DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Cook, 674 So. 2d 957.

1211 citing documents.

  • State v. Whatley 867 So. 2d 955 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    State v. Cook, 95-2784 (La.5/31/96), , cert.
  • State v. Beverly 867 So. 2d 107 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    [5] State v. Cook, 95-2784 (La.5/31/96), , cert.
  • State v. JTS 865 So. 2d 1032 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    As stated by the supreme court in State v. Cook, 95-2784, p. 3 (La.5/31/96); , cert.
  • State of Louisiana v. J.T.S. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
  • State of Louisiana v. Dellandra Brett Todd La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
  • State v. Todd 866 So. 2d 1040 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
    State v. Cook, 95-2784 (La.5/31/96), , cert.
  • State v. J.T.S. 865 So. 2d 1032 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
    As stated by the supreme court in State v. Cook, 95-2784, p. 3 (La.5/31/96); , cert.
  • State of Louisiana v. Carol M. Hughes La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
  • State v. Hughes 865 So. 2d 853 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
    " State v. Cook, 95-2784, p. 3 (La.5/31/96), , cert.
  • State v. Taves 861 So. 2d 144 La. 2003
    State v. Cook, 95-2784, p. 3 (La.5/31/96), ; see also State v. Soraparu, 97-1027 (La.10/13/97), .
  • State of Louisiana v. Larry Collins La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
    State v. Cook, 95-2784 (La.5/31/96)
  • State v. Collins 865 So. 2d 117 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
    State v. Cook, 95-2784 (La.5/31/96); .
  • State v. Lebreton 859 So. 2d 785 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
    On appellate review of sentence, the only relevant question is "`whether the trial court abused its broad sentencing discretion, not whether another sentence *798 might have been more appropriate.'" State v. Cook, 95-2784, p. 3 (La.5/31/96), ( (La.
  • State v. Coleman 857 So. 2d 1085 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    See State v. Cook, 95-2784, p. 3 (La.5/31/96), .
  • State v. Dabney 848 So. 2d 784 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
    State v. Cook, 95-2784, p. 3 (La.5/31/96), , cert.
  • State v. Dixon 852 So. 2d 471 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    As stated in State v. Cook, 95-2784, p. 3 (La.5/31/96); , cert.
  • State v. Augillard 853 So. 2d 17 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    Moreover, in State v. Soraparu, 97-1027 (La.10/13/97), , the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: On appellate review of sentence, the only relevant question is “ ‘whether the trial court abused its broad sentencing discretion, not whether another sentence might have been more appropriate.’ ” State v. Cook, 95-2784, p. 3 (La.5/31/96), (), cert.
  • State v. Simmons 848 So. 2d 58 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
    In State v. Soraparu, 97-1027 (La.10/13/97), , the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: On appellate review of sentence, the only relevant question is "`whether the trial court abused its broad sentencing discretion, not whether another sentence *68 might have been more appropriate.'" State v. Cook, 95-2784, p. 3 (La.5/31/96), ( (La.
  • State v. Delgado 845 So. 2d 581 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
    3 Cir. 6/5/96) , , writ denied, 96-1767 (La.12/6/96), ; State v. Cook, 95-2784 (La.5/31/96), , cert.
  • State v. Allen 844 So. 2d 1029 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    State v. Cook, 95-2784, p. 3 (La.5/31/96), .
  • State v. Marshall 843 So. 2d 469 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    State v. Cook, 95-2784 (La.5/31/96), .
  • State v. Smith 842 So. 2d 1153 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
    In State v. Soraparu, 97-1027 (La.10/13/97), , the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: On appellate review of sentence, the only relevant question is "`whether the trial court abused its broad sentencing discretion, not whether another sentence might have been more appropriate.'" State v. Cook, 95-2784, p. 3 (La.5/31/96), ( (La.
  • State v. Tarver 846 So. 2d 851 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
    State v. Cook, 95-2784 (La.5/31/96); .
  • State v. Williams 839 So. 2d 1095 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
    State v. Cook, 95-2784 (La.5/31/96); .
  • State v. Smith 846 So. 2d 786 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
    State v. Cook, 95-2784 (La.5/31/96); .
  • State v. B.A.S 838 So. 2d 155 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    95-2784, p. 3 (La.5/31/96); , cert.
  • State v. Ballou 838 So. 2d 869 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
    State v. Cook, 95-2784 (La.5/31/96); , cert.
  • State v. Alvey 839 So. 2d 395 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    In State v. Soraparu, 97-1027 (La.10/13/97), , the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: ItiOn appellate review of sentence, the only relevant question is “ “whether the trial court abused its broad sentencing discretion, not whether another sentence might have been more appropriate.’ ” State v. Cook, 95-2784, p. 3 (La.5/31/96), (), cert.
  • State v. Cedars 832 So. 2d 1191 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
    [10] State v. Cook, 95-2784, p. 3 (La.5/31/96); , cert.
  • State v. Foster 834 So. 2d 1188 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
    In State v. Soraparu, 97-1027 (La.10/13/97), , the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: On appellate review of sentence, the only relevant question is "`whether the trial court abused its broad sentencing discretion, not whether another sentence might have been more appropriate.'" State v. Cook, 95-2784, p. 3 (La.5/31/96), ( (La.
  • State v. Jefferson 834 So. 2d 572 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
    In State v. Soraparu, 97-1027 (La.10/13/97), , the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: On appellate review of sentence, the only relevant question is "whether the trial court abused its broad sentencing discretion, not whether another sentence might have been more appropriate.'" State v. Cook, 95-2784, p. 3 (La.5/31/96), ( (La.
  • State v. Wilson 836 So. 2d 2 La. 2002
    State v. Cook, 95-2784 (La.5/31/96), .
  • State v. Phillips 831 So. 2d 905 La. 2002
    In State v. Cook, 95-2784 (La.5/31/96), , cert.
  • State v. Prudhomme 829 So. 2d 1166 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
    State v. Cook, 95-2784 (La.5/31/96); , cert.
  • State v. Randle 827 So. 2d 657 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
    [6] 95-2784, p. 3 (La.5/31/96); , cert.
  • State v. Moore 827 So. 2d 647 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
    As stated by the supreme court in State v. Cook, 95-2784, p. 3 (La.5/31/96); , cert.
  • State v. Charles 827 So. 2d 553 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
    State v. Cook, 95-2784 (La.5/31/96); , cert.
  • State v. Sullivan 827 So. 2d 1260 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
    State v. Cook, 95-2784 (La.5/31/96), , cert.
  • State v. Palermo 818 So. 2d 745 La. 2002
    State v. Cook, 95-2748 (La.5/31/96), (), cert.
  • State v. Marcotte 817 So. 2d 1245 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
    State v. Cook, 95-2784, p. 3 (La.5/31/96), , cert.
  • State v. Cottrell 817 So. 2d 1211 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    Moreover, in State v. Soraparu, 97-1027 (La.10/13/97), , the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: On appellate review of sentence, the only relevant question is “ ‘whether the trial court abused its broad | ¿sentencing discretion, not whether another sentence might have been more appropriate.’ ” State v. Cook, 95-2784, p. 3 (La.5/31/96), (), cert.
  • State v. Barnes 816 So. 2d 881 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
    Moreover, in State v. Soraparu, 97-1027 (La.10/13/97), , the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: On appellate review of sentence, the only relevant question is "`whether the trial court abused its broad sentencing discretion, not whether another sentence might have been more appropriate.'" State v. Cook, 95-2784, p. 3 (La.5/31/96), ( (La.
  • State v. Rogers 812 So. 2d 809 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
    1984), State v. Cook, 95-2784 (La.5/31/96), , and State v. Smith, 93-0402 (La.7/5/94), .
  • State v. Daniel 811 So. 2d 84 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    of a sentence [is] ‘whether the trial court abused its broad sentencing discretion, not whether another sentence might have been more appropriate.’ ” State v. Cook, 95-2784 (La.5/31/96), .
  • State v. McBride 807 So. 2d 836 La. 2002
    State v. Cook, 95-2784, p. 4 (La.5/31/96), (), cert.
  • State v. Kennerson 817 So. 2d 110 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    State v. Cook, 95-2784 (La.5/31/96); , cert.
  • State v. Aleman 809 So. 2d 1056 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
    State v. Cook, 95-2784 (La.5/31/96), , cert.
  • State v. Thompson 806 So. 2d 150 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    In State v. Soraparu, 97-1027 (La.10/13/97), , the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: On appellate review of sentence, the only relevant question is “ ‘whether the trial court abused its broad sentencing discretion, not whether another sentence might liflhave been more appropriate.’” State v. Cook, 95-2784, p. 3 (La.5/31/96), ( (La.
  • State v. Bunley 805 So. 2d 292 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
    In State v. Soraparu, 97-1027 (La.10/13/97), , the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: On appellate review of sentence, the only relevant question is "`whether the trial court abused its broad sentencing discretion, not whether another sentence might have been more appropriate.'" *308 State v. Cook, 95-2784, p. 3 (La.5/31/96), ( (La.
  • State v. Walker 799 So. 2d 461 La. 2001