DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Reed, 653 So. 2d 1176.

458 citing documents.

  • State v. Rimmer 222 So. 3d 948 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
  • State v. Jamison 222 So. 3d 908 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
  • State v. Meadows 219 So. 3d 1200 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
  • State v. Robertson 216 So. 3d 1137 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
  • State v. Barr 216 So. 3d 400 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
    4/28/95), (per cu-riam).
  • State of Louisiana v. Dexter L. Brooks La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
  • State v. McDonald 217 So. 3d 574 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
  • State v. Camp 215 So. 3d 464 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
    4/28/95), , 1177 (per curiam).
  • State v. Camp 215 So. 3d 969 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
    4/28/95), , 1177 (per curiam).
  • State v. Shelby 215 So. 3d 944 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
    4/28/95), (per cu-riam).
  • State v. Dickson 215 So. 3d 886 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
  • State v. Martin 210 So. 3d 956 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
    4/28/95), , 1177 (per curiam).
  • State v. Byers 213 So. 3d 491 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2017
  • State v. Carroll 213 So. 3d 486 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
  • State v. Duncan 213 So. 3d 1247 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
  • State v. Martin 213 So. 3d 1255 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
    4/28/95), , 1177 (per curiam).
  • State v. Capers 211 So. 3d 589 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
  • State of Louisiana v. Robert Earl Sanders La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
  • State v. Sanders 209 So. 3d 143 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
  • State v. Davis 206 So. 3d 452 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
    4/28/95), (per cu-riam).
  • State v. Smith 206 So. 3d 444 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
  • State v. Stokes 205 So. 3d 1025 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
  • State v. Harris 205 So. 3d 1042 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
  • State v. Joseph 205 So. 3d 1013 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
    4/28/95), , 1177 (per curiam).
  • State of Louisiana v. John J. Landry III La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
  • State v. Shelton 207 So. 3d 549 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
  • State v. Gardner 202 So. 3d 513 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2016
  • State v. Nicholas 196 So. 3d 864 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
    4th Cir.1990), which Were sanctioned by the Louisiana Supreme Court in State v. Mouton, 95-0981 (La.4/28/95), (per curiam).
  • State v. Wong 198 So. 3d 149 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
    See, Anders, supra; State v. Jyles, 1996-2669 (La.12/12/97), ; State v. Mouton, 1995-0981 (La.04/28/95), ; (La.App.
  • State v. Nelson 197 So. 3d 713 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
    1396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967); State v. Jyles, 96-2669 (La.12/12/97), ; State v. Mouton, 95-0981 (La.4/28/95), ; (La.App.
  • State of Louisiana v. Javin James Benoit AKA Javin Benoit La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
  • State of Louisiana v. Donny R. Morgan La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
  • State of Louisiana v. Mitchell A. Flemming, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
  • State v. Benoit 195 So. 3d 668 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
    An appellate counsel’s Anders brief must review the record and provide “a detailed and reviewable assessment for both the defendant and the appellate court of whether the appeal is worth pursuing in the first place.” State v. Mouton, 95-981, p. 2 (La.4/28/95), .
  • State v. Flemming 194 So. 3d 1195 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
    Thus, counsel’s Anders brief must review the procedural history and the evidence *1199 presented at trial and provide “a detailed and renewable assessment for both the defendant and the appellate court of whether the appeal is worth pursuing in the first place.” State v. Mouton, 95-981, p. 2 (La.4/28/95), .
  • State v. Otkins-Victor 193 So. 3d 479 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
    See State v. Reed, 95-0648 (La.4/28/95), , where the Louisiana Supreme Court noted that the allotment procedure at issue was one where homicide and rape cases were randomly allotted to divisions; however, divisions that had been previously allotted homicide and rape cases could not be allotted another homicide or rape case until each division had received on
  • State v. Victor 195 So. 3d 128 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
    See State v. Reed, 95-0648 (La.4/28/95), , where the Louisiana Supreme Court noted that tire allotment procedure at issue was one where homicide and rape cases were randomly allotted to divisions; however, divisions that had been previously allotted homicide and rape cases could not be allotted another homicide or rape case until each division had received o
  • State of Louisiana Versus Errol Victor, Sr. La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2016
    4/28/95), where the Louisiana Supreme Court noted that the allotment procedure at issue was one where homicide and rape cases were randomly allotted to divisions; however, divisions that had been previously allotted homicide and rape cases could not be allotted another homicide or rape case until each division had received one
  • State v. Durall 192 So. 3d 285 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
    4 Cir. 1990), which were sanctioned by the Louisiana Supreme Court in State v. Mouton, 95-0981 (La.4/28/95), , 1177 (per curiam ).
  • State v. Durall 192 So. 3d 310 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
    4 Cir.1990), which were sanctioned by the Louisiana Supreme Court in State v. Mouton, 95-0981 (La.4/28/95), , 1177 (per curiam ); .
  • State of Louisiana v. Tavares Charles La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
  • State of Louisiana v. Therand Guy Thacker La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
  • State v. Thacker 187 So. 3d 552 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
    Thus, counsel’s Anders brief must review the procedural history and the evidence presented in the lower court and contain “a detailed and reviewable assessment for both the defendant and the, appellate court of whether the appeal is worth pursuing |uin the first place.” State v. Mouton, 95-981, p. 2 (La.4/28/95), .
  • State of Louisiana v. Jamarlon W. Pierre La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
  • State v. Gipson 189 So. 3d 1147 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
    See Anders v. California, supra; State v, Jyles, 96-2669 (La.12/12/97), ; State v. Mou *1149 ton, 95-0981 (La.4/28/95), ; (La.App.
  • State v. Smith 186 So. 3d 794 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
    See Jyles, 704 So.2d at 242 ; State v. Mouton, 95-0981, p. 2 (La.4/28/95)
  • State v. Faggard 184 So. 3d 837 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
    4 Cir.1990), which were sanctioned by the Louisiana Supreme Court in State v. Mouton, 95-0981, pp. 1-2 (La.4/28/95), (per curiam).
  • State v. Chess 184 So. 3d 833 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
    4th Cir.1990), which were sanctioned by the Louisiana Supreme Court in State v. Mouton, 95-981 (La.4/28/95), (per curiam).
  • State v. Downs 186 So. 3d 207 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
    See also State v. Jyles, 1996-2669 (La.12/12/97), ; State v. Mouton, 1995-0981 (La.04/28/95), ; and, (La.App.
  • State v. Ussin 182 So. 3d 1226 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2015
    4th Cir.1990), which were sanctioned by the Louisiana Supreme Court in State v. Mouton, 95-0981 (La.4/28/95); (per curiam).