Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Tart, 672 So. 2d 116.

150 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Don Lee Johnson La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2025
State of Louisiana v. Dewayne Willie Watkins La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2024
State of Louisiana v. Marvin Santiago La. 2024
State of Louisiana v. Julieanne Perales A/K/A Julianne Perales La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
State of Louisiana v. Michael Edwin Vice La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
State Of Louisiana v. David Brown La. 2022
State Of Louisiana v. David H. Brown (Parish of Lafourche) Convictions Affirmed; Death Sentences Reversed; Case Remanded For … La. 2021
State of Louisiana v. Isame Henry Faciane A/K/A Isame Faciance La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2020
State of Louisiana v. Joshua Darelle Lewis La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2020
State v. Latique 265 So. 3d 93 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
2/9/96), , cert denied, 519 U.S. 1035 , 117 S.Ct.
State of Louisiana v. Elijah James Latique La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
2/9/96), cert denied, 519 U.S., 1035, 117 S.Ct.
State of Louisiana v. Lee Turner, Jr. 263 So. 3d 337 La. 2018
2/9/96), State v. Copeland, 530 So.
State v. Dressner 255 So. 3d 537 La. 2018
2/9/96), , 164 ; State v. Copeland , , 544-45 (La.
State v. Reeves 254 So. 3d 665 La. 2018
State of Louisiana v. Terry James Goodeaux -Aka- Terry Goodeaux La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
cting loyalties may arise in several different contexts, but may include the circumstance “where an attorney runs into a conflict because he or she is required to cross-examine a witness who is testifying against the defendant and who was or is a client of the attorney.” Cisco, 2001-2732 p. 17, 861 So.2d at 129, citing State v. Tart, 1993-0772 p. 19 (La.2/9/96), cert.
State v. Walker 221 So. 3d 951 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
2/9/96), ; State v. Carter, 2010-0614 (La.
State v. Luzzo 214 So. 3d 55 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
State of Louisiana v. Albert Scott -Aka- Albert Jonathan Scott La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
onflicting loyalties may arise in several different contexts, but may include the circumstance “where an attorney runs into a conflict because he or she is required to cross-examine a witness who is testifying against the defendant and who was or is a client of the attorney.” Cisco, 2001-2732 p. 17, 861 So.2d at 129, citing State v. Tart, 1993-0772 p. 19 (La.2/9/96), cert.
State v. Scott 209 So. 3d 888 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
The issue of conflicting loyalties may arise in several different contexts, but may include the circumstance “where an attorney runs into a conflict because he or she is required to cross-examine a witness who is testifying against the defendant and who was or is a client of the attorney.” Cisco , 2001-2732 p. 17, 861 So.2d at 129 , citing State v. Tart, 1993-0772 p. 19 (La.2/9/96), , cert.
State of Louisiana v. Jeffrey Clark 220 So. 3d 583 La. 2016
2/9/96), -44 (appendix), cert.
State v. Chester 208 So. 3d 338 La. 2016
State v. Walker 206 So. 3d 474 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
State of Louisiana v. Robert Leroy McCoy 218 So. 3d 535 La. 2016
State v. Whitlock 207 So. 3d 538 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
State of Louisiana v. Marcus Donte Reed 200 So. 3d 291 La. 2016
2/9/96), (defendant killed an elderly couple with a hunting knife during the commission of an aggravated burglary and armed robbery or simple robbery of the couple’s jewelry store); State v. Taylor, 93-2201 (La.
State v. Lundy 195 So. 3d 587 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
confession.”); (finding that defendant’s claim of mental deficiency did not prevent admission of his confession as diminished mental or intellectual capacity alone does not impair the ability to knowingly and intelligently waive constitutional rights); and State v. Tart, 93-0772, at p. 23 (La.2/9/96), 126 (finding a defendant’s inculpatory statement admissible despite defendant’s argument that he was functionally illiterate and .emotionally disturbed, and thus incapable of knowingly and voluntar
State v. Blank 192 So. 3d 93 La. 2016
See, e.g., State v. Strickland, 94-0025, pp. 51-52 (La.11/1/96), ; State v. Taylor, 93-2201, (La.2/28/96), (unpub’d appx.); State v. Tart, 93-0772, p. 55 (La.2/9/96), ; *103 544-45 (La.1988) ().
State of Louisiana v. Robert Glen Coleman 188 So. 3d 174 La. 2016
2/9/96), State v. Copeland, 530 So.
State v. King 186 So. 3d 264 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
attorney.” State v. Tart, 93-0772, p. 20 (La.2/9/96)
State v. Jordan 174 So. 3d 1259 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
State v. Tart, 93-0772 (La.2/09/96), , cert.
State v. Ellis 161 So. 3d 64 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
In State v. Tart, 93-0772 (La.2/9/96), , a jury in the sentencing phase of a first degree murder capital case returned a “sentencing verdict,” listing “simple burglary” as the fourth and final aggravating circumstance offense it found present from the list of possible aggravating circumstance offenses in La.C.Cr.P.
State v. Taylor 161 So. 3d 963 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
State v. Tart, 1993-0772 (La.02/09/96), , cert.
State v. Shabazz 167 So. 3d 725 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State v. Tart, 93-0772 (La.2/9/96), , cert.
State v. Kelly 164 So. 3d 866 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
The issue of conflicting loyalties “usually arises in the context of joint representation” but “can also arise where an attorney runs into a conflict because he or she is required to cross-examine a witness who is testifying against the defendant and who was or is a client of the attorney.” State v. Tart, 93-0772 (La.2/9/96), , cert.
State v. Hankton 140 So. 3d 398 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
1246, 1265 , 113 L.Ed.2d 302 (1991); State v. Tart, 93-0772 (La.2/9/96), , cert.
State v. Williams 137 So. 3d 832 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State v. Tart, 93-0772, pp. 55 (La.2/9/96), .
State v. Jones 122 So. 3d 1065 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
4 Cir. 12/22/11), , writ denied, 12-0231 (La.5/18/12), ; see also State v. Strickland, 94-0025, pp. 51-52 (La.11/1/96), (the cumulative effect of harmless errors does not warrant reversal of a conviction or sentence); accord State v. Tart, 93-0772, p. 55 (La.2/9/96), .
State of Louisiana v. Bryant Lakeith Bethley La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
State of Louisiana v. Bryant Lakeith Bethley La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
State v. Bethley 107 So. 3d 834 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Tart, 93-772 (La.2/9/96), , cert.
State v. Bethley 107 So. 3d 841 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Tart, 93-772 (La.2/9/96), , cert.
State v. Grady 108 So. 3d 845 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
See also State v. Tart, 93-0772 (La.02/09/96), , cert.
State v. George 108 So. 3d 269 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
See, e.g. State v. Tart, 93-0772, p. 19 (La.2/9/96), (a conflict of interest can arise when an attorney is required to cross-examine a witness who is testifying against the defendant and who was or is a client of the attorney).
State v. Williams 93 So. 3d 830 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
1246, 1265 , 113 L.Ed.2d 302 (1991); State v. Tart, 93-0772 (La.2/9/96), , cert.
State v. Carter 84 So. 3d 499 La. 2012
For example, an attorney may run into a conflict when “he or she is required to cross-examine a witness who is testifying against the defendant and who was or is a client of the attorney.” State v. Cisco, 01-2732, p. 17, 861 So.2d at 129 -30 (quoting State v. Tart, 93-0772, p. 19 (La.2/9/96), , ).
State v. Marlowe 81 So. 3d 944 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Strickland, 94-0025, pp. 51-52 (La.11/1/96), ; State v. Tart, 93-0772, p. 55 (La.2/9/96), .
State v. Odenbaugh 82 So. 3d 215 La. 2011
(ex-employee returns to restaurant, shoots three and kills two); State v. Robertson, 97-0177 (La.3/4/98), (mixed-race couple stabbed to death in their home during an aggravated burglary); State v. Baldwin, 96-1660 (La.12/12/97), (defendant shot and killed his estranged wife and the three men who were with her at the time); State v. Tart, 93-0772 (La.2/9/96), (defendant murdered his estranged girlfriend and severely wounded her mother); State v. Taylor, 93-2201 (La.2/28/96), (ex-employee returns
State v. Dorsey 74 So. 3d 603 La. 2011
at 604 (citing State v. Tart, 93-0772, p. 18 (La.2/9/96); , cert.
Floyd v. Cain 62 So. 3d 57 La. 2011
State v. Montejo 40 So. 3d 952 La. 2010
1246 , 113 L.Ed.2d 302 (1991); State v. Koon, 96-1208 (La.5/20/97), -64 ; State v. Tart, 93-0772 (La.2/9/96), -29 .