Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Dorthey, 623 So. 2d 1276.
- State v. Johnson 878 So. 2d 869 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
- State of Louisiana v. Delano Sutton La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
- State v. Curtis 877 So. 2d 1188 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
-
State v. Sutton
879 So. 2d 419
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
2861, 2866 , 53 L.Ed.2d 982 (1977); State v. Handy, 96-2505, p. 1 (La.1/6/97)
- State v. Moore 877 So. 2d 177 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
-
State v. Bailey
875 So. 2d 949
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
He further argued that his criminal history was non-violent and that, because of his drug problem, a lesser sentence than the mandatory minimum was warranted
- State v. June 873 So. 2d 939 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
- State v. Tillman 874 So. 2d 363 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
- State v. Dearbone 873 So. 2d 880 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
- State v. Bounds 873 So. 2d 901 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
- State of Louisiana v. Mark Edward Blake La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
- State v. Blake 872 So. 2d 602 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
-
State v. Townsend
874 So. 2d 152
La. 2004
(principles of res judicata and double jeopardy do not apply to habitual offender hearings); (same).
- State v. Haley 873 So. 2d 747 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
- State v. Parker 871 So. 2d 317 La. 2004
-
State v. Walton
872 So. 2d 1221
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
Furthermore, under Louisiana law, a sentence is unconstitutionally excessive if it “makes no measurable contribution to acceptable goals of punishment” and hence is “nothing more than the purposeful imposition of pain and suffering; and is grossly out of proportion to the severity of the crime.” State v. Handy, 96-2505, p. 1 (La.1/6/97)
- State v. Walker 870 So. 2d 442 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
- State v. Asad 870 So. 2d 455 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
-
State v. Taylor
880 So. 2d 831
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
[15] State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), ; State v. Cushinello, 01-109 (La.
-
State of Louisiana v. Darrell Brent Whatley
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
“ ‘[T]he excessiveness of a sentence becomes a question of law reviewable under the appellate jurisdiction of this court.’” ().
- State of Louisiana v. Fred Christopher Beverly La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
-
State v. Whatley
867 So. 2d 955
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
"`[T]he excessiveness of a sentence becomes a question of law reviewable under the appellate jurisdiction of this court.'" ().
- State v. Dykes 867 So. 2d 908 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
- State v. Beverly 867 So. 2d 107 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
-
State v. Douglas
868 So. 2d 896
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), ; State v. Cushinello, 01-109 (La.App.
-
State v. Pierre
869 So. 2d 206
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
However, the Louisiana Supreme Court recognized that a mandatory minimum sentence under the Habitual Offender Law may still be reviewed for constitutional excessiveness.
- State v. Volgamore 865 So. 2d 237 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
- State v. Cooper 864 So. 2d 892 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
- State v. Moore 865 So. 2d 227 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
- State v. Elzie 865 So. 2d 248 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
- State v. Hampton 865 So. 2d 284 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
-
State v. Smith
868 So. 2d 794
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
State v. Johnson, 97-1906, pp. 5-6 (La.3/4/98)
- State v. Guerra 865 So. 2d 154 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
-
State v. Converse
864 So. 2d 803
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
(case citations omitted) (La.
- State v. Swilley 862 So. 2d 1268 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
- State v. Triche 864 So. 2d 832 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
- State of Louisiana v. Christopher Ross La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
- State v. Ross 861 So. 2d 888 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
- State v. Lathen 862 So. 2d 1119 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
- State v. Jarrett 862 So. 2d 440 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
- State v. Fielding 862 So. 2d 420 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
-
State v. Hills
866 So. 2d 278
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
15:529.1; State v. Johnson, 709 So.2d at 676.
-
State v. Johnson
864 So. 2d 645
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
15:529.1; State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), ().
- State v. Young 862 So. 2d 312 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
-
State v. Wallace
862 So. 2d 286
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
State v. Johnson, 97-1906, p. 6-7 (La.3/4/98), ; -81 (La.1993).
-
State v. Terrell
858 So. 2d 1282
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
while finding that the Habitual Offender Law did not violate Louisiana’s constitutional separation of powers provision, the court stated: If ...
-
State v. Rogers
862 So. 2d 963
La. 2003
see also State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), .
-
State v. Emanuel-Dunn
868 So. 2d 75
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
-1281 (La.1993), the Louisiana Supreme Court recognized that if a trial judge determines that the punishment mandated by the Habitual Offender Law makes no "measurable contribution to acceptable goals of punishment" or that the sentence amounts to nothing more than "the purposeful imposition of pain and suffering
-
State v. Wilson
859 So. 2d 957
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
(case remanded to district court to determine whether minimum sentence mandated by Habitual Offender Law was unconstitutionally excessive).
- State of Louisiana v. David Wayne Wilturner La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003