DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Dorthey, 623 So. 2d 1276.

2014 citing documents.

  • State v. Blunt 201 So. 3d 358 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
    “‘[T]he ex-cessiveness of a sentence becomes a question of law reviewable under the appellate jurisdiction of this court.’” ().
  • State v. Jackson 206 So. 3d 1099 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
  • State v. Lawson 206 So. 3d 1112 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
    1/14/03), ; State v. Shoupe, 46,395 (La.App.
  • State v. Williams 207 So. 3d 552 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
  • State v. Allen 206 So. 3d 1093 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
  • State v. Flowers 204 So. 3d 271 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
  • State v. Eley 203 So. 3d 462 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
    -81 (La.1993), the Louisiana Supreme Court opined that if a trial judge were to And that the punishment mandated by La.
  • State v. Jones 201 So. 3d 997 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
  • State v. Little 200 So. 3d 400 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
  • State v. Allen 200 So. 3d 376 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
    |14 and State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.03/04/98), , the Louisiana Supreme Court addressed the issue of mandatory sentences in the context of the habitual offender law.
  • State v. Cotten 201 So. 3d 299 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
  • State v. Sule 200 So. 3d 396 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
  • State of Louisiana v. Dominick Sims 195 So. 3d 441 La. 2016
    Const. art. III, § 1; (La.
  • State v. Johnston 198 So. 3d 151 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
  • State v. Blake 198 So. 3d 181 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
  • State v. Butler 197 So. 3d 179 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
    State v. Smith, 01-2574 (La.1/14/03), ; State v. Shoupe, 46,395 (La.App.
  • State v. Lynn 196 So. 3d 607 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
  • State v. Conway 196 So. 3d 635 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
    Const. Art. 1, § 20 if it is grossly out of proportion to the seriousness of the offense or nothing more than a purposeless and needless infliction of pain and suffering
  • State v. Hampton 195 So. 3d 548 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
  • State v. Murphy 194 So. 3d 65 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
    The defendant filed a motion for deviation from mandatory sentencing, requesting that the trial court, deviate from the mandatory minimum sentence requirement under the Habitual Offender Act.
  • State v. Isidore 193 So. 3d 1171 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
    -81 (La.1993), the Louisiana Supreme Court opined that if a trial judge were to find that the punishment mandated by La.
  • State v. Foster 194 So. 3d 674 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
  • State v. Ladd 192 So. 3d 235 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
    the defendant argues that sentences which amount to purposeless imposition of pain and suffering and are grossly out of proportion to the severity of the crime are constitutionally excessive.
  • State v. DeBerry 194 So. 3d 657 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
  • State v. Kennon 194 So. 3d 661 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
    State v. Guzman, 99-1753 (La.05/16/00)
  • State v. Wells 191 So. 3d 1127 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
    1 “A punishment is constitutionally excessive if it makes no measurable contribution to acceptable goals of punishment and is nothing more than the purposeless imposition of pain and suffering and is grossly out" of proportion to the severity of the crime.” (internal citation omitted); see also La.
  • State v. Collier 194 So. 3d 25 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
  • State v. Eby 248 So. 3d 420 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
    Weaver , 805 So.2d at 174 ; , 1280 (La.
  • State v. Washington 188 So. 3d 350 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
  • State v. Ellis 190 So. 3d 354 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
    Johnson, 97-1906, 709 So.2d at 676 (-81 (La.1993)).
  • State v. Thompson 189 So. 3d 1139 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
    State v. Smith, 01-2574 (La.1/14/03)
  • State v. Lindsey 189 So. 3d 1104 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
  • State v. Johnson 188 So. 3d 291 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
  • State v. Miller 189 So. 3d 1160 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
  • State v. Shelton 188 So. 3d 304 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
  • State v. McCorvey 187 So. 3d 41 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
    15:529.1 was unconstitutionally excessive
  • State v. Turner 186 So. 3d 720 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
  • State v. Washington 185 So. 3d 852 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
    State v. Lewis, 49,138 (La.App.2d Cir.6/25/14), .
  • State v. Love 185 So. 3d 136 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
    State v. Dorthey, 92-3120 (La.9/10/93)
  • State v. Smith 184 So. 3d 241 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
  • State v. Miller 185 So. 3d 811 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
  • State v. Mosby 180 So. 3d 1274 La. 2015
  • State v. Houston 181 So. 3d 188 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
  • State v. Hebert 181 So. 3d 795 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
  • State v. Davis 181 So. 3d 200 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
  • State v. Johnson 178 So. 3d 1140 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
  • State v. Manning 182 So. 3d 243 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
    State v. Fatheree, 46,686 (La.App.2d Cir.11/2/11), .
  • State v. Johnson 182 So. 3d 1039 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
  • State v. Barbain 179 So. 3d 770 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    4 Cir. 3/18/16) (); see also Hamdalla, 12-1413 at p. 14, 126 So.3d at 626.
  • State of Louisiana v. Jessie M. Griffin, II 180 So. 3d 1262 La. 2015
    (1993) (“Louisiana‟s judiciary maintains the distinct responsibility of reviewing sentences imposed in criminal cases for constitutional excessiveness.”) (citing La.