Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Green, 655 So. 2d 272.

274 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Jermeil Young La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2026
State Of Louisiana v. Cordale Richard La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2025
State Of Louisiana v. Ray Allen Parker La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2024
5/ 22/ 95), see also State v. Tucker, 2013- 1631 ( La.
State of Louisiana Versus Justin A. Hutchinson La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2023
State Of Louisiana v. Dkerian Thompson La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2023
State Of Louisiana v. Rudy Emanuel Melerine La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2022
State of Louisiana v. Trevor Marcel Williams La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2022
State of Louisiana v. Orlando Brown La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2022
State of Louisiana Versus Willie Youngblood La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2022
State of Louisiana v. Lonnie B. Kirklin, Jr. A/K/A Lonnie Bernard Kirklin, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
State v. Green, 94-0887, p. 11 (La.5/22/95), State v. Brooks, 92-3331, p. 10, (La.1/17/95)
State Of Louisiana v. Jordan Cyprian La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2021
State of Louisiana v. Tristan Romero La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
“The inference is ‘necessary’ because if such an inference cannot be drawn from the evidence presented by the defendant, he is unable to make a prima facie case of purposeful discrimination and his Batson challenge expires at the threshold.” Duncan, 802 So.2d at 544 (quoting State v. Green, 94-0887, p. 28 (La.5/22/95), n. 24).
State Of Louisiana v. Albert Franklin La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2021
State Of Louisiana v. Donovan Darville La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2021
State Of Louisiana v. Michael Boeh La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2021
State of Louisiana v. Michael Thibodeaux La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
For example, in State v. Green, this Court held “the defendant may offer any facts relevant to the question of the prosecutor’s discriminatory intent to satisfy this burden.” 94-0887, p. 24 (La.5/22/95)
State Of Louisiana in the Interest of T.B., Jr. La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2021
State Of Louisiana in the Interest of M.J. La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2021
State of Louisiana Versus Teddy Chester La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2021
State Of Louisiana v. Curtis L. Hall La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2020
State Of Louisiana v. William Thomas Jones, Jr. La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2020
State Of Louisiana v. Christopher James Landry La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2020
State Of Louisiana v. Ronald St. Cyre La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
State Of Louisiana v. Justin Zeringue La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
5/ 22/ 95), State v. Peterson, 2003- 1806 La.
State of Louisiana v. Kenneth Jones La. 2019
State v. Youngblood 274 So. 3d 716 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
State of Louisiana Versus Ron C. Youngblood La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2019
State v. Conklin 274 So. 3d 675 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
5/22/95), , 280-81 ; State v. Magee, 2017-1217 (La.
State of Louisiana v. Lee Turner, Jr. 263 So. 3d 337 La. 2018
5/22/95), (“A trial judge’s demand that a prosecutor justify his use of peremptory strikes is tantamount to a finding that the defense has produced enough evidence to support an inference of discriminatory purpose.”).
State v. Hampton 261 So. 3d 993 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2018
State v. Jefferson 261 So. 3d 793 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
State v. Alridge 249 So. 3d 260 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
5/22/95), , 290, n. 24 ), (where the court explained if an inference cannot be drawn from the evidence presented by the defendant, " 'he is unable to make a prima facie case of purposeful discrimination and his Batson challenge expires at the threshold.'
State v. Magee 243 So. 3d 151 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
State of Louisiana v. Larry Broussard, Jr. AKA Larry James Broussard, Jr. AKA Larry J. Broussard, Jr. La. 2018
State v. Simon 245 So. 3d 1149 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2018
State of Louisiana v. Samuel Anderson -Aka- Samuel Brent Anderson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
5/22/95), explained: Regarding this first step of the Batson analysis, the trial court below did not expressly rule on whether the defendant had made out a prima facie case of purposeful discrimination; rather, he immediately moved to the second step and ordered the prosecutor to justify h
State v. Anderson 258 So. 3d 44 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
5/22/95), , 288, explained: Regarding this first step of the Batson analysis, the trial court below did not expressly rule on whether the defendant had made out a prima facie case of purposeful discrimination; rather, he immediately moved to the second step and ordered the prosecutor to justify his use of peremptory strikes aga
State v. Berry 221 So. 3d 967 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
5/22/95), , the Court outlined the following multifactor approach for determining whether a prima facie case has been made: The defendant may offer any facts relevant to the question of the prosecutor’s discriminatory intent to satisfy this burden.
State of Louisiana v. Joshua X. Griffin La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
State v. Griffin 217 So. 3d 484 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
State of Louisiana v. Kennon Richard AKA Kennan Richard La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
State of Louisiana v. Christopher O. James La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
(Citing State v. Green, 94-0887 (La.5/22/95), ).
State v. Richard 216 So. 3d 1128 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
State v. James 216 So. 3d 117 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
State v. Jones 214 So. 3d 124 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
State ex rel. R.M. 209 So. 3d 217 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
State v. Chester 208 So. 3d 338 La. 2016
5/22/95), ; State v. Brooks, 92-3331, p, 12 (La.
State of Louisiana v. Rodricus C. Crawford 218 So. 3d 13 La. 2016
5/22/95), (quoting Hernandez v. New York, 500 U.S. 352, 358-59 (1991)); accord Batson, 476 U.S. at 93-95.
State v. Wilson 208 So. 3d 999 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
State in the Interest of J.J.M. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
See State v. Green, 94- 0887 (La.5/22/95), 1 [sic].