DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite In Interest of CLS, 649 So. 2d 532.

17 citing documents.

  • S.B. in the Interest of A. J. N. and S. R. N. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
    3 Cir. 11/2/94), -39, this court addressed a parent’s requested revocation of a voluntary transfer of custody pursuant to La.Ch.Code.
  • Explained In re State Z.S.J. 275 So. 3d 306 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
    3 Cir. 11/2/94), , 536 (internal citations omitted), we explained: Proof by clear and convincing evidence requires a party to persuade the trier of fact that the fact or causation sought to be proved is highly probable, i.e. much more probable than its non-existence.
  • Explained State in the Interest of Z. S. J. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
    3 Cir. 11/2/94), (internal citations omitted), we explained: Proof by clear and convincing evidence requires a party to persuade the trier of fact that the fact or causation sought to be proved is highly probable, i.e. much more probable than its non-existence.
  • Explained State in the Interest of K. D. M.,k. J. M. & K. K. B. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
    3 Cir. 11/2/94), (internal citations omitted), we explained: Proof by clear and convincing evidence requires a party to persuade the trier of fact that the fact or causation sought to be proved is highly probable, i.e. much more probable than its non-existence.
  • Explained In re State in Interest of K.D.M. 271 So. 3d 1279 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
    3 Cir. 11/2/94), , 536 (internal citations omitted), we explained: Proof by clear and convincing evidence requires a party to persuade the trier of fact that the fact or causation sought to be proved is highly probable, i.e. much more probable than its non-existence.
  • Explained State of Louisiana in the Interest of H. B. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
    3 Cir. 11/2/94), (internal citations omitted), we explained: Proof by clear and convincing evidence requires a party to persuade the trier of fact that the fact or causation sought to be proved is highly probable, i.e. much more probable than its non-existence.
  • Explained State in the Interest of R.J. and M.J. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
    3 Cir. 11/2/94), (internal citations omitted), we explained: 2 Louisiana Children’s Code Article 1015 was amended, effective August 1, 2016, to add conviction of a sex offense as a ground for termination as paragraph 1015(3), thereby changing the number of former Article 1015(5) to 1015(6).
  • Explained State in the Interest of J.M.B. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
    3 Cir. 11/2/94), (internal citations omitted), we explained: Proof by clear and convincing evidence requires a party to persuade the trier of fact that the fact or causation sought to be proved is highly probable, i.e. much more probable than its non-existence.
  • Christopher Cloud v. Emily Dean La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
  • Cloud v. Dean 184 So. 3d 235 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
  • State ex rel. SNW v. Mitchell 788 So. 2d 1271 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    3 Cir. 11/2/94) ; ; (La.App.
  • State ex rel. S.M.W. 771 So. 2d 160 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
  • State ex rel. B.J. 767 So. 2d 869 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
  • State ex rel. R.C. 769 So. 2d 622 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
  • State, in Interest of Sm 719 So. 2d 445 La. 1998
  • Clark v. Kleidon 682 So. 2d 887 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
  • In Interest of Jln 658 So. 2d 272 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
    3d Cir. 11/2/94), and State in Interest of P.R.B., (La.App.