Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Theriot v. Midland Risk Ins. Co., 694 So. 2d 184.

209 citing documents.

State v. Broyard 183 So. 3d 796 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Theriot v. Midland Risk Insurance Co., 95-2895, p. 3 (La.5/20/97), .
State v. Tucker 170 So. 3d 394 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
State v. Brooks, 2009-2323 (La.10/19/10), ; Theriot v. Midland Risk Insurance Co., 95-2895 (La.5/20/97), .
State ex rel. K.C.C. 171 So. 3d 390 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Co., 95-2895 (La.5/20/97), (“[Wjhen the legislature specifically enumerates a series of things, the legislature’s omission of other items, which could have been easily included in the statute, is deemed intentional.”).
Danny Kelly v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Company 169 So. 3d 328 La. 2015
In re Edward Wisner Donation 150 So. 3d 391 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Co., 95-2895, p. 3 (La.5/20/97), .
State in the Interest of K. L. A. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
State ex rel. K.L.A. 140 So. 3d 889 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Co., 95-2895, p. 3 (La.5/20/97), ].
State ex rel. J.D. 129 So. 3d 831 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Co., 95-2895, p. 4 (La.5/20/97), ).
State v. Hill 125 So. 3d 1200 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
“[T]he paramount consideration in interpreting a statute is ascertaining the legislature’s intent and the reasons that prompted the legislature to enact the law.” Theriot v. Midland Risk Insurance Co., 95-2895, p. 3 (La.5/20/97), (citation omitted).
State of Louisiana v. Michael James Lacour La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
10/19/04)], 884 So.2d [568] at 575; Theriot v. Midland Risk Insurance Company, 95-2895 (La.5/20/97)
State v. Lacour 117 So. 3d 203 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
[State v.] Johnson, 03-2993 at 11 [(La.10/19/04)], 884 So.2d [568] at 575; Theriot v. Midland Risk Insurance Company, 95-2895 (La.5/20/97), ; (La.
State v. Maldonado 96 So. 3d 1221 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State v. Johnson, 2003-2993 (La.10/19/04), ; Theriot v. Midland Risk Insurance Co., 95-2895 (La.5/20/97), .
Richards v. St. Bernard Parish Government 91 So. 3d 524 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Co., 95-2895 (La.5/20/97), ; see also Louisiana Safety Ass’n of Timbermen Self-Insurers Fund v. Louisiana Ins.
State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co. v. Norcold, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
5/20/97), recognized that “[t]he 1989 amendments left some doubt as to whether third-party claimants could also seek penalties and attorney fees under La.
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Norcold, Inc. 88 So. 3d 1245 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Our supreme court, in Theriot v. Midland Risk Insurance Co., 95-2895, p. 8 (La.5/20/97), , recognized that “[t]he 1989 amendments left some doubt as to whether third-party claimants could also seek penalties and attorney fees under La.
Durio v. Horace Mann Insurance Co. 74 So. 3d 1159 La. 2011
Co., 95-2895 (La.5/20/97), .
State of Louisiana v. Ricky Joseph Langley La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
State v. Langley 61 So. 3d 747 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
Johnson, 03-2993 at 11, 884 So.2d at 575; Theriot v. Midland Risk Insurance Company, 95-2895 (La.5/20/97)
Smith v. BAMBINO 62 So. 3d 255 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
Co., 95-2895 (La.5/20/97), ; Soileau v. Allstate Ins.
State v. Williams 60 So. 3d 1189 La. 2011
Co., 95-2895, p. 3 (La.5/20/97), (on reh’g) (citations omitted), the Third Circuit focused too narrowly on immediate proximity of La.R.S.
Tabatha Nolan v. Audubon Ins. Group La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
5/20/97), Hart v. Allstate Ins.
Nolan v. Audubon Insurance Group 59 So. 3d 487 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
Co., 95-2895 (La.5/20/97), ; Hart v. Allstate Ins.
Sensebe v. Canal Indemnity Co. 58 So. 3d 441 La. 2011
Co., 1995-2895, p. 4 (La.5/20/97), .
Delisa Mitchell, Indiv. v. Albert Roy, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
Mitchell v. Roy 51 So. 3d 153 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Co., 95-2895, p. 3 (La.5/20/97), .
State v. Brooks 48 So. 3d 219 La. 2010
Theriot v. Midland Risk Insurance Co., 95-2895, p. 3 (La.5/20/97), .
Richard Duran Armstrong, Et Ux. v. Safeway Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
Co., 95-2895 (La.5/20/97), on rehearing, concluded that Subsection A of the above quoted statute does not create a broad duty to third-party claimants to make a reasonable effort to settle all claims.
Armstrong v. Safeway Insurance Co. 47 So. 3d 63 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Co., 95- *71 2895 (La.5/20/97), , on rehearing, concluded that Subsection A of the above quoted statute does not create a broad duty to third-party claimants to make a reasonable effort to settle all claims.
State v. Watts 41 So. 3d 625 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
10/19/04), ] 884 So.2d at 575 ; Theriot v. Midland Risk Insurance Company, 95-2895 (La.5/20/97), ; (La.
Buffman Inc. v. Lafayette Insurance Co. 36 So. 3d 1004 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2010
Theriot v. Midland Risk Insurance Company, 95-2895 (La.5/20/97), .
Bennett v. LAPEROUSE AND SON, LTD. 35 So. 3d 364 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Co., *367 95-2895 (La.5/20/1997) ; Hart v. Allstate Ins.
Mitchell v. Villien 19 So. 3d 557 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Co., 95-2895, pp. 3-4 (La.5/20/97), , 186-87 The starting point in the interpretation of any statute is the language of the statute itself....
Logan v. Brink's Inc. 16 So. 3d 530 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Co., 95-2895 (La.5/20/97), ].
Louisiana Safety Ass'n of Timbermen-Self Insurers Fund v. Louisiana Insurance Guaranty 17 So. 3d 350 La. 2009
Tensas Poppadoc, Inc. v. Chevron USA, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
Co., 95-2895 (La.5/20/97)
Tensas Poppadoc, Inc. v. Chevron USA, Inc. 10 So. 3d 1259 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
Co., 95-2895 (La.5/20/97), .
Hunter v. Morton's Seafood Restaurant & Catering 6 So. 3d 152 La. 2009
State v. Johnson, 2003-2993, p. 11 (La.10/29/04); ; Theriot v. Midland Risk Insurance *156 Co., 1995-2895, p. 3 (La.5/20/97); .
Starr v. Brou 8 So. 3d 674 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Co., 95-2895 (La.5/20/97), , the Louisiana Supreme Court addressed the interpretation of these two sentences.
Morvan v. Moore 2 So. 3d 1204 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
Theriot v. Midland Risk Insurance Company, 95-2895, (La.5/20/97), .
Prestenback v. Prestenback 9 So. 3d 172 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
1 Cir. 9/27/06), , unit denied, 2006-2685 (La.9/14/07), (citing Theriot v. Midland Risk Insurance Company, 95-2895 (La.1997), , ).
MJ Farms, Ltd. v. Exxon Mobil Corp. 998 So. 2d 16 La. 2008
Co., 95-2895 (La.5/20/97), .
State v. Armstard 991 So. 2d 116 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
Co., 95-2895 (La.5/20/97), .
Fransen v. City of New Orleans 988 So. 2d 225 La. 2008
Co., 95-2895, p. 3 (La.5/20/97), .
Banks v. Parish of Jefferson 990 So. 2d 26 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
Co., 95-2895 (La.1997), ; (La.
Veade v. Louisiana Citizens Property Corp. 985 So. 2d 1275 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
Theriot v. Midland Risk Insurance, Co.
Landry v. LOUISIANA CITIZENS PROPERTY INS. 983 So. 2d 66 La. 2008
Co., 95-2895 (La.5/20/97)
Miller v. Lammico 973 So. 2d 693 La. 2008
Co., 95-2895, p. 3 (La.5/20/97), .
State v. Fussell 974 So. 2d 1223 La. 2008
Co., 95-2895, p. 3 (La.5/20/97), .
City of New Orleans v. ASSESSORS'RETIREMENT AND RELIEF FUND 986 So. 2d 1 La. 2008
Co., 95-2895, p. 3 (La.5/20/97), .
State v. Shaw 969 So. 2d 1233 La. 2007
Johnson , 03-2993 at 11, 884 So.2d at 575 ; Theriot v. Midland Risk Insurance Company, 95-2895 (La.5/20/97)