DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Dorthey, 623 So. 2d 1276.

2014 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana v. Ziguards Stanislauvs Kokoriss La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    “‘[T]he excessiveness of a sentence becomes a question of law reviewable under the appellate jurisdiction of this court.’” ().
  • State v. Washington 972 So. 2d 1203 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
    State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03)
  • State v. Stephens 973 So. 2d 145 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
    State v. Smith, 01-2574 (La.01/14/03)
  • State v. KOKORISS 970 So. 2d 1247 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    "`[T]he excessiveness of a sentence becomes a question of law reviewable under the appellate jurisdiction of this court.'" ().
  • State v. Beaner 974 So. 2d 667 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
  • State v. Lloyd 973 So. 2d 141 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
    State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03)
  • State v. Adams 973 So. 2d 777 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
    Defendant was sentenced to eight years at hard labor, and his sentence was suspended, without consideration, as requested by defense counsel, of a downward departure, from the statutorily provided sentence.
  • State v. Steward 969 So. 2d 804 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
    State v. Smith, 01-2574 (La.1/14/03)
  • State v. Young 969 So. 2d 789 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
  • State v. Brister 966 So. 2d 1249 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
  • State v. Adams 966 So. 2d 1247 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
  • State of Louisiana v. Robert Thomas Smith La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    means that because of unusual circumstances [he] is a victim of the legislature’s failure to assign sentences that are meaningfully tailored to the culpability of the offender, the gravity of the offense, and the circumstances.” State v. Johnson, 97-1906, p. 8 (La.3/4/98), (internal quotation marks and citation omitted); -81 (La.1993) (holding that a trial court must reduce a defendant’s sentence to one not constitutionally excessive if the trial court finds that the sentence mandated by the Hab
  • State of Louisiana v. Chad E. Batiste La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    2861, 2866, 53 L.Ed.2d 982 (1977); State v. Handy, 96-2505, p. 1 (La.1/6/97)
  • State of Louisiana v. Michael W. Colton La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    would permit a downward deviation from a statutorily-mandated sentence: In State v. Dorthey, supra, this Court held that a trial court must reduce a defendant’s sentence to one not constitutionally excessive if the trial court finds that the
  • State of Louisiana v. Gerald Ray Lewis La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    “‘[T]he excessiveness of a sentence becomes a question of law reviewable under the appellate jurisdiction of this court.’” ().
  • State v. Batiste 969 So. 2d 704 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    2861, 2866 , 53 L.Ed.2d 982 (1977); State v. Handy, 96-2505, p. 1 (La.1/6/97)
  • State v. Booker 968 So. 2d 1190 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
    State v. Smith, 01-2574 (La.1/14/03)
  • State v. Colton 968 So. 2d 1239 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    ., would permit a downward deviation from a statutorily-mandated sentence: In State v. Dorthey, supra, this Court held that a trial court must reduce a defendant's sentence to one not constitutionally excessive if the trial court finds that the sentence mandated by the Habitual Offender Law "makes no measurabl
  • State v. Smith 969 So. 2d 694 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    State v. Johnson, 97-1906, p. 8 (La.3/4/98), (internal quotation marks and citation omitted); -81 (La.1993) (holding that a trial court must reduce a defendant's sentence to one not constitutionally excessive if the trial court finds that the sentence mandated by the Habitual Offender Law "makes no measurable contribution to acceptable goals of punishment," or is nothing more than "the purposeful impositi
  • State v. Zeigler 968 So. 2d 875 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
  • State v. Barber 968 So. 2d 829 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
    State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.01/14/03)
  • State v. Wright 968 So. 2d 912 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
  • State v. Alsup 968 So. 2d 1152 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
    State v. Smith, 01-2574 (La.1/14/03)
  • State v. Freeman 968 So. 2d 342 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
    State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03)
  • State v. Taylor 968 So. 2d 1135 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
  • State v. King 969 So. 2d 1228 La. 2007
  • State of Louisiana v. Herbert Davenport, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    “‘[T]he excessiveness of a sentence becomes a question of law reviewable under the appellate jurisdiction of this court.’” 3 ().
  • State v. Davenport 967 So. 2d 563 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    "`[T]he excessiveness of a sentence becomes a question of law reviewable under the appellate jurisdiction of this court.'" ().
  • State v. Harris 966 So. 2d 773 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
    State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03)
  • State v. Ellis 966 So. 2d 139 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
    State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03)
  • State v. Brown 966 So. 2d 727 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
  • State v. Smith 967 So. 2d 548 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
    See State v. Smith, 01-2574 (La.01/14/03)
  • State v. Laurent 966 So. 2d 826 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
  • State v. Bowman 966 So. 2d 104 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
    State v. Dorthey, 92-3120 (La.9/10/93)
  • State v. Henry 966 So. 2d 692 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
  • State v. Grant 965 So. 2d 977 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
    State v. Smith, 01-2574 (La.1/14/03)
  • State v. Cotton 965 So. 2d 1016 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
  • State v. Dudley 984 So. 2d 11 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
    -81 (La.1993), the Louisiana Supreme Court recognized that if a trial judge determines that the punishment mandated by the Habitual-Offender Act makes no "measurable contribution to acceptable goals of punishment" or that the sentence amounts to nothing more than "the purposeful imposition of pain and suffering"
  • State v. Baker 966 So. 2d 124 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
  • State v. Bowers 965 So. 2d 959 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
    State v. Dorthey, 92-3120 (La.9/10/93), .
  • State v. Montgomery 966 So. 2d 127 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
    State v. Dorthey, 92-3120 (La.9/10/93), .
  • State v. Cozzetto 962 So. 2d 1225 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
    State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03)
  • State v. Burgess 965 So. 2d 621 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
  • State v. Harper 970 So. 2d 592 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
  • State v. Ross 965 So. 2d 610 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
    State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03)
  • State v. Prudhomme 963 So. 2d 546 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
  • State v. Kennedy 963 So. 2d 521 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
    State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03)
  • State v. Foster 962 So. 2d 1214 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
    State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03)
  • State v. Wyant 962 So. 2d 1165 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
    State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03)
  • State v. Whalen 963 So. 2d 531 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
    State v. Smith, 01-2574 (La.1/14/03)