DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Boutte v. Winn-Dixie Louisiana, Inc., 674 So. 2d 299.

17 citing documents.

  • Mary Fisher and Robert Hamilton v. the Town of Boyce La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
    3 Cir. 4/17/96), (held improper ex parte communication between plaintiffs’ treating physicians and defense counsel); Coutee v. Global Marine Drilling Co., 04- 1293 (La.App.
  • Fisher v. Town of Boyce 250 So. 3d 904 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
    3 Cir. 4/17/96) , (held improper ex parte communication between plaintiffs' treating physicians and defense counsel); Coutee v. Global Marine Drilling Co. , 04-1293 (La.App.
  • Claudine Labarrera, Et Ux. v. Boyd Gaming Corporation La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
    3 Cir. 4/17/96), Coutee v. Global Marine Drilling Co., 04-1293 (La.App.
  • Labarrera v. Boyd Gaming Corp. 132 So. 3d 1018 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    3 Cir. 4/17/96) , , Coutee v. Global Marine Drilling Co., 04-1293 (La.App.
  • River Garden Apartments v. Robinson 108 So. 3d 352 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
  • Cece Sloan v. Renee Mouton La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
    3 Cir. 4/17/96), we determined that the physician’s testimony appeared to have startled the plaintiff’s counsel and cast a cloud over the plaintiff’s credibility as a witness.
  • Sloan v. Mouton 82 So. 3d 364 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    3 Cir. 4/17/96) , , we determined that the physician’s testimony appeared to have startled the plaintiffs counsel and cast a cloud over the plaintiffs credibility as a witness.
  • Tasha Tingle, Etc. v. American Home Assurance Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
    3 Cir. 4/17/1996), in which this court said: “Although a litigant is afforded some license in closing argument, here Winn-Dixie, by deliberately resorting to local prejudice and unsupported generalities, clearly crossed its bounds.” In our view, neither Duerden nor Winn-Dixie should be viewed as establishing a bright li
  • Tingle v. American Home Assurance Co. 40 So. 3d 1169 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    3 Cir. 4/17/1996), , in which this court said: “Although a litigant is afforded some license in closing argument, here Winn-Dixie, by deliberately resorting to local prejudice and unsupported generalities, clearly crossed its bounds.” In our view, neither Duerden nor Winn-Dixie should be viewed as establishing a bright line test fo
  • Colleen Wood v. American National Property & Casualty Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
  • Coutee v. Global Marine Drilling Co. 895 So. 2d 631 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
    3 Cir. 4/17/96) , , writ denied, 96-1936 (La.11/8/96), , determined that improper communication occurred between the defendant and the plaintiff's treating physician where privileged information was divulged.
  • Delton Coutee v. Global Marine Drilling Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
    3 Cir. 4/17/96), writ denied, 96-1936 (La.
  • Charles v. Acadia St. Landry Guest Home 787 So. 2d 1206 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    3 Cir. 4/17/96); ; Johnson v. Apeck Constr., Inc., 96-1283 (La.App.
  • Brister v. Continental Ins. Co. 712 So. 2d 177 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
    App. 3rd Cir. 4/17/96), .
  • Hortman v. Louisiana Steel Works 696 So. 2d 625 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
  • Johnson v. Apeck Const., Inc. 692 So. 2d 476 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
  • In re the Commitment of W.C. 685 So. 2d 634 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996