Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Martin, 645 So. 2d 190.

180 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Gary Allen La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2025
10/17/94), (citation omitted).
State of Louisiana v. Demeccio Caston La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2025
Lanard Lavigne Versus State of Louisiana La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2025
10/17/94), see also, Byrne, 483 So.2d at 1357; Soler, 636 So.2d at 1082 (“Before reversing a jury verdict because of a prosecutor’s closing remarks…the appellate court must be convinced the objectionable statements were so inflammatory or prejudicial that they influenced or contributed to the guilty verdict.
State of Louisiana v. Darren Bridges La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2024
See State v. Martin, 93–0285, p. 17 (La.10/17/94)
State Of Louisiana v. Jude Everette Boudreaux La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2024
State of Louisiana v. Samuel M. Hunter Jr La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2023
State of Louisiana v. Jewel Demon Humphrey La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
State v. Koon, 96–1208, p. 34 (La.5/20/97), State v. Martin, 93–0285, p. 14 (La.10/17/94)
State of Louisiana v. Sedrick R. Tennessee La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
State of Louisiana v. Darrione Kentrell Bell La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
State v. Koon, 96-1208, p. 34 (La.5/20/97), State v. Martin, 93–0285, p. 14 (La.10/17/94)
State of Louisiana v. Eddie Ray Jackson, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
State v. Koon, 96–1208, p. 34 (La.5/20/97), State v. Martin, 93–0285, p. 14 (La.10/17/94)
State of Louisiana v. Freddy Lee Williams La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
State Of Louisiana v. David H. Brown (Parish of Lafourche) Convictions Affirmed; Death Sentences Reversed; Case Remanded For … La. 2021
10/17/94), ); State v. Perry , –59 (La.
State Of Louisiana v. Elzie Ball La. 2020
10/17/94), the court found that the failure of one aggravating factor does not invalidate a death penalty sentence if another aggravating circumstance is supported by the record.
State of Louisiana v. Matthew R. Dotson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
The admission of “gruesome photographs is not reversible error unless it is clear that their probative value is substantially outweighed by their prejudicial effect.” State v. Broaden, 99-2124, p. 23 (La.2/21/01), quoting State v. Martin, 93-0285, pp. 14-15 (La.10/17/94)
State v. Dotson 257 So. 3d 229 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
State v. Broaden , 99-2124, p. 23 (La.2/21/01), , 364, quoting State v. Martin , 93-0285, pp. 14-15 (La.10/17/94), , 198.
State v. Folse 258 So. 3d 53 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
State v. Folse 258 So. 3d 188 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
State v. Domingue 244 So. 3d 489 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
State of Louisiana v. Michael Adam Domingue La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
State v. Brazell 245 So. 3d 15 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
State of Louisiana v. Jermaine Christopher Obrien AKA Jermaine Christopher O'Brien La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
State v. Martin, 1993–285 p. 24 18 (La.10/17/94), cert.
State v. Obrien 242 So. 3d 1254 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
State v. Martin, 1993-285 p. 18 (La.10/17/94), , 200, cert.
State v. Raine 238 So. 3d 1076 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
10/17/94), , 200 ; State v. Jarman , , 1188 (La.
State v. Handy 226 So. 3d 1182 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
State v. Lee 217 So. 3d 1266 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
State of Louisiana v. Jeffrey Clark 220 So. 3d 583 La. 2016
State v. Mickelson 210 So. 3d 893 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
State of Louisiana v. Marcus Donte Reed 200 So. 3d 291 La. 2016
State v. Franklin 198 So. 3d 1222 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
See State v. Martin, 93-0285, p. 17 (La.10/17/94), ; (La.
State v. Cole 182 So. 3d 1192 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Frank, 957 So.2d at 741 ; See also State v. Martin, 93-0285 (La.10/17/94), .
State ex rel. Murray v. State 183 So. 3d 497 La. 2015
See State v. Martin, 93-0285, p. 18 (La.10/17/94), .
State v. Mack 162 So. 3d 1284 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
The admission of “gruesome photographs is not reversible error unless it is clear that their probative value is substantially outweighed by their prejudicial effect.” State v. Broaden, 99-2124, p. 23 (La.2/21/01), , quoting State v. Martin, 93-0285, pp. 14-15 (La.10/17/94), .
State of Louisiana v. Eric Dale Mickelson La. 2014
State v. Mills 153 So. 3d 481 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
See State v. Martin, 93-0285 (La.10/17/94), , cert.
State v. Simms 143 So. 3d 1258 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State v. Hoffman, 98-3118, p. 45 (La.4/11/00), ; State v. Martin, 93-0285, p. 18 (La.10/17/94)
State of Louisiana v. Alcide Hypolite La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
State v. Hypolite 139 So. 3d 687 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State v. Martin, 1993-285 p. 18 (La.10/17/94), , cert.
State v. Williams 137 So. 3d 832 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State v. Martin, 93-0285, p. 18 (La.10/17/94), .
State of Louisiana v. Lawrence Lafleur La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
State v. Lafleur 134 So. 3d 167 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State v. Martin, 93-285 (La.10/17/94), , cert.
State v. Hampton 136 So. 3d 240 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
(citing State v. Martin, 93-285, p. 18 (La.10/17/94), ).
State v. Hamdan 131 So. 3d 197 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
See State v. Martin, 93-0285, p. 7 (La.10/17/94), , for a discussion of the "corpus delicti rule” which Mr. Hamdan references in his pro se brief.
State v. Diggins 126 So. 3d 770 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
“[E]ven if the prosecutor exceeds these bounds, the court will not reverse a conviction unless ‘thoroughly convinced’ that the argument influenced the jury and contributed to the verdict.” Casey , 99-0023 at p. 17, 775 So.2d at 1036 ; see also State v. Martin, 93-0285, p. 17 (La.10/17/94)
State v. Allen 126 So. 3d 675 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Likewise, “even if the prosecutor exceeds these bounds, the court will not reverse a conviction unless ‘thoroughly convinced’ that the argument influenced the jury and contributed to the verdict.” State v. Casey, 99-0023, p. 17, 775 So.2d at 1036 (citing State v. Martin, 93-0285, p. 17 (La.10/17/94), ; ).
State v. Hollins 123 So. 3d 840 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
See State v. Martin, 93-0285 (La.10/17/94), .
State v. Lawrence 120 So. 3d 812 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
See State v. Martin, 93-0285, p. 18 (La.10/17/94)
State v. Brown 115 So. 3d 564 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
4 Cir. 2/4/98) , -79 (on reh’g); see also State v. Martin, 93-0285, pp. 10-11 (La.10/17/94), (“The decision to grant or deny a motion for 117continuance lies within the wide discretion of the trial court.”).
State v. Howard 106 So. 3d 1038 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
P. art. 712; State v. Martin, 93-0285 (La.10/17/94), .
State of Louisiana v. Matthew Thomas Conway La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
See also State v. Koon, 96-1208, (La.5/20/97); State v. Maxie, 93-2158, (La.4/10/95); State v. Martin, 93-0285, (La.10/17/94)
State v. Conway 101 So. 3d 1132 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
See also State v. Koon, 96-1208, (La.5/20/97); ; State v. Maxie, 93-2158, (La.4/10/95); ; State v. Martin, 93-0285, (La.10/17/94); .