Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Youn v. Maritime Overseas Corp., 623 So. 2d 1257.
- Smith v. Louisiana Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance Co. 35 So. 3d 463 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
- Moody v. Cummings 37 So. 3d 1054 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
-
Laura Cox Brown v. Shelter Insurance Company
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
In considering whether the award of general damages is excessive, (La.1993), cert.
-
Cox v. Shelter Insurance Co.
34 So. 3d 398
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
In considering whether the award of general damages is excessive, , (La.1993), cert.
- Iles v. Ogden 37 So. 3d 427 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
- Louisiana Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance Company v. Perricone 34 So. 3d 1166 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
- Alexander Marshall v. Nathan Boydston La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
-
Scott Ferguson v. Loewer Powersports & Equipment
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
Youn v. Maritime Overseas Corp., et al., reh'g denied, 10/7/93.
- Marshall v. Boydston 33 So. 3d 438 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
-
Ferguson v. LOEWER POWERSPORTS & EQUIPMENT
33 So. 3d 446
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Youn v. Maritime Overseas Corp., et al., reh’g denied, 10/7/93.
- Thibodaux v. ST. MARY PARISH SEWER DISTRICT 07 30 So. 3d 284 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
- Blood v. STERLING SUGARS, INC. 30 So. 3d 284 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
-
Savage v. State Farm Mutual Insurance
33 So. 3d 919
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Youn v. Maritime Overseas Corp., et al., reh’g denied, 10/7/93.
- Donald R. Alexander v. Ira M. Tate La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
- Karen Gail King v. Leslie Allen Moton La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
- King v. Moton 30 So. 3d 287 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
- Alexander v. Tate 30 So. 3d 1122 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
- Graham v. Offshore Specialty Fabricators, Inc. 37 So. 3d 1002 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
-
Margie F. Martin v. Safeway Insurance co.of Louisiana
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
Co., (the fact finder's discretion in awarding general damages is vast and should rarely be disturbed); Reck v. Stevens[,] 501 (La.1979).
- James Jason, III v. Louisiana Municipal Risk Management Agency La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
- Jason v. Louisiana Municipal Risk Management Agency 27 So. 3d 329 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
-
Charles Lee Johnson, Et Ux. v. Brookshire Grocery Company D/B/A Super One Foods
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
The standard of review to determine whether a cert.
-
James Lastrapes, Et Ux. v. Progressive Insurance Co.
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
Importantly, on review, an appellate court should rarely disturb an award of general damages because “the discretion vested in the trier of fact is ‘great,’ and even vast.” cert.
- Anita Johnson v. State Farm Insurance Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
-
Bethel Roberts v. American Century Casualty Co.
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
As they are speculative, a trial court’s cert.
- Johnson v. State Farm Insurance Co. 27 So. 3d 307 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
-
Lastrapes v. Progressive Security Insurance Co.
24 So. 3d 993
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Importantly, on review, an appellate court should rarely disturb an award of general damages because “the discretion vested in the trier of fact is ‘great,’ and even vast.” cert.
-
Johnson v. BROOKSHIRE GROCERY COMPANY
25 So. 3d 255
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
The standard of review to determine whether a cert.
-
Roberts v. AMERICAN CENTURY CASUALTY COMPANY
25 So. 3d 255
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
As they are speculative, a cert.
-
GOHRES v. Dryer
29 So. 3d 640
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
cert, denied, 510 U.S. 1114 , 114 S.Ct.
- Lynette M. Martin v. Ermc, II La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
-
Felicia Desselle v. Allstate Insurance Company
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
As they are speculative, a trial court’s cert.
- Martin v. ERMC, II 23 So. 3d 1008 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
- Yee v. Imperial Fire & Casualty Ins. Co. 25 So. 3d 872 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
-
Howard v. Union Carbide Corp.
21 So. 3d 1084
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
510 U.S. 1114 , 114 S.Ct.
- Holmes v. Hicks 24 So. 3d 1031 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
-
DUNOMES v. Plaquemines Parish Government
24 So. 3d 242
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
-61 (La.1993): The initial inquiry is whether the award for the particular injuries and their ef *245 fects under the particular circumstances on the particular injured person is a clear abuse of the “much discretion” of the trier of fact....
-
Carol Ann St. Julian v. Harold Wiltz
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
As they are speculative, a trial court’s cert.
-
St. Julian v. Wiltz
21 So. 3d 449
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
As they are speculative, a trial court’s (La.
-
Flemings v. State
19 So. 3d 1220
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
This remaining amount would hardly constitute an abuse of discretion when we consider “the particular injuries and their effects under the particular circumstances on the particular injured person.”
-
Dubuy v. Luse
17 So. 3d 425
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
"[T]he standard for appellate review of general damage awards is difficult to express and is necessarily non-specific, and the requirement of an articulated basis for disturbing such awards gives little guidance as to what articulation suffices to justify modification of a generous or stingy award.” U.S. cert.
- Logan v. Brink's Inc. 16 So. 3d 530 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
-
Guillory v. Lee
16 So. 3d 1104
La. 2009
Youn v. Maritime Overseas Corp., et al., reh’g denied, 10/7/93.
- Vick v. Pankey 15 So. 3d 1199 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
-
Watters v. Department of Social Services
15 So. 3d 1128
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
The jurisprudential theme that has emerged is that “the discretion vested in the trier of fact is ‘great,’ and even vast, so that an appellate court should rarely disturb an award of general damages.”
- Todd v. Delta Queen Steamboat Co. 15 So. 3d 107 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2009
- Ferrer v. Harwood 11 So. 3d 1242 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
- Tonia Sellers, Etc. v. Rapides Parish School Board La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
- Kenneth Wayne Jackson v. Brookshire Grocery Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
- Jackson v. Brookshire Grocery Co. 11 So. 3d 741 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009