DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Dorthey, 623 So. 2d 1276.

2014 citing documents.

  • State v. Kirkland 962 So. 2d 1173 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
    State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.01/14/03), ; (La.
  • State v. Desoto 968 So. 2d 146 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    "`[T]he excessiveness of a sentence becomes a question of law reviewable under the appellate jurisdiction of this court.'" ().
  • State v. Taylor 966 So. 2d 631 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
    The court then vacated defendant's original sentence and, imposed a habitual offender sentence of twelve years at hard labor without benefit of probation or suspension of sentence.
  • State v. Banks 961 So. 2d 645 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
    State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03)
  • State v. McKinney 961 So. 2d 589 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
  • State v. Simton 961 So. 2d 551 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
  • State v. Crow 960 So. 2d 1173 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
    State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03)
  • State v. McNeil 961 So. 2d 554 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
  • State v. Horton 962 So. 2d 459 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
    State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03)
  • State v. McDUFFEY 960 So. 2d 1175 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
    State v. Smith, 01-2574 (La.1/14/03)
  • State v. Sharpley 960 So. 2d 1230 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
    State v. Smith, 01-2574 (La.1/14/03)
  • State v. Williams 960 So. 2d 1199 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
    State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03)
  • State v. Cloward 960 So. 2d 356 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
  • State v. Coleman 961 So. 2d 579 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
  • State v. Beasley 960 So. 2d 1182 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
    State v. Dorthey, 92-3120 (La.9/10/93)
  • State v. Franklin 956 So. 2d 823 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
    State v. Smith, 01-2574 (La.1/14/03)
  • State of Louisiana v. Todd Vincent Edwards La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    “ ‘[T]he excessiveness of a sentence becomes a question of law reviewable under the appellate jurisdiction of this court.’ ” ().
  • State v. Edwards 963 So. 2d 419 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    "`[T]he excessiveness of a sentence becomes a question of law reviewable under the appellate jurisdiction of this court.'" State v. *431 Dorthey, ().
  • State v. Dorsey 960 So. 2d 1127 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
    Defendant does not argue on appeal — nor did he argue below — that the trial judge should have deviated *1131
  • State v. Case 957 So. 2d 917 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
    State v. Smith, 01-2574 (La.1/14/03), ; State v. Dorthey, *921
  • State v. Henderson 958 So. 2d 101 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
  • State v. Critton 957 So. 2d 875 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
  • State v. Trackling 958 So. 2d 1209 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
    State v. Johnson, 97-1906, pp. 6-7 (La.3/4/98), ; -81 (La.1993).
  • State v. Dauzart 960 So. 2d 1079 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
  • State v. Estes 956 So. 2d 779 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
  • State v. Mitchell 956 So. 2d 764 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
    State v. Dorthey, 92-3120 (La.9/10/93)
  • State v. Wilson 957 So. 2d 345 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
  • State v. Hill 956 So. 2d 758 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
  • State v. Wiltcher 956 So. 2d 769 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
  • State v. Monk 956 So. 2d 185 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
  • State v. Butler 968 So. 2d 175 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
  • State v. Yossett 956 So. 2d 109 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
    State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03)
  • State v. Chisley 957 So. 2d 226 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
  • State v. Moore 958 So. 2d 36 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
    He also filed a prior to sentencing.
  • State v. Cross 958 So. 2d 28 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
  • State v. Brown 956 So. 2d 53 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
    State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.01/14/03), ; (La.
  • State of Louisiana v. Reginald Provost La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    “ ‘[T]he excessiveness of a sentence becomes a question of law reviewable under the appellate jurisdiction of this court.’ ” ().
  • State of Louisiana v. Reginald Provost La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    “ ‘[T]he excessiveness of a sentence becomes a question of law reviewable under the appellate jurisdiction of this court.’ ” ().
  • State v. Dowden 954 So. 2d 300 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
    State v. Smith, 01-2574 (La.1/14/03), ; *310
  • State v. Houston 954 So. 2d 311 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
  • State of Louisiana v. Jake C. Desoto La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    “ ‘[T]he excessiveness of a sentence becomes a question of law reviewable under the appellate jurisdiction of this court.’ ” ().
  • State v. Taylor 956 So. 2d 25 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
  • State v. Sermons 953 So. 2d 958 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
  • State v. Williams 953 So. 2d 954 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
  • State v. Lathan 953 So. 2d 890 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
  • State v. Traylor 953 So. 2d 974 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
    State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03)
  • State v. Grady 954 So. 2d 183 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
  • State v. Douglas 952 So. 2d 793 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
  • State of Louisiana v. Betty Findlay La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
  • State v. Findlay 949 So. 2d 609 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    2861, 2866 , 53 L.Ed.2d 982 (1977); State v. Handy, 96-2505, p. 1 (La.1/6/97)