Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Lee, 637 So. 2d 102.

69 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Delands Brown La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
Ex Rel Joseph Barnes Versus Tim Hooper Warden La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2022
Johnson v. Day, 92-0122 (La.5/13/94)
State of Louisiana v. Domenique Nelson Bryant La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
State Of Louisiana v. Michael Halford La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2021
State of Louisiana v. Cody Nicholas Davis La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
State of Louisiana v. Dave A. Turner La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2020
State v. Lee, 93-2810, p. 5 (La.5/23/94)
State of Louisiana v. Colby James Kinsey A/K/A Colby J. Kinsey La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2020
State of Louisiana v. Antonio Merquis Harris La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
State v. Harris 274 So. 3d 178 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
State of Louisiana v. Miles J. Guidry La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
State v. Guidry 271 So. 3d 275 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
State of Louisiana v. Michael Lee Walls La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
State v. Lee, 93-2810, p. 9 (La.5/23/94)
State v. Walls 270 So. 3d 701 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
State v. Lee , 93-2810, p.9 (La.5/23/94), , 108.
State of Louisiana v. Prince Record La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
State v. Record 266 So. 3d 592 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
State v. Folse 258 So. 3d 53 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
State v. Lee , , 108 (La.
State v. Folse 258 So. 3d 188 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Therefore, the trial court's rulings will not be disturbed unless a review of the voir dire as a whole indicates an abuse of that discretion, State v. Lee , , 108 (La.
State of Louisiana v. Aaron Orlando Richards -Aka- Aaron Richards La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
State v. Lee, 93-2810, p. 9 (La.5/23/94)
State v. Richards 247 So. 3d 878 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
State v. Hutsell 241 So. 3d 542 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2018
State v. Harrison 239 So. 3d 406 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
State of Louisiana v. Derrick A. Dotson La. 2017
State of Louisiana v. Jeffrey Clark 220 So. 3d 583 La. 2016
5/23/94), (also providing that the trial judge is afforded great discretion in determining whether cause has been shown to justify removal of a prospective juror); (La.
State v. Burse 169 So. 3d 649 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
State v. Lee, 93-2810 (La.05/23/94), .
State v. Nelson 169 So. 3d 493 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
State v. Lee, 93-2810 (La.5/23/94)
State v. McClure 169 So. 3d 510 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
State v.. Lee, 93-2810 (La.5/23/94)
State v. Magee 150 So. 3d 446 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State v. Lee, 93-2810, p. 9 (La.5/23/94)
State v. Mills 153 So. 3d 481 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State v. Nellum 136 So. 3d 120 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
ould vote guilty, she replied: “That would weigh heavy on me, that he wouldn’t have any possibility of parole, that he does have to spend life in jail.” The Louisiana Supreme Court discussed the applicable standard of review a trial court’s ruling on a challenge for cause in State v. Kang, 02-2812, pp. 6-7 (La.10/21/03), -54 , stating: *131 In State v. Lee, 93-2810 (La.5/23/94), , this court reiterated the broad discretion afforded trial courts’ rulings on motions to strike jurors for cause beca
State v. Taylor 118 So. 3d 65 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Lee, 93-2810, p. 9 (La.5/23/94), .
State v. Brown 115 So. 3d 564 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
An appellate court is bound to give deference to a trial court’s ruling on jury challenges because it “ ‘has the benefit of seeing the facial expressions and hearing the vocal intonations of the members of the jury venire as they respond to questioning.’ ” Anthony , 98-406 at p. 25, 776 So.2d at 392 (quoting State v. Lee, 93-2810, p. 9 (La.5/23/94), ).
State v. Munson 115 So. 3d 6 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Lee, 93-2810, p. 9 (La.5/23/94), .
State v. Lilly 111 So. 3d 45 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
See State v. Lee, 98-2810 (La.5/23/94), .
State v. Kirk 98 So. 3d 934 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State v. Lee, 93-2810, p. 9 (La.5/23/94), ,108
State v. Woods 91 So. 3d 1129 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
State v. Odenbaugh 82 So. 3d 215 La. 2011
This Court noted in State v. Lee, 93-2810, p. 9 (La.5/23/94), , that a trial judge is accorded broad discretion in ruling on cause challenges because he or she “has the benefit of seeing the facial expressions and hearing the vocal intonations of the members of the jury venire as they respond to questioning by the parties’ attorneys.” See also State v. Cross, 93-1189, pp. 6
State v. Dorsey 74 So. 3d 603 La. 2011
State v. Lee, 93-2810, p. 9 (La.5/23/94); ; See State v. Blank, 04-0204, p. 25 (La.4/11/07); (citing State v. Cross, 93-1189, pp. 6-7 (La.6/30/95); -87 ).
State v. Andrews 61 So. 3d 121 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Lee, 93-2810, p. 9 (La.5/23/94)
State v. Burton 43 So. 3d 1073 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
State v. Lee, 93-2810, p. 9 (La.5/23/94)
State v. Robinson 11 So. 3d 613 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
L 12State v. Lee, 93-2810, p. 9 (La.5/23/94)
State v. Anderson 996 So. 2d 973 La. 2008
State v. Lee, 93-2810, p. 9 (La.5/23/94), , 108 *998 (trial judge is afforded great discretion in determining whether cause has been shown to reject a prospective juror); (La.
State of Louisiana v. Paul Roberts, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
State v. Roberts 947 So. 2d 208 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
at 654 (citing State v. Lee, 93-2810 (La.5/23/94), , ).
State v. Scott 921 So. 2d 904 La. 2006
State v. Lee, 93-2810, p. 9 (La.5/23/94), (trial judge is afforded great discretion in determining whether cause has been shown to reject a prospective juror); (La.
State v. Stein 874 So. 2d 279 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
[20] State v. Anthony , 98-0406 at p. 25, 776 So.2d at 392 (quoting State v. Lee, 93-2810, p. 9 (La.5/23/94)), ; State v. Bush, supra ).
State v. Eugene 871 So. 2d 584 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
at 392 (quoting, in part, State v. Lee, 93-2810, p. 9 (La.5/23/94), ).
State v. Kang 859 So. 2d 649 La. 2003
In State v. Lee, 93-2810 (La.5/23/94), , this court reiterated the broad discretion afforded trial courts' rulings on *654 motions to strike jurors for cause because of their ability to get a first person impression of prospective jurors during voir dire.
State v. Carmouche 872 So. 2d 1020 La. 2003
State v. Lee, 93-2810, p. 9 (La.5/23/94), .
State v. Tate 851 So. 2d 921 La. 2003
State v. Lee, 93-2810, p. 9 (La.5/23/94)
State v. Williams 831 So. 2d 835 La. 2002
See State v. Lee, 93-2810, p. 9 (La.5/23/94), .

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by