Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Dorthey, 623 So. 2d 1276.

2014 citing documents.

  • State v. Allen 844 So. 2d 1029 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
  • State v. Gaddis 839 So. 2d 1258 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
    State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98)
  • State v. Bentley 844 So. 2d 149 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
    *156 requires affirmance of the statutory sentence unless it makes no measurable contribution to acceptable goals of punishment or is nothing more than the purposeful imposition of pain and suffering and is grossly out of proportion to the severity of the crime.
  • State v. Bolton 844 So. 2d 135 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
    [17] State v. Johnson, supra
  • State v. Green 839 So. 2d 970 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
    State v. Walter Johnson, 97-1906 (La.03/04/98)
  • State v. Boykin 840 So. 2d 64 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
  • State v. Wright 839 So. 2d 1001 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
  • State v. Snow 839 So. 2d 988 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
  • State v. Raev 839 So. 2d 1015 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
  • State v. Parker 845 So. 2d 546 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    1 Cir. 6/25/99) , , writ denied, 99-2136 (La.6/16/00), , which outlined the criteria in State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), , which should be considered by the trial judge to depart downward from the mandatory minimum sentences in the habitual offender law.
  • State v. Hayes 845 So. 2d 542 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
  • State v. Terrase 841 So. 2d 947 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
  • State v. Davis 841 So. 2d 952 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
    [32] In this case, the trial court acted in response to defense counsel's request for leniency
  • State v. Ricks 841 So. 2d 60 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    15:529.1 to serve ten years at hard labor, the first two years without benefit of probation, parole
  • State v. Thomas 841 So. 2d 45 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    In sentencing, the defendant, the trial judge noted: I think the Court can take into consideration that the Legislature has seen fit to reduce these penalties, to bring this in under [State v.] Dorthey [1278-1279, ] 2 ...
  • State v. Graham 845 So. 2d 416 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
  • State v. Brooks 841 So. 2d 854 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
  • State v. Norris 837 So. 2d 723 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
  • State v. Hardy 836 So. 2d 1249 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
  • State v. Alvey 839 So. 2d 395 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    State v. Johnson, 97-1906, pp. 6-7 (La.3/4/98), ; -81 (La.1993).
  • State v. Simmons 839 So. 2d 239 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
    State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98)
  • State v. Harris 839 So. 2d 291 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
    1739 , 149 L.Ed.2d 663 (2001); State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98)
  • State v. Stevenson 839 So. 2d 340 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
    which held that a punishment required by statute may nonetheless constitute excessive punishment if it is a purposeless imposition of pain and suffering and is grossly disproportionate to the severity of the crime.
  • State v. Hernandez 839 So. 2d 281 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
    State v. Hernandez, 01-1147 (La App. 5 Cir. 3/13/02)
  • State v. Wilson 839 So. 2d 206 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
    State v. Johnson, 97-1906, pp. 6-7 (La.3/4/98), ; -81 (La.1993).
  • State v. Guerra 834 So. 2d 1206 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
  • State v. Wilson 833 So. 2d 560 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
    We note that upon remand, Defendant will be given the opportunity to argue that a and State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98); .
  • State v. James 833 So. 2d 1162 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
  • State v. Everidge 834 So. 2d 1197 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
  • State v. Cedars 832 So. 2d 1191 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
  • State v. Quiambao 833 So. 2d 1103 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
  • State v. Paddio 832 So. 2d 1120 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
  • State v. Robinson 833 So. 2d 1207 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
  • State v. Cooks 833 So. 2d 1034 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
  • State v. Decay 833 So. 2d 459 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98)
  • State v. Lewis 834 So. 2d 528 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    4 Cir. 7/10/02) , , (J. McKay, dissenting), this Court considered a case in which the defendant, convicted of distribution of cocaine, as a second offender to serve ten years at hard labor.
  • State v. Wilson 836 So. 2d 2 La. 2002
    (case remanded to district court to determine whether minimum sentence mandated by Habitual Offender Law was unconstitutionally excessive).
  • State v. Dallas 830 So. 2d 1113 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
  • State v. Prudhomme 829 So. 2d 1166 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
  • State v. Cho 831 So. 2d 433 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
  • State v. Robinson 831 So. 2d 460 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
    State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98)
  • State v. Gay 830 So. 2d 356 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
  • State v. Gay 830 So. 2d 356 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
  • State v. Floyd 830 So. 2d 384 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
  • State v. Wade 832 So. 2d 977 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
    State v. Johnson, supra .
  • State v. Bagneris 830 So. 2d 1047 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
  • State v. Yates 828 So. 2d 708 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
  • State v. Davis 829 So. 2d 554 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
    State v. Brooks, 01-864 (La.App.
  • State v. Wagley 828 So. 2d 116 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
  • State v. Gray 828 So. 2d 176 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002