Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Pierre, 631 So. 2d 427.

134 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Alonzo D. Ragsdale La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2025
State of Louisiana v. Donald Briggs, III A/K/A Donald Briggs La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2025
The shooter’s specific intent cannot be transferred to the principal; “[a]n individual may only be convicted as a principal for those crimes for which he personally has the requisite mental state.” State v. Pierre, 93– 0893 at p. 4 (La.2/3/94), –27 (La.1980)(reasoning that “[p]roof of one person’s intent is not proof of another’s” and thus that to find non-shooter liable state was require to establish “the circumstances indicated that [non- shooter] also actively desired the death of or great b
State of Louisiana Versus Willie H. Battle La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2024
2/3/94), State v. King, 06-554 (La.
State of Louisiana Versus Antonio Dante Key La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2023
2/3/94), State v. King, 06-554 (La.
State of Louisiana in the Interest of R.B. Vs. La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2022
State of Louisiana Versus Teddy Chester La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2021
2/3/94); State v. King, 06- 19-KA-363 27 554 (La.
State of Louisiana v. Brent M. Braneon Sr. La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2020
State v. Williams 266 So. 3d 485 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2019
State v. Kitts 250 So. 3d 939 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
2/3/94), , 428 (per curiam).
State v. Nixon 250 So. 3d 273 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
2/3/94), , 428 (per curiam).
State v. Mahogany 225 So. 3d 489 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
2/3/94), (quoting Mussall, supra) (quoting 2 C. Wright, FEDERAL PRACTICE & PROCEDURE, CRIMINAL 2d, § 467 (2d ed. 1982)); see also State v. Macon, 06-481, p. 8 (La.
State of Louisiana v. Chadwick McGhee 223 So. 3d 1136 La. 2017
2/3/94), (“Mere presence at the scene is .
State v. Dyson 222 So. 3d 220 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
State v. Brown 173 So. 3d 1262 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
State v. Pierre, 93-0893 (La.2/3/94), .
State v. White 174 So. 3d 177 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
State v. Pierre, 93-0893 (La.2/3/94), .
State v. Jones 166 So. 3d 406 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
State v. Spencer 151 So. 3d 816 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
“Mere presence at the scene is therefore not enough to ‘concern’ an individual in the crime.” State v. Pierre, 93-0893 (La.2/3/94), ; State v. Quac Tran, 08-1103, p. 10 (La.App.
State v. Brooks 139 So. 3d 1072 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
State v. Huey 142 So. 3d 27 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
See State v. Pierre, 93-0893 (La.2/3/94), (per curiam ).
State of Louisiana v. Corey W. Oliphant La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
State of Louisiana v. Jody D. Hamilton La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
State v. Oliphant 127 So. 3d 91 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Therefore, “[mjere presence at the scene is therefore not enough to ‘concern’ an individual in the crime.” State v. Pierre, 93-893 (La.2/3/94), .
State v. Hamilton 127 So. 3d 76 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Pierre, 93-0893 (La.2/3/94); .
State v. Johnson 135 So. 3d 705 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
State v. Pierre, 93-0893 (La.2/3/94), .
State v. Gross 110 So. 3d 1173 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Pierre, 93-893 (La.2/3/94), ; State v. King, 06-554 (La.App.
State v. Mason 109 So. 3d 429 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
State v. Davis 111 So. 3d 100 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
See State v. Pierre, 93-0893 (La.2/3/94), (per curiam).
State v. Bone 107 So. 3d 49 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State v. Pierre, 93-0893, p. 4 (La.2/3/94), (per curiam).
State v. Massey 91 So. 3d 453 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State v. Pierre, 93-0893, p. 4 (La.2/3/94), (per curiam).
State v. Johnson 91 So. 3d 365 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State v. Pierre, 93-893, p. 4 (La.2/3/94), ; State v. King, 06-554, pp. 7-8 (La.App.
State v. Cooks 81 So. 3d 932 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
“The shooter’s specific intent [to kill] cannot be transferred to the principal; ‘[a]n individual may only be convicted as a principal for those crimes for which he personally has the requisite mental state.’ ” Bridgewater , 2000-1529, pp. 10-11, 823 So.2d at 890 , quoting State v. Pierre, 93-0893, p. 4 (La.2/3/94), (emphasis added).
State v. Cunningham 77 So. 3d 477 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
State v. Pierre, 93-0893 (La.2/3/94), .
State v. Lewis 74 So. 3d 254 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
State v. Jacobs 67 So. 3d 535 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Pierre, 93-0893, p. 4 (La.2/3/94), (per cu- *552 riam).
State v. Hampton 69 So. 3d 614 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
State v. Wiley 68 So. 3d 583 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
“Only those persons who knowingly participate in planning or execution of a crime are principals.” State v. Pierre, 93-893, p. 4 (La.2/3/94), .
State v. Wright 61 So. 3d 88 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Pierre, 93-893, p. 4 (La.2/3/94), ; State v. King, 06-554, pp. 7-8 (La.App.
State v. Fernandez 50 So. 3d 219 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
That standard “preserves the role of the jury as the factfinder in the case but it does not allow jurors ‘to speculate if the evidence is such that reasonable jurors must have a reasonable doubt.’ ” State v. Pierre, 93-0893 at p. 5 (La.2/3/94), .
State v. Collins 43 So. 3d 244 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
11fiHowever, “[m]ere presence at the scene is not enough to ‘concern’ an individual in the crime.” State v. Pierre, 93-0893 (La.2/3/94), .
State v. Greene 26 So. 3d 274 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
That standard “preserves the role of the jury as the factfinder in the case but it does not allow jurors ‘to speculate if the evidence is such that reasonable jurors must have a reasonable doubt.’ ” State v. Pierre, 93-0893 at p. 5 (La.2/3/94), .
State v. Page 28 So. 3d 442 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
State v. Pierre, 93-893, p. 4 (La.2/3/94), ; State v. King, 06-554, pp. 7-8 (La.App.
State v. Griffin 17 So. 3d 519 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
State v. QUAC TRAN 18 So. 3d 165 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
That standard “preserves the role of the jury as the factfinder in the case but it does not allow jurors ‘to speculate if the evidence is such that reasonable jurors must have a reasonable doubt.’ ” State v. Pierre, 93-0893 at p. 5 (La.2/3/94), .
State v. Smith 13 So. 3d 570 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
State v. Pierre, 93-0893 (La.2/3/94), .
State v. Gaines 998 So. 2d 227 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
State v. Pierre, 93-0893 (La.2/3/94), ; State v. Mitchell, supra.
State v. Butler 997 So. 2d 631 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
State v. Pierre, 93-893, p. 4 (La.2/3/94)
State in the Interest of D.J. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
State ex rel. D.J. 995 So. 2d 1 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
State v. Pierre, 93-0893 (La.2/3/94), .
State Ex Rel. Dj 995 So. 2d 1 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
State v. Pierre, 93-0893 (La.2/3/94), .
State v. Oliphant 980 So. 2d 905 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008