DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Dorthey, 623 So. 2d 1276.

2014 citing documents.

  • State v. Frazier 134 So. 3d 1255 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
    pointing out that the benefit Frazier received from his plea bargain coupled with the great discretion of the sentencing court renders meritless any claim of constitutional exces-siveness.
  • State v. Kohlman 136 So. 3d 909 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
  • State v. Gay 136 So. 3d 919 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
  • State v. Henderson 136 So. 3d 299 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
    State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03)
  • State v. Vallo 134 So. 3d 1201 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
  • State of Louisiana v. Jamaal Cole Diggs La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
    LIFE IMPRISONMENT Defendant contends that he should not be automatically imprisoned for life without the chance or opportunity to ever be released without a which dealt with the mandatory sentencing required by our habitual offender laws.
  • State of Louisiana v. Eddie Ray Jackson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
    ― ‗[T]he excessiveness of a sentence becomes a question of law reviewable under the appellate jurisdiction of this court.‘ ‖ ().
  • State of Louisiana v. Travis W. Nolen La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
    “ „[T]he excessiveness of a sentence becomes a question of law reviewable under the appellate jurisdiction of this court.‟ ” ().
  • State v. Thomas 136 So. 3d 153 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    5 -81 (La.1993), the Louisiana Supreme Court set forth the standard for determining whether a sentence is unconstitutional: If ...
  • State v. Noble 133 So. 3d 703 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    The State filed another writ application in this court, arguing that | ? (1993).
  • State v. Jackson 132 So. 3d 516 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
    State v. Preston, supra; State v. Fatheree, 46,686 (La.App.2d Cir.11/2/11), .
  • State v. Osborne 130 So. 3d 1012 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
  • State v. Franklin 130 So. 3d 980 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
  • State v. Holmes 130 So. 3d 999 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
  • State v. Evans 130 So. 3d 965 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
  • State v. Sterling 131 So. 3d 295 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    Defendant filed a sentencing memorandum arguing for a
  • State of Louisiana v. Demorris Jones La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
    ― ‗[T]he excessiveness of a sentence becomes a question of law reviewable under the appellate jurisdiction of this court.‘ ‖ ().
  • State of Louisiana v. Derrick L. Harris La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
  • State v. Harris 156 So. 3d 694 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
  • State v. Fuller 130 So. 3d 960 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
  • State v. Walker 128 So. 3d 619 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
  • State v. Davis 128 So. 3d 1230 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
  • State v. Robinson 127 So. 3d 1000 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
  • State v. Moss 127 So. 3d 979 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
  • State v. Johnson 127 So. 3d 988 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
    State v. Smith, 01-2574 (La.1/14/03)
  • State v. Sellers 128 So. 3d 1235 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
  • State v. Dubose 128 So. 3d 613 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
  • State of Louisiana v. Christopher Vincent La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
    “ „[T]he excessiveness of a sentence becomes a question of law reviewable under the appellate jurisdiction of this court.‟ ” ().
  • State of Louisiana v. Jerry Anthony Brandon La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
    “ „[T]he excessiveness of a sentence becomes a question of law reviewable under the appellate jurisdiction of this court.‟ ” (quoting State v. 13 Sepulvado, ).
  • State of Louisiana v. Gus Jerrod Melbert La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
    ― ‗[T]he excessiveness of a sentence becomes a question of law reviewable under the appellate jurisdiction of this court.‘ ‖ ().
  • State of Louisiana v. Jammicka Greene La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
    “„[T]he excessiveness of a sentence becomes a question of law reviewable under the appellate jurisdiction of this court.‟” ().
  • State of Louisiana v. Gus Jerrod Melbert La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
    ― ‗[T]he excessiveness of a sentence becomes a question of law reviewable under the appellate jurisdiction of this court.‘ ‖ ().
  • State of Louisiana v. Jarvis Angelle La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
  • State v. Angelle 124 So. 3d 1247 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
  • State v. Greene 126 So. 3d 839 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    “ ‘[T]he excessiveness of a sentence becomes a question of law reviewable under the appellate jurisdiction of this court.’ ” ().
  • State v. Passow 136 So. 3d 12 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    See State v. Rome, 96-0991 (La.7/1/97), ; -81 (La.1993).
  • State of Louisiana v. Dana Bowles La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
    “ „[T]he excessiveness of a sentence becomes a question of law reviewable under the appellate jurisdiction of this court.‟ ” ().
  • State of Louisiana v. Corey Joseph Craig La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
    “ „[T]he excessiveness of a sentence becomes a question of law reviewable under the appellate jurisdiction of this court.‟ ” ().
  • State of Louisiana v. Dennis Weldon Thompson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
    “ „[T]he excessiveness of a sentence becomes a question of law reviewable under the appellate jurisdiction of this court.‟” ().
  • State v. Thompson 123 So. 3d 360 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    “ ‘[T]he exces-siveness of a sentence becomes a question of law reviewable under the appellate jurisdiction of this court.’ ” ().
  • State v. Bowles 123 So. 3d 350 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    “ ‘[T]he exces-siveness of a sentence becomes a question of law reviewable under the appellate jurisdiction of this court.’ ” ().
  • State v. Craig 123 So. 3d 1239 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    “ ‘[T]he exces-siveness of a sentence becomes a question of law reviewable under the appellate jurisdiction of this court.’ ” ().
  • State v. Lewis 125 So. 3d 482 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
  • State v. Robinson 125 So. 3d 1228 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
  • State v. Sims 123 So. 3d 806 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    the statute may still be unconstitutionally excessive if it “makes no measurable contribution to acceptable goals of punishment, or is nothing more than the purposeful imposition of pain and suffering and is grossly 19out of proportion to the severity of the crime.” Landfair , p. 17, 70 So.3d at 1072 (citing State v. Johnson, 97-1906, pp. 6-7 (La.3/4/98), , 677 -81 (La.1993)).
  • State v. Quinn 123 So. 3d 320 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    “ ‘A punishment is constitutionally excessive if it makes no measurable contribution to acceptable goals of punishment and is nothing more than the purposeless imposition of pain l^and suffering and is grossly out of proportion to the severity of the crime.’ ” (La.App.
  • State v. Hackett 122 So. 3d 1164 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    find that the facts of this case give rise to a sentence reduction pursuant to Dorthey [, (La.
  • State v. Dukes 121 So. 3d 1256 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
    determined that if the trial court finds, at the time the defendant is ultimately sentenced, that the punishment mandated by La.
  • State v. York 121 So. 3d 1226 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
    State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03)
  • State of Louisiana v. Bill Eric Winters La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
    See State v. Dorthey, [ (La.1993)] at 1281 (Marcus, J., concurring); State v. Young, [94-1636 (La.App.