Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Mundy v. Dept. of Health & Human Res., 620 So. 2d 811.

170 citing documents.

Martinez v. Wilson 24 So. 3d 1032 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
8/29/01), ; Mundy v. Dep't of Health & Human Resources, (La.
Patrick E. Phillips, Jr. v. G & H Seed Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
Syrie v. Schilhab, 96-1027, p. 4-5 (La.5/20/97); -77; Berry v. State, Through Dept. of Health and Human Resources, 93-2748, p. 4 (La.5/23/94)
Phillips v. G & H Seed Co., Inc. 10 So. 3d 339 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Syrie v. Schilhab, 96-1027, p. 4-5 (La.5/20/97); -77 ; Berry v. State, Through Dept. of Health and Human Resources, 93-2748, p. 4 (La.5/23/94)
J.M., D.M., INDV. AND ON BEHALF OF HIS MINOR CHILD, K.M. AND M.R., INDV. AND ON BEHALF OF … La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
Mundy v. Dept. of Health & Human Resources
J.M. v. Avoyelles Parish School Board 7 So. 3d 105 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Mundy v. Dept. of Health & Human Resources
Joyce Marie Perry v. Capital One, N.A. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
Peterson v. Gibraltar Savings and Loan, 98-1601, 98-1609, p. 7 (La.5/18/99)
Perry v. Capital One, N. A. 1 So. 3d 794 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
Peterson v. Gibraltar Savings and Loan, 98-1601, 98-1609, p. 7 (La.5/18/99), ; (La.
Gammill v. Invacare Corp. 2 So. 3d 557 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
Downs v. EOM ENTERTAINMENT, INC. 997 So. 2d 125 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
ND v. Ochsner Clinic, LLC 983 So. 2d 1034 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
Century Ready Mix Corp. v. Boyte 968 So. 2d 893 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
& Loan, 98-1601, 98-1609, (La.5/18/99), ; Mundy v. Dep't of Health & Human Resources, Faucheaux v. Terrebonne Consol.
Lowery v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 965 So. 2d 980 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
Monson v. TRAVELERS PROPERTY & CAS. INS. 955 So. 2d 758 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
Foley v. Entergy Louisiana, Inc. 946 So. 2d 144 La. 2006
Mundy v. Department of Health & Human Resources, (Whether the defendant has breached a duty is a question of fact to which the manifest error standard of review applies).
Jenkins v. Fanguy 946 So. 2d 201 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
Id., p. 7, 699 So.2d at 1078 (citing Mundy v. Department of Health & Human Resources, ).
Harris v. State ex rel. Department of Public Safety & Corrections 950 So. 2d 795 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
Thomas v. AP Green Industries, Inc. 933 So. 2d 843 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
Cook v. Kendrick 931 So. 2d 420 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
2d Cir.12/07/94), , writ denied, 95-0075 (La.03/17/95), , Harris v. Pizza Hut of Louisiana, Inc.
Wilde v. Harrell 930 So. 2d 1095 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
Lemann v. Essen Lane Daiquiris, Inc. 923 So. 2d 627 La. 2006
Peterson v. Gibraltar Savings and Loan, 98-1601, 98-1609, p. 7 (La.5/18/99)
Bujol v. Entergy Services, Inc. 922 So. 2d 1113 La. 2006
While this Court has twice cited 324A to hold that, where a duty to protect others against criminal misconduct has been assumed, liability may be created by a negligent breach of that duty, and Harris v. Pizza Hut of Louisiana, Inc., we have never discussed whether such a cause of action is available in the parent-subsidiary context under Louisiana law, or analyzed the elements required to set forth a cause of action against a parent corporation under 324A.
Mosley v. TEMPLE BAPTIST CHURCH OF RUSTON 920 So. 2d 355 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
Mundy v. Department of Health and Human Resources, 92-3251 (La.1993), .
Long v. STATE EX REL. DOTD 916 So. 2d 87 La. 2005
& Loan, 98-1601 (La.5/18/99), ; Mundy v. State, Dept. of Health and Human Resources, 92-3251 (La.6/17/93), .
Brown v. Ascension Parish 887 So. 2d 39 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
Mundy v. Department of Health & Human Resources
Durmon v. Billings 873 So. 2d 872 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
Vermilion Parish Police Jury v. Tim Albert La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
Robert Troy Richard v. Karl M. Miller La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
Vermilion Parish Police Jury v. Albert 867 So. 2d 67 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
Richard v. Miller 867 So. 2d 983 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
Berry v. State, Through Dept. of Health and Human Resources, 93-2748, p. 4 (La.5/23/94)
Spencer v. Red River Lodging 865 So. 2d 337 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
Faulkner v. McCarty Corp. 853 So. 2d 24 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
Woodbury v. DEPT. OF TRANSP. AND DEVELOPMENT 848 So. 2d 104 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
Adams v. Traina 830 So. 2d 526 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
Pinsonneault v. Merchants & Farmers Bank & Trust Co., 01-2217 (La.04/03/02), ; Hardy v. Bowie, 98-2821 (La.09/08/99)
Ethyl Corp. v. Gulf States Utilities, Inc. 836 So. 2d 172 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
Breach of duty is a question of fact, Mundy v. Dep't of Health & Human Resources, subject to the manifest error standard of review.
Pinsonneault v. Merchants & Farmers Bank & Trust Company 816 So. 2d 270 La. 2002
1991), on rehearing, 605 So.2d at 1050, 1051 (La.1991); on rehearing, 556 So.2d at 13 (La.1989); Thomas C. Galligan, Jr., A Primer on the Patterns of Negligence, 53 La.L.Rev.
Dorty v. City of Pineville 815 So. 2d 393 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
Berry v. State, Through Dept. of Health and Human Resources, 93-2748, p. 4 (La.5/23/94)
Vail v. Masker 812 So. 2d 807 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
Robinson v. Yousuf, citing Mundy v. Dep’t. of Health and Human Resources
In Re New Orleans Train Car Leakage Fire Litigation 795 So. 2d 364 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
& Loan, 98-1601, 98-1609, p. 7 (La.5/18/99), ; Mundy v. Dep't of Health & Human Resources, Faucheaux v. Terrebonne Consol.
Myers v. Dronet 801 So. 2d 1097 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
[48] Mundy v. Department of Health & Human Resources
Menard v. City of Lafayette 786 So. 2d 354 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
Syrie v. Schilhab, 96-1027, p. 4-5 (La.5/20/97); -77 ; Berry v. State, Through Dept. of Health and Human Resources, 93-2748, p. 4 (La.5/23/94)
Marmer v. Queen of New Orleans 787 So. 2d 1115 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
& Loan, 98-1601, 98-1601, p. 7 (La.5/18/99), ; Mundy v. Dep't of Health & Human Resources, Faucheaux v. Terrebonne Consol.
Dodson v. Smith & Core, Inc. 808 So. 2d 656 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
ther liability exists under the facts of a particular case, plaintiff must prove (1) the conduct in question was the cause-in-fact of the resulting harm, (2) defendant owed a duty of care to plaintiff, (3) the requisite duty was breached by the defendant, and (4) the risk of harm was within the scope of protection afforded by the duty breached, Mundy v. Department of Health & Human Resources, Walker , 96-2345 at 6, 706 So.2d at 528 .
Black v. Avondale Industries, Inc. 783 So. 2d 505 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
Mundy v. Department of Health & Human Resources
DC v. St. Landry Parish School Bd. 802 So. 2d 19 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
Mundy v. Dept. of Health & Human Resources
Duncan v. Kansas City Southern Railway Co. 773 So. 2d 670 La. 2000
Syrie v. Schilhab, 96-1027, *676 p. 4-5 (La.5/20/97); -77 ; Berry v. State, Through Dept. of Health and Human Resources, 93-2748, p. 4 (La.5/23/94)
LeBlanc v. Stevenson 770 So. 2d 766 La. 2000
Campbell v. Louisiana Department of Transportation and Development, 94-1052 (La.1/17/95)
Pradia v. Southern Personnel of La., Inc. 776 So. 2d 474 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
Further, Southern Personnel was not the owner or operator of the facility where the accident occurred and, therefore, did not have a duty to exercise reasonable care for the safety of the persons on the premises or a duty to not expose such persons to unreasonable risks of injury or harm, as set forth in Mundy v. Department of Health & Human Resources
Harris v. Stimac 768 So. 2d 265 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
Faucheaux v. Terrebonne Consol.
Sullivan v. Wallace 766 So. 2d 654 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
Mundy v. Department of Health & Human Resources
Kendrick v. Louisiana and North West R. Co. 766 So. 2d 705 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
LeJeune, supra ; Syrie v. Schilhab, 96-1027 (La.5/20/97), ; Berry v. State, Through DHHR, 93-2748 (La.5/23/94), ; Mundy v. Department of Health & Human Resources