DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Reed, 653 So. 2d 1176.

458 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana v. Andrew Schlesinger AKA - Andrew Devon Schlesinger La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
  • State v. Williams 179 So. 3d 878 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2015
    Court in State v. Mouton, 95-0981 (La.4/28/95); (per curiam).
  • State of Louisiana v. Cheryl A. Schonsby AKA Cheryl Anne Schonsby La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
  • State v. Kent 178 So. 3d 219 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    4 Cir.1990), which were sanctioned by the Louisiana Supreme Court in State v. Mouton, 95-0981 (La.4/28/95), (percuriam).
  • State of Louisiana v. Nathaniel Wayne Carmouche La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
  • State of Louisiana v. Michael Lee Jones La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
  • State of Louisiana v. Chad Perkins La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
  • State v. Thompson 178 So. 3d 1058 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
    State v. Mouton, 1995-0981 (La.04/28/95), , citing, (La.App.
  • State v. Warren 181 So. 3d 166 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
    1396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967); State v. Jyles, 96-2669 (La.12/12/97), ; State v. Mouton, 95-0981 (La.4/28/95), ; (La.App.
  • State v. Woods 176 So. 3d 672 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    4 Cir.1990), which were sanctioned by the Louisiana Supreme Court in State v. Mouton, 95-981 (La.4/28/95), (percuriam).
  • State v. Rome 176 So. 3d 721 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2015
    4th Cir.1990), which were sanctioned by the Louisiana Supreme Court in State v. Mouton, 95-0981 (La.4/28/95); (per curiam).
  • State v. Nunez 174 So. 3d 105 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    See, e.g.; State v. Reed, 95-0648 (La.4/28/95), (per curiam); *121 (per curiam).
  • State v. Brown 174 So. 3d 95 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    The defendant notes that, pursuant to State v. Reed, 95-0648 (La.28/95), , the accused is entitled to enforcement of the court rule requiring random allotment without proving actual manipulation in his particular case.
  • State v. Breaux 171 So. 3d 1234 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    4 Cir.1990), which were sanctioned by the Louisiana Supreme Court in State v. Mouton, 95-0981 (La.4/28/95), (per curiam ).
  • State v. Stuart 171 So. 3d 1230 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    4 Cir. 1990), which were sanctioned by the Louisiana Supreme Court in State v. Mouton, 95-0981 (La.4/28/95), (per curiam ).
  • State v. Lee 171 So. 3d 1214 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    The procedure set forth in Benjamin for compliance with Anders was sanctioned by the Louisiana Supreme Court in State v. Mouton, 95-0981 (La.4/28/95), (per curiam), and adopted by this Court in State v. Bradford, 95-929 (La.App.
  • State of Louisiana v. Maurice Joseph Goodman La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
  • State v. Goodman 165 So. 3d 1285 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    Thus, counsel’s Anders brief must review the procedural history and the evidence presented at trial and provide “ ‘a detailed and reviewable assessment for both the defendant and the appellate court of whether the appeal is worth pursuing in the first place.’ ” State v. Mouton, 95-981, p. 2 (La.4/28/95), .
  • State v. Kirk 166 So. 3d 392 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
    See Anders v. California, supra; State v. Jyles, 96-2669 (La.12/12/97), ; State v. Mouton, 95-0981 (La.4/28/95), ; (La.App.
  • State of Louisiana v. Jevante Jamal Biron La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
  • State of Louisiana v. Jamarlon W. Pierre La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
  • State v. Pierre 165 So. 3d 365 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    Counsel’s Anders brief, therefore, must review the procedural history, the evidence presented in the lower court, and “a detailed and réviewable assessment for both the defendant and the appellate court of whether the appeal is worth pursuing in the first place.” State v. Mouton, 95-0981, p. 2 (La.4/28/95), .
  • State v. Wilt 170 So. 3d 317 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    4 Cir.1990), which were sanctioned by the Louisiana Supreme Court in State v. Mouton, 95-0981, pp. 1-2 (La.4/28/95), (per curiam).
  • State v. Banks 163 So. 3d 895 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
    State v. Anders, supra; State v. Jyles, 96-2669 (La.12/12/97), ; State v. Mouton, 95-0981 (La.4/28/95), ; State v. Benjamin, supra.
  • State v. Jones 163 So. 3d 875 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
    1396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967); State v. Jyles, 96-2669 (La.12/12/97), ; State v. Mouton, 95-0981 (La.04/28/95), ; (La.App.
  • State v. Robinson 170 So. 3d 300 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2015
    The procedure set forth in Benjamin for compliance with Anders was sanctioned by *303 the Louisiana Supreme Court in State v. Mouton, 95-0981, pp. 1-2 (La.4/28/95), (per curiam), and adopted by this Court in State v. Bradford, 95-929, pp. 3-4 (La.App.
  • State of Louisiana v. Robert Harris La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
  • State of Louisiana v. Richard Bamburg La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
  • State v. Alfaro 168 So. 3d 761 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    4 Cir.1990), which were sanctioned by the Louisiana Supreme Court in State v. Mouton, 95-0981 (La.4/28/95), (per curiam).
  • State v. Gayden 168 So. 3d 766 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    4 Cir.1990), which were sanctioned by the Louisiana Supreme Court in State v. Mouton, 95-0981 (La.4/28/95), (per curiam).
  • State v. Gayton 158 So. 3d 955 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    (per curiam) (sanctioning the Benjamin procedure); (remanding the matter to the First Circuit Court of Appeal, instructing the Court to follow the procedure |7outlined in Benjamin); State v. Mouton, 95-0981 (La.4/28/95); (per curiam) (instructing the Third Circuit Court of Appeal to apply the procedure set forth in Benjamin); Jyles , 96-2669; (confirming the Court’s general endorsement of the procedures outlined in Benjamin and further clarifying the duty of counsel to provide constitutionally-e
  • State v. Aguilar 167 So. 3d 862 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    4 Cir.1990), which were sanctioned by the Louisiana Supreme Court in State v. Mouton, 95-0981 (La.4/28/95), (per cu-riam ).
  • State v. Britton 167 So. 3d 843 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    4 Cir.1990), and sanctioned by the Louisiana Supreme Court in State v. Mouton, 95-0981 (La.4/28/95), (per curiam).
  • State of Louisiana v. Benjamin Gottke AKA Benjamin A. Gottke AKA Benjamine A. Gottke La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
  • State v. Gottke 154 So. 3d 1250 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    Appellate counsel’s Anders brief must review the record and provide “a detailed and reviewable assessment for both the defendant and the appellate court of whether the appeal is worth pursuing in the first place.” State v. Mouton, 95-981, p. 2 (La.4/28/95), .
  • State v. Oliver 165 So. 3d 970 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    4 Cir. 1990), which were sanctioned by the Louisiana Supreme Court in State v. Mouton, 95-0981 (La.4/28/95), (per curiam ).
  • State of Louisiana v. Kerry M. Guinn La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
  • State v. Guinn 159 So. 3d 1073 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2014
    Thus, counsel’s Anders brief must review the procedural history and the |sevidence presented at trial and provide “a detailed and reviewable assessment for both the defendant and the appellate court of whether the appeal is worth pursuing in the first place.” State v. Mouton, 95-981, p. 2 (La.4/28/95), .
  • State v. Jaufre 164 So. 3d 888 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2014
    4th Cir. 1990), which were sanctioned by the Louisiana Supreme Court in State v. Mouton, 95-0981 (La.4/28/95); (per curiam ).
  • State v. Fontenette 164 So. 3d 880 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2014
    4th Cir.1990), which were sanctioned by the Louisiana Supreme Court in State v. Mouton, 95-0981 (La.4/28/95); (per curiam ).
  • State v. Earwood 164 So. 3d 883 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    4th Cir.1990), which were sanctioned by the Louisiana Supreme Court in State v. Mouton, 95-0981 (La.4/28/95), (per curiam ).
  • State of Louisiana v. Terrance Wayne Anderson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
  • State of Louisiana v. Terrance Anderson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
  • State of Louisiana v. Terrance Wayne Anderson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
  • State of Louisiana v. Terrance Wayne Anderson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
  • State of Louisiana v. Terrance Anderson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
  • State v. Reynolds 149 So. 3d 471 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
    See Anders, supra; State v. Jyles, 96-2669 (La.12/12/97), ; State v. Mouton, 95-0981 (La.04/28/95), ; (La.App.
  • State of Louisiana v. Robert N. Johnson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
  • State v. Clark 149 So. 3d 443 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    1396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967); State v. Jyles, 96-2669 (La.12/12/97), ; State v. Mouton, 95-0981 (La.04/28/95), ; (La.App.
  • State v. Finley 146 So. 3d 962 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
    See Anders v. California, supra; State v. Jyles, 96-2669 (La.12/12/97), ; State v. Mouton, 95-0981 (La.04/28/95), ; and, (La.App.