Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Dorthey, 623 So. 2d 1276.
-
State v. Wilturner
858 So. 2d 743
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
2861, 2866 , 53 L.Ed.2d 982 (1977); State v. Handy, 96-2505, p. 1 (La.1/6/97)
-
State v. Howard
859 So. 2d 936
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
Appellate counsel filed a brief in which he argued excessive sentence, contending that although the habitual offender sentence in effect at the date of the offense was mandatory life imprisonment
-
State v. Warfield
859 So. 2d 307
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
Although, the Louisiana Supreme Court stated that courts have the power to declare a mandatory minimum sentence excessive under Article I, Section 20 of the Louisiana Constitution, this power should only be exercised in rare cases and only when the court is firmly convinced that the minimum sentence is excessive.
-
State v. Johnson
860 So. 2d 180
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
State v. Davis, 02-387, p. 12 (La.App.
-
State v. Jackson
860 So. 2d 134
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98)
- State v. Bates 859 So. 2d 841 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
- State v. Fuller 859 So. 2d 215 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
-
State v. Hernandez
860 So. 2d 94
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
this Court stated: The record indicates that the trial court felt a sentence of ten years imprisonment would not be appropriate for this defendant and stated reasons for deviation, but did not find the minimum statutory sentence of ten years to be constitutionally excessive.
-
State v. Berniard
860 So. 2d 66
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
In State v. Fobbs, 99-1024 (La.9/24/99), , 1275 , 1280 relative to downward departures from mandatory sentences in a habitual offender case is not limited to those sentences.
- State v. Jackson 855 So. 2d 989 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
-
State v. Ceasar
856 So. 2d 236
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
*243 App.2d Cir.8/23/00), , writ denied, 00-2726 (La.10/12/01), : Although, in State v. Dorthey, [ ] the Louisiana Supreme Court stated that courts have the power to declare a mandatory minimum sentence excessive under Article I, Section 20 of the Louisiana Constitution, this power should only be exercised in rare cases and only when the court is firmly convinced that the minimum sentence is excessive.
-
State v. King
856 So. 2d 243
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
relative to any alleged miscarriage of justice in his sentencing.
-
State v. Felton
859 So. 2d 817
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
However, to which I find he is entitled to a ruling by the trial court in spite of the fact that he received a statutory minimum sentence.
- State v. Houston 859 So. 2d 707 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
-
State v. Oliver
857 So. 2d 1227
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
15:529.1; State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98)
- State v. Royal 857 So. 2d 1167 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
- State v. Brock 855 So. 2d 939 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
-
State v. Surry
855 So. 2d 893
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.03/04/98)
- State v. Coleman 857 So. 2d 1085 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
- State v. Dixon 858 So. 2d 16 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
-
State v. Lyles
858 So. 2d 35
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), ; State v. Cushinello, 01-109 (La.App.
- State v. Crutchfield 855 So. 2d 822 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
- State v. Dale 852 So. 2d 1167 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
- State v. McCall 852 So. 2d 1162 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
- State v. Brown 852 So. 2d 1234 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
-
State v. Bell
854 So. 2d 429
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
State v. Johnson, 97-1906, pp. 6-7 (La.3/4/98)
- State v. Fisher 852 So. 2d 1075 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
- State v. Eason 850 So. 2d 1090 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
- State v. Robinson 848 So. 2d 642 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
- State v. Shaw 850 So. 2d 868 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
- State v. Littleberry 850 So. 2d 1015 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
- State v. Pierre 854 So. 2d 945 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
- State v. White 850 So. 2d 751 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
- State v. Odell 850 So. 2d 749 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
- State v. Roland 850 So. 2d 738 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
- State v. Augillard 853 So. 2d 17 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
-
State v. Dupre
848 So. 2d 149
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98)
-
State v. Combs
848 So. 2d 672
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
State v. Johnson, 97-1906, pp. 6-7 (La.3/4/98), ; -81 (La.1993).
- State v. Edison 847 So. 2d 140 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
- State v. Lee 847 So. 2d 83 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
-
State v. Simmons
848 So. 2d 58
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
4 Cir. 1/31/96) , , (La.
- State v. Logwood 847 So. 2d 115 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
- State v. Esteen 846 So. 2d 167 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
- State v. Jerome 845 So. 2d 1194 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
- State v. Orange 845 So. 2d 570 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
- State v. Green 842 So. 2d 1208 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
- State v. Howard 842 So. 2d 1233 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
- State v. Mandosia 842 So. 2d 1252 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
-
State v. Durden
842 So. 2d 1244
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
the court found that a punishment required by statute can be shown to be an excessive punishment, the appellate courts of this state have recognized that declaring a sentence under the Habitual Offender Law constitutionally excessive should be a rare act, not a commonplace practice.
- State v. Anderson 842 So. 2d 1222 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003