Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Van Winkle, 658 So. 2d 198.

94 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Steve Derozal Williams La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2026
State of Louisiana v. Jimmie Dixon, Jr. La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2025
State of Louisiana Versus Marshae Jones La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2024
6/30/95), State v. Young, 20-01041 (La.
State Of Louisiana v. Margaret Camaille Stockstill La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2024
State of Louisiana v. Sterling Terrel Brown La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
State of Louisiana v. Darrell Clark La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2024
State of Louisiana v. Willie Derrick Jackson La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2023
State Of Louisiana v. Kevin Abimael Guzman La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2022
State of Louisiana v. Jerald Dewayne Smith La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2022
State Of Louisiana v. Joseph Andrew St. Romain, Jr. La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2021
State Of Louisiana v. Jerrell Alexander La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2021
State Of Louisiana v. Michael Young La. 2021
State Of Louisiana v. Kirby Thomas La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
State v. Ford 275 So. 3d 404 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
06/30/95), , 202 ; State v. Nixon , 17-1582 (La.
State of Louisiana Versus Derrick A. Ford, Jr. La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2019
06/30/95), State v. Nixon, 17-1582 (La.
State v. Barnett 267 So. 3d 209 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
State v. Williams 265 So. 3d 902 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
6/30/95), , 201-202, the Louisiana Supreme Court discussed a defendant's right to present a defense: A criminal defendant has the constitutional right to present a defense.
State v. Nixon 250 So. 3d 273 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
6/30/95), , 202 ; State v. Gremillion , , 1078 (La.
State v. Williams 240 So. 3d 355 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
State v. Magee 243 So. 3d 151 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
State of Louisiana v. Corlious C. Dyson AKA Corlious Corall Dyson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
6/30/95), Defendant points out that the supreme court “stated that evidentiary rules may not supersede the fundamental right to present a defense.
State v. Dyson 220 So. 3d 785 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
6/30/95), , Defendant points out that the supreme court “stated that evidentiary rules may not supersede the fundamental right to present a defense.
State v. Calderon 220 So. 3d 830 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
State of Louisiana v. Jeffrey Clark 220 So. 3d 583 La. 2016
6/30/95), -02 (holding that the exclusion of hearsay evidence suggesting that the defendant’s roommate killed the victim was reversible error); (La.
State v. Scott 197 So. 3d 298 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
State v. Van Winkle, 94-0947, p. 5 (La.6/30/95), -202 .
State v. Griffin 176 So. 3d 561 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
State v. Juniors, 03-2425, pp. 44-45 (La.6/29/05), -26 (citing State v. Van Winkle, 94-0947 (La.6/30/95), )
State v. Roe 151 So. 3d 838 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State v. Van Winkle, 94-0947, p. 5 (La.6/30/95), -202 .
State v. Williams 137 So. 3d 832 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
4 Cir. 9/27/00), (citing State v. Van Winkle, 94-0947 (La.6/30/95), ).
State v. Cope 137 So. 3d 151 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
1920 , 18 L.Ed.2d 1019 (1967); State v. Van Winkle, 94-0947 (La.6/30/95), .
State v. Ross 137 So. 3d 759 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
4 Cir. 12/30/08), (quoting State v. Van Winkle, 94-0947, pp. 5-6 (La.6/30/95), -02 ).
State v. Smoot 134 So. 3d 1 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State v. Van Winkle, 94-0947 (La.6/30/95), .
State v. Scott 131 So. 3d 501 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Van Winkle, 94-0947, p. 5 (La.6/30/95), -202 .
State v. Marcelin 116 So. 3d 928 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
(Citation omitted) (quoting State v. Van Winkle, 94-0947, p. 5 (La.6/30/95), -02 ).
State v. Jackson 115 So. 3d 1155 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Van Winkle, 94-0947, p. 5 (La.6/30/95), .
State v. Thomas 106 So. 3d 665 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
The Louisiana Supreme Court said, in State v. Van Winkle, 94-0947, p. 5 (La.6/30/95), , 201-202: A criminal defendant has the constitutional right to present a defense.
State v. Hugle 104 So. 3d 598 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
4 Cir. 10/25/06), , quoting State v. Van Winkle, 94-0947, p. 5 (La.6/30/95), .
State of Louisiana v. Byran Louis Fogleman La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
State v. Fogleman 98 So. 3d 964 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Const, art. 1, § 16; State v. Van Winkle, 94-0947 (La.6/30/95), .
State v. Everett 96 So. 3d 605 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State v. Juniors, 03-2425, pp. 44-45 (La.6/29/05), -26 , citing State v. Van Winkle, 94-0947 (La.6/30/95)
State v. Brown 86 So. 3d 726 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
1920 , 18 L.Ed.2d 1019 (1967); State v. Van Winkle, 1994-0947 (La.06/30/95), ; State v. Johnson, 41,428 (La.App.2d13 Cir.09/27/06), .
State v. Franklin 87 So. 3d 860 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
5 Cir. 4/26/05) , -89 (citing State v. Van Winkle, 94-0947 (La.6/30/95), ; ).
State v. Rubens 83 So. 3d 30 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Van Winkle, 94-0947, p. 5 (La.6/30/95), -202 .
State v. Jacobs 67 So. 3d 535 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
2142, 2146 , 90 L.Ed.2d 636 (1986); State v. Van Winkle, 94-0947, p. 5 (La.6/30/95), .
State of Louisiana v. Jonathan Edward Boyer La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
This court set forth the following discussion of the applicable case law: the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: A criminal defendant has the constitutional right to present a defense.
State v. Boyer 56 So. 3d 1119 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
This court set forth the following discussion of the applicable case law: the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: A criminal defendant has the constitutional right to present a defense.
State v. Fernandez 50 So. 3d 219 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
State v. Van Winkle, 94-0947 (La.6/30/95), ; see also Chambers v. Mississippi, 410 U.S. 284 , 93 S.Ct.
State v. Dressner 45 So. 3d 127 La. 2010
5 Cir. 3/16/94), (“The predicate [for assessing the evidentiary weight of a statement] should not provide another opportunity to attack the admissibility of the statement.”), rev’d 94-0947, p. 8 (La.6/30/95), (“Ms. Van Winkle argues the District Court erred in prohibiting her from presenting evidence as to her mental state when she gave the various statements....
State v. McMillan 43 So. 3d 297 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
1920 , 18 L.Ed.2d 1019 (1967); State v. Van Winkle, 94-0947, p. 5 (La.6/30/95), .
State v. TRUVIA 29 So. 3d 669 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
1920 , 18 L.Ed.2d 1019 (1967); State v. Van Winkle, 94-0947, p. 5 (La.6/30/95), .
State v. Johnson 28 So. 3d 1167 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
In State v. Van Winkle, 94-0947, pp. 5-6 (La.6/30/95), -202 , the Court discussed a defendant’s right to present a defense: A criminal defendant has the constitutional right to present a defense.

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by