DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Green, 655 So. 2d 272.

274 citing documents.

  • State v. Blank 955 So. 2d 90 La. 2007
    5/22/95), ; State v. Brooks, 92-3331, p. 10 (La.
  • State v. Coleman 949 So. 2d 570 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
    State v. Green, 94-0887 (La.5/22/95), .
  • State v. Snyder 942 So. 2d 484 La. 2006
    State v. Green, 94-0887, p. 25 (La.5/22/95), .
  • State v. Leger 936 So. 2d 108 La. 2006
    State v. Sherman, XXXX-XXXX (La.10/29/04), ; State v. Green, XXXX-XXXX p. 11 (La.5/22/95), .
  • State v. Lawrence 925 So. 2d 727 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
    See State v. Green, XXXX-XXXX (La.5/22/95), .
  • State v. Qualls 921 So. 2d 226 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
    1859 , 114 L.Ed.2d 395 (1991); Batson v. Kentucky, supra ; State v. Green, 94-0887 (La.5/22/95), .
  • State v. Price 917 So. 2d 1201 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
    In State v. Green, 94-0887 (La.5/22/95), , the Louisiana Supreme Court held that the sole focus of the Batson inquiry is upon the intent of the prosecutor at the time he exercised his peremptory strikes.
  • State v. Heard 917 So. 2d 658 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
    State v. Green, 94-0887 (La.05/22/95), .
  • State v. Juniors 915 So. 2d 291 La. 2005
    See also, State v. Green, 94-0887, p. 25 (La.5/22/95), .
  • State v. Allen 913 So. 2d 788 La. 2005
    State v. Green, 94-0887, p. 24 (La.5/22/95), -88 .
  • State v. Parker 901 So. 2d 513 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
    State v. Green, 94-0887 (La.5/22/95), .
  • State v. Elie 899 So. 2d 689 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
    State v. Green, 94-0887, pp. 23-24 (La.5/22/95), .
  • State of Louisiana v. Danny Ray Sherman La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
    State v. Green, 94-0887, p. 11 (La.5/22/95), State v. Brooks, 92-3331, p. 10, (La.1/17/95), ” The Court has had an opportunity to review the testimony associated with the motion to suppress and the testimony of the trial in this matter since the remand to this court.
  • State v. Sherman 896 So. 2d 1194 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
    State v. Green, 94-0887, p. 11 (La.5/22/95), ; State v. Brooks, 92-3331, p. 10, (La.1/17/95), ; "
  • State v. Young 895 So. 2d 753 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
    State v. Green, 94-0887, p. 11 (La.5/22/95), ; State v. Brooks, 92-3331, p. 10, (La.1/17/95)
  • State v. Price 909 So. 2d 612 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
    [6] State v. Green, 94-0887 (La.5/22/95), (citations omitted).
  • State v. James 897 So. 2d 821 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2005
    See State v. Green, 94-0887 (La.5/22/95), ; State v. Brown, 98-2214 (La.App.
  • State v. Robinson 896 So. 2d 1115 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
    In State v. Green, 94-0887 (La.5/22/95), , the Louisiana Supreme Court discussed how a defendant may establish his prima facie case: The defendant may offer any facts relevant to the question of the prosecutor's discriminatory intent to satisfy this burden.
  • State v. Butler 894 So. 2d 415 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2005
    State v. Green, 94-0887, pp. 9-10 (La.5/22/95), ; State v. Labostrie, 96-2003, p. 5 (La.App.
  • State v. Jones 891 So. 2d 760 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2004
    State v. Green, 94-0887, pp. 9-10 (La.5/22/95), ; State v. Labostrie, 96-2003, p. 5 (La.App.
  • State v. Sherman 886 So. 2d 1116 La. 2004
    State v. Green, 94-0887, p. 11 (La.5/22/95), ; State v. Brooks, 92-3331, p. 10, (La.1/17/95)
  • State v. Manning 885 So. 2d 1044 La. 2004
    See State v. Green, 94-0886 (La.5/22/95), -84 (mildly retarded defendant's waiver of rights was knowing and intelligent, even though psychologist testified defendant was unable to comprehend his rights; psychologist also testified defendant was educable and could be made to understand rights, police officers testified defendant understood as well as defen
  • State v. Kirsch 880 So. 2d 890 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
    State v. Green, 94-0887 (La.5/22/95), .
  • State v. Bailey 875 So. 2d 949 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
    State v. Green, 94-0887, p. 25 (La.5/22/95), .
  • State v. Spivey 874 So. 2d 352 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
    at 1722-1724 ; State v. Green, 94-0887 (La.5/22/95), ; State v. Banks, 96-652 (La.App.
  • State v. Robinson 874 So. 2d 66 La. 2004
    In State v. Green, 94-0887 (La.5/22/95), , this Court held that the sole focus of the Batson inquiry is upon the intent of the prosecutor at the time he exercised his peremptory strikes and outlined several factors which could lead to the inference of discriminatory intent prohibited by Batson , which include, but are not limited to: "a pattern of strikes by
  • State v. Alexander 871 So. 2d 483 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
    State v. Green, 94-0887 p. 25 (La.5/22/95), .
  • State v. Poole 864 So. 2d 900 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
    Batson, supra; State v. Green, 94-0887 (La.05/22/95), ; State v. Thornton, 36,757 (La.App.2d Cir.01/29/03), , writ denied, 2003-0861 (La.10/31/03), .
  • State of Louisiana v. Brian Keith Poullard La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
    5/22/95), -81, writ denied, 00-3351 (La.
  • State v. Poullard 863 So. 2d 702 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
    State v. Green, 94-0887, pp. 10-11 (La.5/22/95), -81 , writ denied, 00-3351 (La.8/24/01), .
  • State v. Perrilloux 864 So. 2d 843 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
    State v. Green, 94-887 (La.5/22/95), .
  • State v. Williams 863 So. 2d 652 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    4 Cir. 3/15/94), , rev’d on other grounds, 94-0887 (La.5/22/95), .
  • State v. Jackson 860 So. 2d 134 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
    at 1722-1724 ; State v. Green, 94-0887 (La.5/22/95), ; State v. Banks, 96-652 (La.App.
  • State v. Duplessy 853 So. 2d 77 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
    In State v. Green, 94-887 (La.5/22/95), , the Louisiana Supreme Court discussed how a defendant may establish his prima facie case: The defendant may offer any facts relevant to the question of the prosecutor's discriminatory intent to satisfy this burden.
  • State v. Raiford 846 So. 2d 913 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
    State v. Green, 94-0887 (La.5/22/95), .
  • State v. Thornton 836 So. 2d 1235 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
    Batson, supra; State v. Green, 94-0887 (La.05/22/95), .
  • State v. Dunn 831 So. 2d 862 La. 2002
    In State v. Green, 94-0887, p. 25 (La.5/22/95), , this court held that a trial judge's demand that the challenged party justify the use of a peremptory strike is tantamount to a finding that the challenger has produced enough evidence to support an inference of discriminatory purpose.
  • State v. Pugh 831 So. 2d 341 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
    State v. Green, 94-0887 (La.5/22/95), .
  • State v. Rodriguez 822 So. 2d 121 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    State v. Green, 94-0887, pp. 23-24 (La.5/22/95), .
  • State v. Bridgewater 823 So. 2d 877 La. 2002
    State v. Green, 94-0887 at p. 25 (La.5/22/95), .
  • State v. Temple 821 So. 2d 738 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    Adams, supra 99-2123, p. 4 , 779 So.2d at 117 , citing State v. Green, 94-0887 (La.5/22/95), .
  • State v. Odoms 815 So. 2d 224 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
    In State v. Green, 94-0887 (La.5/22/95), , writ denied (La.8/24/01), , the Louisiana Supreme Court stated the following: We agree with the court of appeal that a trial judge's demand that a prosecutor justify his use of peremptory strikes is tantamount to a finding that the defense has produced enough evidence to support an inference of di
  • State v. Royal 807 So. 2d 962 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
    [11] State v. Green, 94-0887 (La.5/22/95), -288 ; State v. Bourgeois, 00-13 (La.App.
  • State v. Diaz 800 So. 2d 1090 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    State v. Green, 94-0887 (La.5/22/95), .
  • State v. Joseph 802 So. 2d 735 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
    State v. Green, 94-0887 (La.5/22/95), .
  • State v. Duncan 802 So. 2d 533 La. 2001
    State v. Green , 94-0887 at p. 28 (La.5/22/95), , 290 n. 24.
  • State v. Baker 796 So. 2d 145 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
    Batson, supra; State v. Green, 94-0887 (La.05/22/95), .
  • State v. Lewis 795 So. 2d 468 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
    State v. Green, 94-0887 (La.5/22/95), .
  • State v. White 792 So. 2d 146 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
    In State v. Green, 94-0887 (La.5/22/95), , the Louisiana Supreme Court discussed the three-step test required to prove a Batson claim: First, the defendant must make a prima facie showing that the prosecutor has exercised peremptory challenges on the basis of race.
  • State v. Jacobs 803 So. 2d 933 La. 2001
    In State v. Green, 94-0887 (La.5/22/95), -88 , this court held that the sole focus of the Batson inquiry is upon the intent of the prosecutor at the time of exercising peremptory strikes and outlined several factors to be considered in determining whether the defense established discriminatory purpose: The defendant may offer any facts relevant to the qu