefferson Parish Sheriff's Office 40 So. 3d 197 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
the court set out the proper standard of review of general damage awards in detail.