DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Reed, 653 So. 2d 1176.

458 citing documents.

  • State v. Stockman 147 So. 3d 263 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    4 Cir. 1990), which were sanctioned by the Louisiana Supreme Court in State v. Mouton, 95-0981 (La.4/28/95), (per curiam ).
  • State of Louisiana v. Chad Michael Mouton La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
  • State v. Mendez 140 So. 3d 284 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    12/12/97), ; State v. Mouton, 95-0981 (La.4/28/95), ; (La.App.
  • State v. Hoppens 140 So. 3d 293 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    4 Cir. 1990), and sanctioned by the Louisiana Supreme Court in State v. Mouton, 95-0981 (La.4/28/95), (percuriam).
  • State v. Coleman 137 So. 3d 149 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
    Anders v. California, supra; State v. Jyles, 96-2669 (La.12/12/97), ; State v. Mouton, 95-0981 (La.4/28/95)
  • State v. Goff 140 So. 3d 146 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    The procedure set forth in Benjamin for compliance with Anders was sanctioned by the Louisiana Supreme Court in State v. Mouton, 95-0981 (La.4/28/95), (per curiam), and adopted by this Court in State v. Bradford, 95-929 (La.App.
  • State of Louisiana v. Cornelius Eugene Wilson AKA N.O. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
  • State v. Wilson 135 So. 3d 842 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    *844 This approach was approved by the supreme court in State v. Mouton, 95-981 (La.4/28/95), .
  • State v. Gros 138 So. 3d 763 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    App. 4 Cir. 1990), and sanctioned by the Louisiana Supreme Court in State v. Mouton, 95-0981 (La.4/28/95), (per curiam).
  • State v. Frazier 134 So. 3d 1255 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
    See Anders v. California, supra; State v. Jyles, 1996-2669 (La.12/12/97), ; State v. Mouton, 1995-0981 (La.04/28/95), ; (La.App.
  • State v. Griffin 136 So. 3d 379 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    The procedure set forth in Benjamin for compliance with Anders, infra, was sanctioned by the Louisiana Supreme Court in State v. Mouton, 95-0981 (La.4/28/95), (per curiam), and adopted by this Court in State v. Bradford, 95-929 (La.App.
  • State v. Banks 136 So. 3d 937 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
    Anders v. State, supra; State v. Jyles, 96-2669 (La.12/12/97), ; State v. Mouton, 95-0981 (La.4/28/95), ; State v. Benjamin, supra.
  • State v. Williams 135 So. 3d 789 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
    1396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967); State v. Jyles, 96-2669 (La.12/12/97), ; State v. Mouton, 95-0981 (La.4/28/95), ; (La.App.
  • State of Louisiana v. Ronald Millard Irby La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
  • State of Louisiana v. Wesley James Monroe La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
  • State of Louisiana v. Wesley James Monroe La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
  • State v. Stewart 134 So. 3d 636 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    4 Cir.1990) was sanctioned by the Louisiana Supreme Court in State v. Mouton, 95-0981 (La.4/28/95), (per curiam ), and adopted by this Court in State v. Bradford, 95-929 (La.App.
  • State v. Cox 134 So. 3d 68 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    4 Cir. 1990), and sanctioned by the Louisiana Supreme Court in State v. Mouton, 95-0981 (La.4/28/95), (per curiam).
  • State v. Cox 134 So. 3d 74 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    12/12/97); ; State v. Mouton, 95-981 (La.4/28/95); ; (La.App.
  • State v. Rivera 134 So. 3d 61 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    The procedure set forth in Benjamin for compliance with Anders was sanctioned by the Louisiana Supreme Court in State v. Mouton, 95-0981 (La.4/28/95), (per curiam ), and adopted by this Court in State v. Bradford, 95-929 (La.App.
  • State v. Ricks 131 So. 3d 1117 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    The procedure set forth in Benjamin for compliance with Anders was sanctioned by the Louisiana Supreme Court in State v. Mouton, 95-0981, pp. 1-2 (La.4/28/95), (per curiam), and adopted by this Court in State v. Bradford, 95-929, pp. 3-4 (La.App.
  • State of Louisiana v. Tommy Paul Bourque La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
  • State v. Walker 128 So. 3d 1205 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    4 Cir. 1990), and sanctioned by the Louisiana Supreme Court in State v. Mouton, 95-0981 (La.4/28/95), (per curiam).
  • State v. Harris 128 So. 3d 1178 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    The procedure set forth in Benjamin for compliance with Anders was sanctioned by the Louisiana Supreme Court in State v. Mouton, 95-0981 (La.4/28/95), (per curiam ), and adopted by this Court in State v. Bradford, 95-929 (La.App.
  • State of Louisiana v. Frank Allen Fregia, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
  • State v. Fregia 157 So. 3d 80 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    See, e.g., State v. Mouton, 95-981 (La.4/28/95), .
  • State v. Weber 128 So. 3d 344 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    The procedure set forth in Benjamin for compliance with Anders was sanctioned by the Louisiana Supreme Court in State v. Mouton, 95-0981 (La.4/28/95), (per curiam), and adopted by this Court in State v. Bradford, 95-929 (La.App.
  • State v. Coleman 124 So. 3d 1191 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
    See Anders v. California, supra; State v. Jyles, 96-2669 (La.12/12/97), ; State v. Mouton, 95-0981 (La.04/28/95), ; (La.App.
  • State v. Bruce 121 So. 3d 796 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    The procedure set forth in Benjamin for compliance with Anders was sanctioned by the Louisiana Supreme Court in State v. Mouton, 95-0981 (La.4/28/95), (per curiam), and adopted by this Court in State v. Bradford, 95-929 (La.App.
  • State of Louisiana v. Darious D. Rogers La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
    In State v. Mouton, 95-981 (La.4/28/95), (La.App.
  • State of Louisiana v. Ramon L. Ellender La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
  • State v. Simmons 114 So. 3d 535 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
    See Anders v. California, supra; State v. Jyles, 96-2669 (La.12/12/97), ; State v. Mouton, 95-0981 (La.4/28/95), ; State v. Benjamin, supra.
  • State of Louisiana v. Simcoe Cole AKA Simco W. Cole La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
  • State of Louisiana v. Harvey G. Love La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
  • State v. Desadier 113 So. 3d 1193 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
    See Anders v. California, supra; State v. Jyles, 96-2669 (La.12/12/97), ; State v. Mouton, 95-0981 (La.4/28/95), ; State v. Benjamin, supra.
  • State v. Kennedy 112 So. 3d 1037 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
    1396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967); State v. Jyles, 96-2669 (La.12/12/97), ; State v. Monton, 95-0981 (La.4/28/95), ; (La.App.
  • State v. Ford 113 So. 3d 319 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    The procedure set forth in Benjamin for compliance with Anders was sanctioned by the Louisiana Supreme Court in State v. Mouton, 95-0981 (La.4/28/95), (per curiam), and adopted by this Court in State v. Bradford, 95-929 (La.App.
  • State of Louisiana v. Benjamin Caleb Wiemelt La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
  • State v. Aguillar 110 So. 3d 1205 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    The procedure set forth in Benjamin for compliance with Anders was sanctioned by the Louisiana Supreme Court in State v. Mouton, 95-0981, pp. 1-2 (La.4/28/95), (per curiam), and adopted by this Court in State v. Bradford, 95-929, pp. 3-4 (La.App.
  • State of Louisiana v. Richard Vital La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
  • State of Louisiana v. Richard Vital La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
  • State v. Vital 107 So. 3d 1274 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    Thus, appellate counsel’s Anders brief must review the procedural history and the evidence presented at trial and provide “a detailed and renewable assessment for both the defendant and the appellate court of whether the appeal is worth pursuing in the first place.” State v. Mouton, 95-981, p. 2 (La.4/28/95), .
  • State v. Vital 107 So. 3d 1279 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    Thus, appellate counsel’s Anders brief must review the procedural history and the evidence presented at trial and provide “a detailed and reviewable assessment for both the defendant and the appellate court of whether the appeal is worth pursuing in the first place.” State v. Mouton, 95-981, p. 2 (La.4/28/95), .
  • State v. Skinner 108 So. 3d 1200 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2013
    95-0981 (La.4/28/95); , 1177 (per curiam).
  • State v. Chelette 106 So. 3d 1252 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2012
    The procedure set forth in Benjamin for compliance with Anders was sanctioned by the Louisiana Supreme Court in State v. Mouton, 95-0981 (La.4/28/95); (per curiam), and adopted by this Court in State v. Bradford, 95-929 (La.App.
  • State v. Newman 107 So. 3d 775 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    The procedure set forth in Benjamin for compliance with Anders was sanctioned by the Louisiana Supreme Court in State v. Mouton, 95-0981, pp. 1-2 (La.4/28/95), (per curiam), and adopted by this Court in State v. Bradford, 95-929, pp. 3-4 (La.App.
  • State v. Williams 106 So. 3d 1068 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2012
    95-0981 (La.4/28/95); , 1177 (per curiam).
  • State v. Drew 107 So. 3d 748 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
    See Anders v. California, supra at note 1; State v. Jyles, 96-2669 (La.12/12/97), ; State v. Mouton, 95-0981 (La.4/28/95), ; (La.App.
  • State v. Hedgespeth 107 So. 3d 743 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
    1396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967); State v. Jyles, 96-2669 (La.12/12/97), ; State v. Mouton, 95-0981 (La.4/28/95), ; (La.App.
  • State v. Culverhouse 107 So. 3d 736 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
    1396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967); State v. Jyles, 96-2669 (La.12/12/97), ; State v. Mouton, 95-0981 (La.4/28/95), ; and, (La.App.