DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Dorthey, 623 So. 2d 1276.

2014 citing documents.

  • State v. Kemp 896 So. 2d 349 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
  • State v. Sykes 900 So. 2d 156 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2005
    The court called a bench conference, and the court vacated that sentence and imposed a sentence of thirteen years at hard labor.
  • State v. Bajoie 899 So. 2d 78 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
  • State v. Sewell 894 So. 2d 1286 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
  • State v. Jackson 895 So. 2d 695 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
    In State v. Ponsell, 33,543 (La.App.2d Cir.08/23/00), , writ denied, 2000-2726 (La.10/12/01), , this court concluded that: 17[a]lthough, the Louisiana Supreme Court stated that courts have the power to declare a mandatory minimum sentence excessive under Article I, Section 20 of the Louisiana Constitution, this power should only be exercised in rare cases and only when the court is firmly convinced that the minimum sentence is excessive.
  • State v. Richardson 896 So. 2d 257 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
    As this court stated in State v. Ponsell, 33,543 (La.App.2d Cir.08/23/00), , writ denied, 2000-2726 (La.10/12/01), : Although, the Louisiana Supreme Court stated that courts have the power to declare a mandatory minimum sentence excessive under Article I, Section 20 of the Louisiana Constitution, this power should only be exercised in rare cases and only when the court is firmly convinced that the minimum sentence is excessive.
  • State v. Thompson 894 So. 2d 1268 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
  • State v. Hensley 900 So. 2d 1 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
  • State v. Donnaud 896 So. 2d 1151 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
    State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), ().
  • State v. Colar 893 So. 2d 152 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
    "`[T]he excessiveness of a sentence becomes a question of law reviewable under the appellate jurisdiction of this court.'" (quoting State v. *156 Sepulvado, ).
  • State of Louisiana v. Briant Keith Colar La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
    "‘[T]he excessiveness of a sentence becomes a question of law reviewable under the appellate jurisdiction of this court.’" ().
  • State of Louisiana v. Neal W. Insley La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
    “ ‘[T]he excessiveness of a sentence becomes a question of law reviewable under the appellate jurisdiction of this court.’ ” ().
  • State v. Insley 893 So. 2d 209 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
    "`[T]he excessiveness of a sentence becomes a question of law reviewable under the appellate jurisdiction of this court.'" ().
  • State v. Russell 920 So. 2d 866 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
    State v. Musgrove, supra
  • State v. Hardy 892 So. 2d 710 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
  • State v. Simpson 892 So. 2d 694 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
  • State v. Bonner 895 So. 2d 1 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
  • State v. Lowery 890 So. 2d 711 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
  • State v. Davis 890 So. 2d 708 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
  • State v. Grant 890 So. 2d 689 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
    that courts have the power to declare a mandatory minimum sentence excessive under Art. I, § 20 of the Louisiana Constitution, this power should only be exercised in rare cases and only when the court is firmly convinced that the minimum sentence is excessive.
  • State of Louisiana v. Ronald Spencer, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    2861, 2866, 53 L.Ed.2d 982 (1977); State v. Handy, 96-2505, p. 1 (La.1/6/97)
  • State v. Spencer 888 So. 2d 1128 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    2861, 2866 , 53 L.Ed.2d 982 (1977); State v. Handy, 96-2505, p. 1 (La.1/6/97)
  • State v. Brooks 889 So. 2d 1064 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
  • State v. Williams 889 So. 2d 1135 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
    State v. Johnson, 97-1906, pp. 6-7 (La.3/4/98), ().
  • State of Louisiana v. Jim Howard, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
  • State of Louisiana v. Orlon Peloquin La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    “‘[T]he excessiveness of a sentence becomes a question of law reviewable under the appellate jurisdiction of this court.’” ().
  • State v. Peloquin 888 So. 2d 393 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    "`[T]he excessiveness of a sentence becomes a question of law reviewable under the appellate jurisdiction of this court.'" ().
  • State v. Howard 888 So. 2d 375 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
  • State of Louisiana v. Lamar Pierce Phillips La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    2861, 2866, 53 L.Ed.2d 982 (1977); State v. Handy, 96-2505, p. 1 (La.1/6/97)
  • State v. Phillips 887 So. 2d 670 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    2861, 2866 , 53 L.Ed.2d 982 (1977); State v. Handy, 96-2505, p. 1 (La.1/6/97)
  • State v. Williams 888 So. 2d 971 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
  • State v. Douglas 888 So. 2d 982 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
  • State v. Bright 886 So. 2d 1183 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
  • State v. Hamilton 886 So. 2d 638 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
  • State v. Smith 886 So. 2d 1186 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
  • State v. Walker 886 So. 2d 641 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
    However, in State v. Ponsell, 33,543 (La.App.2d Cir.8/23/00), , writ denied, 2000-2726 (La.10/12/01), , this court concluded as follows: Although, the Louisiana Supreme Court stated that courts have the power to declare a mandatory minimum sentence excessive under Article I, Section 20 of the Louisiana Constitution, this power should only be exercised in rare cases and only when the court is firmly convinced that the minimum sentence is excessive.
  • State v. Meshell 886 So. 2d 1195 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
  • State v. Grant 887 So. 2d 596 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
  • State v. Carter 888 So. 2d 928 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
    State v. Johnson, 97-1906, pp. 6-7 (La.3/4/98), ().
  • State v. Disotell 882 So. 2d 1183 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
  • State v. Hogan 882 So. 2d 722 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
  • State v. Williams 882 So. 2d 682 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
    4 A sentence is considered grossly disproportionate if, when the crime and punishment are viewed in light of the harm done to society, it shocks the sense of justice.
  • State v. Edwards 882 So. 2d 1190 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
  • State v. Bannister 882 So. 2d 693 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
  • State v. Brewer 880 So. 2d 1005 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
    As this court stated in State v. Ponsell, 33,543 (La.App.2d Cir.8/23/00), , writ denied, 2000-2726 (La.10/12/01), : Although, the Louisiana Supreme Court stated that courts have the power to declare a mandatory minimum sentence excessive under Article I, Section 20 of the Louisiana Constitution, this power should only be exercised in rare cases and only when the court is firmly convinced that the minimum sentence is excessive.
  • State v. Stephan 880 So. 2d 201 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
  • State v. Green 880 So. 2d 179 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
    State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.03/04/98), ; State v. Gaddis, 36,661 (La.App.2d Cir.03/14/03), , writ denied, 2003-1275 (La.05/14/04), .
  • State v. White 880 So. 2d 192 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
  • State of Louisiana v. Renaldo Gerard Sweet La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    2861, 2866, 53 L.Ed.2d 982 (1977); State v. Handy, 96-2505, p. 1 (La.1/6/97)
  • State v. Sweet 880 So. 2d 43 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
    2861, 2866 , 53 L.Ed.2d 982 (1977); State v. Handy, 96-2505, p. 1 (La.1/6/97)