Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Dorthey, 623 So. 2d 1276.

2014 citing documents.

  • State v. Johnson 878 So. 2d 869 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
  • State of Louisiana v. Delano Sutton La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
  • State v. Curtis 877 So. 2d 1188 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
  • State v. Sutton 879 So. 2d 419 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    2861, 2866 , 53 L.Ed.2d 982 (1977); State v. Handy, 96-2505, p. 1 (La.1/6/97)
  • State v. Moore 877 So. 2d 177 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
  • State v. Bailey 875 So. 2d 949 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
    He further argued that his criminal history was non-violent and that, because of his drug problem, a lesser sentence than the mandatory minimum was warranted
  • State v. June 873 So. 2d 939 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
  • State v. Tillman 874 So. 2d 363 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
  • State v. Dearbone 873 So. 2d 880 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
  • State v. Bounds 873 So. 2d 901 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
  • State of Louisiana v. Mark Edward Blake La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
  • State v. Blake 872 So. 2d 602 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
  • State v. Townsend 874 So. 2d 152 La. 2004
    (principles of res judicata and double jeopardy do not apply to habitual offender hearings); (same).
  • State v. Haley 873 So. 2d 747 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
  • State v. Parker 871 So. 2d 317 La. 2004
  • State v. Walton 872 So. 2d 1221 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
    Furthermore, under Louisiana law, a sentence is unconstitutionally excessive if it “makes no measurable contribution to acceptable goals of punishment” and hence is “nothing more than the purposeful imposition of pain and suffering; and is grossly out of proportion to the severity of the crime.” State v. Handy, 96-2505, p. 1 (La.1/6/97)
  • State v. Walker 870 So. 2d 442 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
  • State v. Asad 870 So. 2d 455 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
  • State v. Taylor 880 So. 2d 831 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
    [15] State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), ; State v. Cushinello, 01-109 (La.
  • State of Louisiana v. Darrell Brent Whatley La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    “ ‘[T]he excessiveness of a sentence becomes a question of law reviewable under the appellate jurisdiction of this court.’” ().
  • State of Louisiana v. Fred Christopher Beverly La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
  • State v. Whatley 867 So. 2d 955 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    "`[T]he excessiveness of a sentence becomes a question of law reviewable under the appellate jurisdiction of this court.'" ().
  • State v. Dykes 867 So. 2d 908 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
  • State v. Beverly 867 So. 2d 107 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
  • State v. Douglas 868 So. 2d 896 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
    State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), ; State v. Cushinello, 01-109 (La.App.
  • State v. Pierre 869 So. 2d 206 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
    However, the Louisiana Supreme Court recognized that a mandatory minimum sentence under the Habitual Offender Law may still be reviewed for constitutional excessiveness.
  • State v. Volgamore 865 So. 2d 237 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
  • State v. Cooper 864 So. 2d 892 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
  • State v. Moore 865 So. 2d 227 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
  • State v. Elzie 865 So. 2d 248 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
  • State v. Hampton 865 So. 2d 284 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
  • State v. Smith 868 So. 2d 794 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    State v. Johnson, 97-1906, pp. 5-6 (La.3/4/98)
  • State v. Guerra 865 So. 2d 154 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
  • State v. Converse 864 So. 2d 803 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
    (case citations omitted) (La.
  • State v. Swilley 862 So. 2d 1268 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
  • State v. Triche 864 So. 2d 832 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
  • State of Louisiana v. Christopher Ross La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
  • State v. Ross 861 So. 2d 888 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
  • State v. Lathen 862 So. 2d 1119 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
  • State v. Jarrett 862 So. 2d 440 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
  • State v. Fielding 862 So. 2d 420 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
  • State v. Hills 866 So. 2d 278 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
    15:529.1; State v. Johnson, 709 So.2d at 676.
  • State v. Johnson 864 So. 2d 645 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
    15:529.1; State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), ().
  • State v. Young 862 So. 2d 312 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
  • State v. Wallace 862 So. 2d 286 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    State v. Johnson, 97-1906, p. 6-7 (La.3/4/98), ; -81 (La.1993).
  • State v. Terrell 858 So. 2d 1282 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
    while finding that the Habitual Offender Law did not violate Louisiana’s constitutional separation of powers provision, the court stated: If ...
  • State v. Rogers 862 So. 2d 963 La. 2003
    see also State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), .
  • State v. Emanuel-Dunn 868 So. 2d 75 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    -1281 (La.1993), the Louisiana Supreme Court recognized that if a trial judge determines that the punishment mandated by the Habitual Offender Law makes no "measurable contribution to acceptable goals of punishment" or that the sentence amounts to nothing more than "the purposeful imposition of pain and suffering
  • State v. Wilson 859 So. 2d 957 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
    (case remanded to district court to determine whether minimum sentence mandated by Habitual Offender Law was unconstitutionally excessive).
  • State of Louisiana v. David Wayne Wilturner La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003