DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Syrie v. Schilhab, 693 So. 2d 1173.

139 citing documents.

  • Daniels v. Essex Insurance Co. 890 So. 2d 599 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
    Posecai v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 99-1222, (La.11/30/99) , citing Syrie v. Schilhab, 96-1027, p. 4-5 (La.5/20/97), -77 ; Berry v. State, 93-2748, p. 4 (La.5/23/94), , 414.
  • Domingue v. Lafayette Parish School Bd. 879 So. 2d 288 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    Syrie v. Schilhab, 96-1027 (La.5/20/97), .
  • Valerie Duhon Domingue v. Lafayette Parish School Board La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    Syrie v. Schilhab, 96- 2 1027 (La.5/20/97)
  • Althea Wellman, Tutrix of Jared L. Samuel v. Johnny M. Evans, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    Syrie v. Schilhab, 96-1027 (La.5/20/97)
  • Wellman v. Evans 876 So. 2d 954 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
    Syrie v. Schilhab, 96-1027 (La.5/20/97), .
  • Hayes v. Eagle, Inc. 876 So. 2d 108 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2004
    Syrie v. Schilhab, 96-1027, (La.5/20/97), .
  • Nalty v. D.H. Holmes Co. 882 So. 2d 1 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
    Syrie v. Schillab, 96-1027 (La.5/20/97), .
  • Scramuzza v. River Oaks Inc. 871 So. 2d 522 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
    Syrie v. Schilhab, 96-1027 (La.5/20/97); .
  • Lakeland Anesth., Inc. v. United Health. of La. 871 So. 2d 380 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2004
    Syrie v. Schilhab, 96-1027, (La.5/20/97), .
  • Robert Troy Richard v. Karl M. Miller La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    5/20/97), -77, the supreme court set out the duty-risk analysis used to determine whether liability exists: Under this analysis, plaintiff must prove that the conduct in question was a cause-in-fact of the resulting harm, the defendant owed a duty of care to the plaintiff, the requisite dut
  • Richard v. Miller 867 So. 2d 983 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    Negligence In Syrie v. Schilhab, 96-1027, pp. 4-5 (La.5/20/97), -77 , the supreme court set out the duty-risk analysis used to determine whether liability exists: Under this analysis, plaintiff must prove that the conduct in question was a cause-in-fact of the resulting harm, the defendant owed a duty of care to the plaintiff, the requisite duty was breached by the defendant
  • Racca v. St. Mary Sugar Cooperative, Inc. 872 So. 2d 1117 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
    Syrie v. Schilhab, 96-1027 (La.5/20/97), .
  • Racca v. ST. MARY SUGAR CO-OP., INC. 872 So. 2d 1117 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
    Syrie v. Schilhab, 96-1027 (La.5/20/97), .
  • Oubre v. Eslaih 869 So. 2d 71 La. 2004
    Davis v. Witt, 02-3102 (La.7/2/03), ; Syrie v. Schilhab, 96-1027 (La.5/20/97), ; Monceaux v. Jennings Rice Drier, Inc., (La.App.
  • Ott v. Clarkson 863 So. 2d 663 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    Syrie v. Schil-hab, 96-1027 (La.5/20/97), .
  • Pritchard v. AMERICAN FREIGHTWAYS CORP. 862 So. 2d 476 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
    Posecai v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., XXXX-XXXX (La.11/30/99), ; Syrie v. Schilhab, 96-1027 (La.05/20/97), .
  • Quinn v. GGS, L.L.C. 862 So. 2d 324 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    Syrie v. Schilhab, 96-1027 (La.5/20/97); ; Ferrell v. Fireman’s Fund Ins.
  • Smith v. AAA Travel Agency 859 So. 2d 286 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
    Posecai v. Wal-Mart Stores, supra at 4, 752 So.2d at 765 ; Syrie v. Schilhab, 96-1027 (La.5/20/97), .
  • Lazard v. Foti 859 So. 2d 656 La. 2003
    Syrie v. Schilhab, 96-1027 (La.5/20/97), .
  • Sullivan v. Murphy 852 So. 2d 1277 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    The supreme court noted in Syrie v. Schilhab, 96-1027 (La.5/20/97), , that the legislature has given law enforcement officers the exclusive power to regulate traffic.
  • Davis v. Witt 851 So. 2d 1119 La. 2003
    In Syrie v. Schilhab, 96-1027 (La.5/20/97), , this Court considered the reasonableness test adopted in the Mathieu opinion, a case involving law enforcement officers in a criminal arrest setting, and extended its application to the duty of law enforcement officers who were in control of an accident scene.
  • Hall v. Brookshire Bros., Ltd. 848 So. 2d 559 La. 2003
    Graves v. Page, 96-2201 (La.11/7/97), ; Syrie v. Schilhab, 96-1027 (La.5/20/97), .
  • Kappa Loyal v. Plaisance Dragline & Dredg. 848 So. 2d 765 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
    [3] Syrie v. Schilhab, 96-1027 (La.5/20/97), ; Lakeland Anesthesia, Inc. v. CIGNA Healthcare of LA, Inc., XXXX-XXXX (La.
  • State Farm Fire and Cas. Co. v. MLT CON. 849 So. 2d 762 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
    Syrie v. Schilhab, 96-1027, p. 4 (La.5/20/97), .
  • Jones v. Congemi 848 So. 2d 41 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
    In Syrie v. Schilhab, 96-1027 (La.5/20/97), , the Louisiana Supreme Court stated that law enforcement officers have the exclusive power to regulate traffic, and they are duty bound to exercise this power in a reasonable manner to protect people and to refrain from causing injury or harm.
  • Simpson v. Pep Boys-Manny Moe & Jack, Inc. 847 So. 2d 617 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
    Syrie v. Schilhab, 96-1027, (La.5/20/97), .
  • Flint v. Trolley Stop 843 So. 2d 635 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    Syrie v. Schilhab, 96-1027 (La.5/20/97), .
  • Hutchins v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. 844 So. 2d 168 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
    Syrie v. Schilhab, 96-1027 (La.5/20/1997), -1177 , citing Monceaux v. Jennings Rice Drier, Inc., (La.App.
  • Dwyer v. Early 842 So. 2d 1124 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
    See Syrie v. Schilhab, 96-1027, p. 3 (La.5/20/97), .
  • Oubre v. Eslaih 840 So. 2d 54 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    Syrie v. Schilhab, 96-1027 (La.5/20/97), ; Edwards v. Daugherty, 97-1542 (La.App.
  • Sacco v. Allred 845 So. 2d 528 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    Syrie v. Schilhab, 96-1027, p. 5 (La.5/20/97), ; Lavine v. Jackson, 97-2804, p. 5 (La.App.
  • Reaux v. Deep South Equipment Co. 840 So. 2d 20 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    Syrie v. Schilhab, 96-1027, p. 4-5 (La.5/20/97), -77 ; Berry v. State, 93-2748, p. 4 (La.5/23/94), , 414.
  • Lavergne v. America's Pizza Company, LLC 838 So. 2d 845 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
    Syrie v. Schilhab, 96-1027 (La.5/20/97), .
  • Henry v. Parish of Jefferson 835 So. 2d 912 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
    Syrie v. Schilhab, 96-1027, p. 4-5 (La.5/20/97), -77 ; Berry v. State, 93-2748, p. 4 (La.5/23/94), , 414.
  • Updegraff v. STATE EX REL. DOTD 828 So. 2d 693 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
    See Syrie v. Schilhab, 96-1027 (La.5/20/97), .
  • Asbestos v. Borden, Inc. 826 So. 2d 581 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
    Syrie v. Schilhab, 96-1027 *586 (La.5/20/97), .
  • Dugas v. Derouen 824 So. 2d 475 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
    Syrie v. Schilhab, 96-1027 (La.5/20/97), .
  • Randall v. Chalmette Medical Center, Inc. 819 So. 2d 1129 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    Syrie v. Schilhab, 96-1027, p. 4-5 (La.5/20/97), -77 ; Berry v. State, 93-2748, p. 4 (La.5/23/94), , 414.
  • Blackford v. Chateau East, Inc. 816 So. 2d 953 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    Syrie v. Schilhab, 96-1027 (La.5/20/97), .
  • Dorty v. City of Pineville 815 So. 2d 393 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
    In Syrie v. Schilhab, 96-1027, pp. 4-5 (La.5/20/97), -77 , the Supreme Court set out the duty-risk analysis used to determine whether liability exists: Under this analysis, plaintiff must prove that the conduct in question was a cause-in-fact of the resulting harm, the defendant owed a duty of care to the plaintiff, the requisite duty was breached by the defendant
  • Seal v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co. 816 So. 2d 868 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
    Syrie v. Schilhab, 96-1027 (La.5/20/97), .
  • Joseph v. Entergy 811 So. 2d 54 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
    Syrie v. Schilhab, 96-1027 (La.5/20/97), .
  • Lakeland Anesthesia, Inc. v. Cigna Healthcare of Louisiana, Inc. 812 So. 2d 695 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
    Syrie v. Schilhab, 96-1027, *698 (La.5/20/97), .
  • Schreiber v. JEWISH FEDERATION 839 So. 2d 51 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
    Syrie v. Schilhab, 96-1027, pp. 4-5 (La.5/20/97), -1177 .
  • Serigne v. Ivker 808 So. 2d 783 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
    Syrie v. Schilhab, 96-1027 (La.5/20/97), .
  • Price v. Medical Center of Louisiana at New Orleans-University Campus 804 So. 2d 743 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    Syrie v. Schilhab, 96-1027 (La.5/20/97), .
  • Misuraca v. City of Kenner 802 So. 2d 784 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
    In Syrie v. Schilhab, 96-1027 (La.5/20/97), , the Louisiana Supreme Court enunciated the duty of law enforcement officers: [The] legislature has given law enforcement officers the exclusive power to regulate traffic and the public has a corresponding obligation to follow traffic regulations.
  • Young v. First National Bank of Shreveport 794 So. 2d 128 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
    Syrie v. Schilhab, 96-1027 (La.5/20/97), .
  • In Re New Orleans Train Car Leakage Fire Litigation 795 So. 2d 364 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
    Syrie v. Schilhab, 96-1027, p. 4-5 (La.5/20/97), -77 ; Berry v. State, 93-2748, p. 4 (La.5/23/94), , 414.
  • Menard v. City of Lafayette 786 So. 2d 354 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
    Syrie v. Schilhab, 96-1027, p. 4-5 (La.5/20/97); -77 ; Berry v. State, Through Dept. of Health and Human Resources, 93-2748, p. 4 (La.5/23/94)