DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Dorthey, 623 So. 2d 1276.

2014 citing documents.

  • State v. Darnell 243 So. 3d 1162 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
  • State v. Jackson 243 So. 3d 1093 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
    He contends that the sentencing options should be limited to only life without parole (for "the rare juvenile offender whose crime reflects irreparable corruption"), Craig -relief (resentencing to the most serious penalty for the next lesser included offense, manslaughter in the instant case), or Dorthey -relief (resentencing under State v. Dorthey , (La.
  • State v. Lee 243 So. 3d 1133 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
  • State v. McDonald 243 So. 3d 1188 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
    9/10/93), ; State v. Bonanno , (La.
  • State v. Harrison 244 So. 3d 595 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
  • State v. Mahogany 225 So. 3d 489 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
  • State v. Johnson 224 So. 3d 505 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
  • State of Louisiana v. Thayer Green 225 So. 3d 1033 La. 2017
    Further, (1993), and State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.
  • State v. Jack 224 So. 3d 492 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
  • State v. Mosley 223 So. 3d 158 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
    01/14/03), 839 So,2d 1; (La.
  • State v. Bass 223 So. 3d 1242 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
  • State v. Keith 223 So. 3d 767 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
    In his second assignment of error, Keith argues he' was denied a meaningful sentencing hearing in which to present miti *772 (La.
  • State of Louisiana v. Justin Seawright La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
    “‘[T]he excessiveness of a sentence becomes a question of law reviewable under the appellate jurisdiction of this court.’” ().
  • State v. Nixon 222 So. 3d 123 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
  • State of Louisiana v. Bill Eric Winters La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
    In State v. Dorthey, [], this Court recognized that this power extends to the minimum sentences mandated by the Habitual Offender Law.
  • State v. Winters 221 So. 3d 159 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
    In State v. Dorthey, [ ], this Court recognized that this power extends to the minimum sentences mandated by the Habitual Offender Law.
  • State v. Brown 223 So. 3d 88 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
  • State v. Fleming 219 So. 3d 499 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
  • State v. McCasland 218 So. 3d 1119 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
  • State v. Dickerson 218 So. 3d 633 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
  • State v. Purvis 217 So. 3d 620 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
  • State v. Boehm 217 So. 3d 596 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
  • State v. Calhoun 216 So. 3d 1101 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
  • State v. Jones 214 So. 3d 124 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
  • State v. Stock 212 So. 3d 1268 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
  • State v. Sullivan 216 So. 3d 175 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
  • State v. Lapoole 215 So. 3d 430 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
    1/14/03), ; State v. Miles, 48,-830 (La-App.
  • State v. Davis 215 So. 3d 434 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
    Const. Art. I, § 20; (La.
  • State v. Lee 216 So. 3d 205 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
  • State v. Jackson 211 So. 3d 639 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
    Const. Art. I, § 20; (La.
  • State v. Breedlove 213 So. 3d 1195 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
  • State v. Campbell 210 So. 3d 508 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
    (1993) (“Louisiana’s judiciary maintains the distinct responsibility of reviewing sentences imposed in criminal cases for constitutional exces-siveness.”) (citing La.
  • State v. Ross 207 So. 3d 511 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
  • State v. Johnson 207 So. 3d 1101 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
    A sentence is excessive and therefore unconstitutional if “it makes no measurable contribution to acceptable goals of punishment and is nothing more than the purposeless imposition of pain and suffering and is grossly out of proportion to the severity of the crime.” (La.
  • State v. Farris 210 So. 3d 877 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
  • State v. Christopher 209 So. 3d 255 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
  • State of Louisiana v. William Chester Farry Jr. AKA William Chester Farry AKA William C. Farry AKA William … La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
    Thus, the Defendant requests this matter be remanded to the trial court for a hearing on whether or not a
  • State v. Ward 209 So. 3d 228 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
  • State v. Farry 207 So. 3d 436 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
    Thus, the Defendant requests this matter be remanded to the trial court for a hearing on whether or not a
  • State v. Scott 209 So. 3d 248 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
  • State v. Moody 209 So. 3d 264 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
    01/14/03), ; State *268 v. Dorthey, (La.
  • State v. Thomas 209 So. 3d 234 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
  • State v. Turk 210 So. 3d 402 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
  • State v. George 204 So. 3d 704 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
  • State v. Morin 203 So. 3d 1115 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
  • State v. Morin 203 So. 3d 1109 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
  • State v. Hagans 202 So. 3d 475 La. 2016
    I write separately to express my view that Judge Camille Buras’ was eminently correct and, at the very least, does not warrant our supervisory jurisdiction.
  • State of Louisiana v. Robert E. Smith La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
    and State v. Berniard, 03-484 (La.App.
  • State v. Smith 204 So. 3d 1003 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
    and State v. Berniard, 03-484 (La.App.
  • State of Louisiana v. Steven Blunt AKA Steven L. Blunt La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
    “ ‘[T]he excessiveness of a sentence becomes a question of law reviewable under the appellate jurisdiction of this court.’ ” ().