Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Dorthey, 623 So. 2d 1276.

2014 citing documents.

  • State v. Wilturner 858 So. 2d 743 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
    2861, 2866 , 53 L.Ed.2d 982 (1977); State v. Handy, 96-2505, p. 1 (La.1/6/97)
  • State v. Howard 859 So. 2d 936 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
    Appellate counsel filed a brief in which he argued excessive sentence, contending that although the habitual offender sentence in effect at the date of the offense was mandatory life imprisonment
  • State v. Warfield 859 So. 2d 307 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
    Although, the Louisiana Supreme Court stated that courts have the power to declare a mandatory minimum sentence excessive under Article I, Section 20 of the Louisiana Constitution, this power should only be exercised in rare cases and only when the court is firmly convinced that the minimum sentence is excessive.
  • State v. Johnson 860 So. 2d 180 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
    State v. Davis, 02-387, p. 12 (La.App.
  • State v. Jackson 860 So. 2d 134 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
    State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98)
  • State v. Bates 859 So. 2d 841 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
  • State v. Fuller 859 So. 2d 215 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
  • State v. Hernandez 860 So. 2d 94 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    this Court stated: The record indicates that the trial court felt a sentence of ten years imprisonment would not be appropriate for this defendant and stated reasons for deviation, but did not find the minimum statutory sentence of ten years to be constitutionally excessive.
  • State v. Berniard 860 So. 2d 66 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
    In State v. Fobbs, 99-1024 (La.9/24/99), , 1275 , 1280 relative to downward departures from mandatory sentences in a habitual offender case is not limited to those sentences.
  • State v. Jackson 855 So. 2d 989 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
  • State v. Ceasar 856 So. 2d 236 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
    *243 App.2d Cir.8/23/00), , writ denied, 00-2726 (La.10/12/01), : Although, in State v. Dorthey, [ ] the Louisiana Supreme Court stated that courts have the power to declare a mandatory minimum sentence excessive under Article I, Section 20 of the Louisiana Constitution, this power should only be exercised in rare cases and only when the court is firmly convinced that the minimum sentence is excessive.
  • State v. King 856 So. 2d 243 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
    relative to any alleged miscarriage of justice in his sentencing.
  • State v. Felton 859 So. 2d 817 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    However, to which I find he is entitled to a ruling by the trial court in spite of the fact that he received a statutory minimum sentence.
  • State v. Houston 859 So. 2d 707 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
  • State v. Oliver 857 So. 2d 1227 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
    15:529.1; State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98)
  • State v. Royal 857 So. 2d 1167 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
  • State v. Brock 855 So. 2d 939 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
  • State v. Surry 855 So. 2d 893 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
    State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.03/04/98)
  • State v. Coleman 857 So. 2d 1085 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
  • State v. Dixon 858 So. 2d 16 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
  • State v. Lyles 858 So. 2d 35 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
    State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), ; State v. Cushinello, 01-109 (La.App.
  • State v. Crutchfield 855 So. 2d 822 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
  • State v. Dale 852 So. 2d 1167 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
  • State v. McCall 852 So. 2d 1162 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
  • State v. Brown 852 So. 2d 1234 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
  • State v. Bell 854 So. 2d 429 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
    State v. Johnson, 97-1906, pp. 6-7 (La.3/4/98)
  • State v. Fisher 852 So. 2d 1075 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
  • State v. Eason 850 So. 2d 1090 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
  • State v. Robinson 848 So. 2d 642 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
  • State v. Shaw 850 So. 2d 868 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
  • State v. Littleberry 850 So. 2d 1015 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
  • State v. Pierre 854 So. 2d 945 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
  • State v. White 850 So. 2d 751 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
  • State v. Odell 850 So. 2d 749 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
  • State v. Roland 850 So. 2d 738 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
  • State v. Augillard 853 So. 2d 17 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
  • State v. Dupre 848 So. 2d 149 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
    State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98)
  • State v. Combs 848 So. 2d 672 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
    State v. Johnson, 97-1906, pp. 6-7 (La.3/4/98), ; -81 (La.1993).
  • State v. Edison 847 So. 2d 140 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
  • State v. Lee 847 So. 2d 83 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
  • State v. Simmons 848 So. 2d 58 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
    4 Cir. 1/31/96) , , (La.
  • State v. Logwood 847 So. 2d 115 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
  • State v. Esteen 846 So. 2d 167 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
  • State v. Jerome 845 So. 2d 1194 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
  • State v. Orange 845 So. 2d 570 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
  • State v. Green 842 So. 2d 1208 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
  • State v. Howard 842 So. 2d 1233 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
  • State v. Mandosia 842 So. 2d 1252 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
  • State v. Durden 842 So. 2d 1244 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
    the court found that a punishment required by statute can be shown to be an excessive punishment, the appellate courts of this state have recognized that declaring a sentence under the Habitual Offender Law constitutionally excessive should be a rare act, not a commonplace practice.
  • State v. Anderson 842 So. 2d 1222 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003