Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Dorthey, 623 So. 2d 1276.

2014 citing documents.

  • State v. Ellison 168 So. 3d 862 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
  • State v. Boyd 164 So. 3d 259 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    4 Cir. 10/15/14); (); Augustine, 555 So.2d at 1334 (noting that “a district court (upon resen-tencing) is not bound by the sentence previously imposed, whereas [a reviewing court] is bound by a legally imposed sentencing which is not unconstitutionally excessive”).
  • State v. J.M. 189 So. 3d 1079 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    In his fifth assignment of error, defendant argues that the sentences imposed were “unconstitutionally”
  • State of Louisiana v. Jonathan Hopkins La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
    “ ‘[T]he excessiveness of a sentence becomes a question of law reviewable under the appellate jurisdiction of this court.’ “ ().
  • State v. Bailey 152 So. 3d 1056 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
    State v. Fatheree, 46,686 (La.App.2d Cir.11/2/11), .
  • State v. Nicholson 152 So. 3d 207 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
  • State v. Mack 152 So. 3d 229 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
    State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03)
  • State v. Herrington 152 So. 3d 202 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
  • State v. Sanders 151 So. 3d 160 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
    State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03)
  • State v. Pernell 151 So. 3d 940 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    ‘The powers of government of the state are divided into three separate branches: legislative, executive, and judicial.’ ” (quoting La.
  • State v. Ross 182 So. 3d 983 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
  • State v. Wise 182 So. 3d 63 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    5 Cir. 2/23/04) , , writ denied, 04-0955 (La.10/1/04), ( State v. Ventress, 01-1165 (La.App.
  • State of Louisiana v. Dontrale Demarko Phillips La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
    “ ‘[T]he excessiveness of a sentence becomes a question of law reviewable under the appellate jurisdiction of this court.’ ” ().
  • State of Louisiana v. Simon J. Castille, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
    “ ‘[T]he excessiveness of a sentence becomes a question of law reviewable under the appellate jurisdiction of this court.’ ” ().
  • State in the Interest of S. D. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
    “ „[T]he excessiveness of a sentence becomes a question of law reviewable under the appellate jurisdiction of this court.‟” ().
  • State of Louisiana v. Michael L. Larry La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
    “ ‘[T]he excessiveness of a sentence becomes a question of law reviewable under the appellate jurisdiction of this court.’ ” ().
  • State of Louisiana v. Clerfy James Touchet La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
  • State v. Morning 149 So. 3d 925 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
    State v. Armstrong, 32,279 (La.App.2d Cir.9/22/99), , writ denied, 99-3151 (La.4/7/00)
  • State ex rel. S.D. 149 So. 3d 917 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    “ ‘[T]he exces-siveness of a sentence becomes a question of law reviewable under the appellate jurisdiction of this court.’ ” ().
  • State v. Moran 151 So. 3d 116 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
    State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03)
  • State v. Broussard 149 So. 3d 446 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
  • State v. Robinson 151 So. 3d 627 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
  • State v. Dominguez 148 So. 3d 648 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    On appeal, defendant argues that his sentence is constitutionally excessive and that the court should have considered a
  • State v. Baker 148 So. 3d 217 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
    State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03)
  • State v. Miller 147 So. 3d 1201 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
  • State v. Gibson 147 So. 3d 280 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
  • State v. Scoggins 147 So. 3d 276 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
  • State v. Oliver 147 So. 3d 303 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
  • State v. Sullivan 146 So. 3d 952 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
  • State v. Byrd 145 So. 3d 536 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
    Id.; State v. Hill, 42,025 (La.App.2d Cir.5/9/07), , writ denied, 07-1209 (La.12/14/07), , and State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), .
  • State v. Lewis 144 So. 3d 1174 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
  • State of Louisiana v. Jimmy L. Bartie La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
    “ „[T]he excessiveness of a sentence becomes a question of law reviewable under the appellate jurisdiction of this court.‟ ” ().
  • State v. Parker 141 So. 3d 839 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
  • State v. Chisolm 139 So. 3d 1091 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
  • State v. Woods 139 So. 3d 1085 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
    State v. Smith, 01-2574 (La.1/14/03)
  • State of Louisiana v. Victor Sarvaunt La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
    “‘[T]he excessiveness of a sentence becomes a question of law reviewable under the appellate jurisdiction of this court.’” ().
  • State of Louisiana v. Toby James Fruge La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
    “„[T]he excessiveness of a sentence becomes a question of law reviewable under the appellate jurisdiction of this court.‟” ().
  • State v. Brooks 139 So. 3d 571 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
  • State v. Fruge 139 So. 3d 602 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    “ ‘[T]he exces-siveness of a sentence becomes a question of law reviewable under the appellate jurisdiction of this court.’ ” ().
  • State of Louisiana v. Darrell Dontrell Fort La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
    “ „[T]he excessiveness of a sentence becomes a question of law reviewable under the appellate jurisdiction of this court.‟ ” ().
  • State v. Elkins 138 So. 3d 769 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
  • State v. Price 136 So. 3d 991 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
  • State v. Dean 140 So. 3d 192 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    -81 (La.1993), the Louisiana Supreme Court specifically held that when a trial court determines the minimum sentence mandated by LSA-R.S.
  • State v. Gregoire 143 So. 3d 503 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
  • State of Louisiana v. Jeffrey Billy Sepulvado La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
    “„[T]he excessiveness of a sentence becomes a question of law reviewable under the appellate jurisdiction of this court.‟” ().
  • State v. Sepulvado 134 So. 3d 110 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    “ ‘[T]he exces-siveness of a sentence becomes a question of law reviewable under the appellate jurisdiction of this court.’ ” ().
  • State v. Blueford 137 So. 3d 54 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    State v. Dorthey, 92-3120 (La.9/10/93)
  • State of Louisiana v. Albert Meaux, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
    “ ‘[T]he excessiveness of a sentence becomes a question of law reviewable under the appellate jurisdiction of this court.’ ” ().
  • State v. White 136 So. 3d 280 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
  • State v. Mandigo 136 So. 3d 292 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014