Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Brown v. Drillers, Inc., 630 So. 2d 741.

198 citing documents.

Scheuermann v. Cadillac of Metairie, Inc. 112 So. 3d 1060 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Brown v. Drillers Inc., 93-1019 (La.1/14/94), .
St. Bernard I, LLC v. Williams 112 So. 3d 922 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
" Brown v. Drillers, Inc., quoting La.
Farris v. Kolb 135 So. 3d 674 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
Holloway Drilling Equipment, Inc. v. Danielle Bodin La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
Holloway Drilling Equipment, Inc. v. Bodin 107 So. 3d 699 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Brown [v. Drillers, Inc., 93-1019 (La.1/14/94), ,] 748.
Rudolph v. D.R.D. Towing Co. 94 So. 3d 21 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Brown v. Drillers, Inc., 93-1019 (La.1/14/94), n. 7 ; Ortego v. State, Dep’t of Transp.
Chadwick F. Montgomery v. Russell Lee Montgomery, III La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
Brown v. Drillers Inc., 93-1019 (La.1/14/94)
Montgomery v. Montgomery 87 So. 3d 376 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Brown v. Drillers Inc., 93-1019 (La.1/14/94), .
Ocmand v. Lubrano 78 So. 3d 783 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
2 Cir. 12/10/08), , writ denied, 09-0235 (La.3/27/09), citing Brown v. Drillers, Inc., 93-1019 (La.1/14/94), .
Donna Tyson v. Thompson Home Health La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
Tyson v. Thompson Home Health 59 So. 3d 509 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
8 Cir. 2/6/08), (citing Brown v. Drillers, Inc., 93-1019 (La.1/14/94), ).
Mackie Roofing v. Robinson 52 So. 3d 141 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
3 Cir. 2/6/08), , 262 citing Brown v. Drillers, Inc., 93-109 p. 7 (La.1/14/94), .
Stephenson v. Petrohawk Properties, L.P. 37 So. 3d 1145 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
Brown v. Drillers, Inc., 93-1019 (La.1/14/94), .
Hancock Bank of Louisiana v. Holmes 40 So. 3d 1131 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Brown v. Drillers Inc., 93-1019 (La.1/14/94), .
Red River Waterway Commission v. Succession of Fry 36 So. 3d 401 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
art. 3078; Brown v. Drillers, Inc., 93-1019 (La.1/14/94), .
RJAM, INC. v. Miletello 44 So. 3d 283 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
Rogers v. Horseshoe Entertainment, 32,800 (La.App.2d Cir.08/01/00), , writs denied 2000-2894 (La.12/08/00), and 2000-2905 (La.12/08/00), ; Brown v. Drillers, Inc., 1993-1019 (La.01/14/94), .
Edward Signal, Jr. v. Jared Romero La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
SIGNAL v. Romero 32 So. 3d 1126 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Brown v. Drillers, Inc., 93-1019 (La.1/14/94), .
Payan v. FRANCIS CHIMENTO ENTERPRISES, INC. 34 So. 3d 351 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Claimant argues that the burden of proof is on defendants to establish the requisites for a valid compromise, including the parties’ intent to settle the differences being asserted in the action in which it is interposed, citing Brown v. Drillers, Inc., 93-1019 (La.1/14/94), .
Palmer v. Walker 31 So. 3d 443 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Brown, v. Drillers, Inc., , 747 n. 7 (La.1994).
Chalmette Retail Center, L.L.C. v. Lafayette Insurance Co. 21 So. 3d 485 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Brown v. Drillers, Inc., 93-1019 (La.1994), .
Spectrum Automotive Finishes, Inc. v. Westbank Body Works, Inc. 27 So. 3d 875 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
art. 1848; Brown v. Drillers, Inc., 93-1019 (La.1/14/94), .
Jonnie Buford v. Leah Blanchard La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
1/14/94), -750 (footnotes omitted), discussed the interpretation of settlement contracts: LSA-C.C.
Buford v. Blanchard 19 So. 3d 1255 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Brown v. Drillers, Inc., 93-1019, pp. 17-22 (La.1/14/94), -750 (footnotes omitted), discussed the interpretation of settlement contracts: LSA-C.C.
Hines v. Smith 16 So. 3d 1234 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
Brown v. Drillers, Inc., 93-1019 (La.1/14/94), .
Raymond v. Video Inspection Services, Inc. 16 So. 3d 439 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Tyler v. Roger 11 So. 3d 1243 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Burge v. NORTH. NAT. INS. CO. OF MILWAUKEE 14 So. 3d 616 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2009
Brown v. Drillers, Inc., 93-1019 (La.1/14/94), .
Burge v. Northwestern National Insurance Co. of Milwaukee 14 So. 3d 616 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
4 “It follows that the compromise instrument is the law between the parties and must be interpreted according to the parties’ true intent.” Brown, v. Drillers, Inc., 93-1019 (La.1/14/94), .
Hymel v. Eagle, Inc. 7 So. 3d 1249 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2009
Brown v. Drillers Inc., 93-1019 (La.1/14/94), ; Rivett v. State Farm Fire & Cas.
Donna Tyson v. Thompson Home Health La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
Brown v. Drillers, Inc., 93-1019 (La.1/14/94)
Tyson v. Thompson Home Health 3 So. 3d 517 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
Brown v. Drillers, Inc., 93-1019 (La.1/14/94), .
Hudson v. Progressive Security Insurance Co. 1 So. 3d 627 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
Brown v. Drillers, Inc., 93-1019 (La.1/14/94), .
Creamer Brother's Inc. v. Hicks 998 So. 2d 846 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
art. 1848; Campbell, supra; Brown v. Drillers, Inc., 93-1019 (La.1/14/94), .
Maria Guadalupe Reyes-Ramirez v. Progressive Security Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
REYES-RAMIREZ v. Progressive SEC. Ins. Co. 996 So. 2d 1213 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
La.Civ.Code art. 3071; Brown v. Drillers, Inc., 93-1019 (La.1/14/94), .
Weldon Vitto, Sr. v. Donald Ray Davis La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
Vitto v. Davis 996 So. 2d 550 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
Brown v. Drillers, Inc., 93-1019 (La.1/14/94), .
Encompass Insurance Co. v. Gammon Roofing, L.L.C. 996 So. 2d 16 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
a contract can be construed from the four corners of the instrument without looking to extrinsic evidence, the question of contractual interpretation is answered as a matter of law and summary judgment is appropriate.” Brown v. Drillers, Inc., 93-1019 (La.1/14/94), -750 (citations omitted).
Roccaforte v. WING ZONE, INC. 994 So. 2d 126 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
art. 3076 [2] ; Trahan, 04-0100 at p. 15, 894 So.2d at 1107; Ortego , 96-1322 at p. 7, 689 So.2d at 1363 ; Brown v. Drillers, Inc., 93-1019, p. 7 (La.1/14/94), .
Gerald Taylor v. Hathorn Transfer & Storage La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
Taylor v. HATHORN TRANSFER & STORAGE 976 So. 2d 259 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
Brown v. Drillers, Inc., 93-1019, p. 7 (La.1/14/94), .
State of Louisiana, Through the Sabine River Authority v. Meyer & Associates, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
State ex rel. Sabine River Authority v. Meyer & Associates, Inc. 967 So. 2d 585 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
Brown v. Drillers, Inc., 93-1019 (La.1/14/94), .
Bank One, NA v. Payton 968 So. 2d 202 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
See, Brown v. Drillers, Inc., 93-1019 (La.1/14/94), ; 748-749: The meaning and intent of the parties to a written instrument, including a compromise, is ordinarily determined from the four corners of the instrument, and extrinsic (parol) evidence is inadmissible either to explain or contradict the terms of the instrument.
Sims v. BFI WASTE SERVICES, LLC 964 So. 2d 998 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
See Brown v. Drillers, Inc., 93-1019 (La.1/14/94), , and Dean v. Griffin Crane & Steel, Inc., 05-1226, p. 7 (La.App.
Marsh v. USAgencies Cas. Ins. Co. 957 So. 2d 901 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
Brown v. Drillers, XXXX-XXXX (La.01/14/94), .
Peeler v. Dural 958 So. 2d 31 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
Brown v. Drillers, 93-1019, p. 6 (La.01/14/94), ; Hamsa v. Hamsa, 05-219, p. 5 (La.App.
Lee v. Lee 945 So. 2d 317 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
Brown v. Drillers Inc., 93-1019 (La.1/14/94), .
Roberson v. DJD, INC. 933 So. 2d 795 La. 2006
See Brown v. Drillers Inc., 93-1019 (La.1/14/94), .