Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Major, 708 So. 2d 813.

105 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana v. Navarri R. Henderson La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2025
  • State of Louisiana v. Perry L. Briley La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2025
  • State of Louisiana v. John Honore La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2025
  • State of Louisiana v. Tyrone A. Stewart La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2025
  • State of Louisiana v. Jkari Campbell La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2025
  • State of Louisiana v. Darrell Clark La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2024
  • State of Louisiana v. William A. McDonough La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2023
    App. 46 4 Cir. 3/4/98), ).
  • State of Louisiana v. Trae Williams La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2023
    App. 4 Cir. 3/4/98), : The articulation of the factual basis for a sentence is the goal of [La.
  • State of Louisiana v. Elijah Mealancon La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2021
  • State of Louisiana v. Simuel Shaw Jr La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2019
  • State v. Williams 265 So. 3d 902 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
    App. 4 Cir. 3/4/98), , 819 (articulation of the factual basis for a sentence is the goal of Art. 894.1, not rigid or mechanical compliance with its provisions.
  • State v. Bibbins 258 So. 3d 134 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
    App. 4 Cir. 3/4/98), : The articulation of the factual basis for a sentence is the goal of Art. 894.1, not rigid or mechanical compliance with its provisions.
  • State v. Contreras 247 So. 3d 858 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
    App. 4 Cir. 3/4/98), , 819 ).
  • State v. Doucette 243 So. 3d 704 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
    App. 4 Cir. 3/4/98), : The articulation of the factual basis for a sentence is the goal of Art. 894.1, not rigid or mechanical compliance with its provisions.
  • State of Louisiana v. Danial Lewayne Lafleur -Aka- Daniel Lafleur -Aka- Daniel Lee Lafleur -Aka- Danial Lafleur La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
    4 Cir. 3/4/98), this court stated: The articulation of the factual basis for a sentence is the goal of Art. 894.1, not rigid or mechanical compliance with its provisions.
  • State v. Lafleur 209 So. 3d 927 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
    4 Cir. 3/4/98) , , this court stated: The articulation of the factual basis for a sentence is the goal of Art. 894.1, not rigid or mechanical compliance with its provisions.
  • State v. Ladd 192 So. 3d 235 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
    4 Cir. 3/4/98), : The articulation of the factual basis for a sentence is the goal of Art. 894.1, not rigid or mechanical compliance with its provisions.
  • State v. Ellis 190 So. 3d 354 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
  • State v. Mack 162 So. 3d 1284 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
  • State v. Alverez 158 So. 3d 142 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
  • State v. Bowens 156 So. 3d 770 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    4 Cir. 3/4/98), , this Court stated: The articulation of the factual basis for a sentence is the goal of Art. 894.1, not rigid or mechanical compliance with its provisions.
  • State v. Jasper 149 So. 3d 1239 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
  • State v. Martin 141 So. 3d 933 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
  • State v. Carter 131 So. 3d 153 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    4 Cir. 3/4/98), : The articulation of the factual basis for a sentence is the goal of Art. 894.1, not rigid or mechanical compliance with its provisions.
  • State v. Vargas-Alcerreca 126 So. 3d 569 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
  • State v. Hollins 123 So. 3d 840 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    4 Cir. 3/4/98), , 819 this court stated: The articulation of the factual basis for a sentence is the goal of Art. 894.1, not rigid or mechanical compliance with its provisions.
  • State v. Peters 123 So. 3d 307 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    4 Cir. 8/4/98), : The articulation of the factual basis for a sentence is the goal of Art. 894.1, not rigid or mechanical compliance with its provisions.
  • State v. Jones 122 So. 3d 1065 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
  • State v. Santos-Castro 120 So. 3d 933 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
  • State v. Marcelin 116 So. 3d 928 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    4 Cir. 3/4/98), : The articulation of the factual basis for a sentence is the goal of Art. 894.1, not rigid or mechanical compliance with its provisions.
  • Explained State v. Burton 116 So. 3d 863 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
  • State v. Veal 116 So. 3d 779 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    4 Cir. 3/4/98), : The articulation of the factual basis for a sentence is the goal of Art. 894.1, not rigid or mechanical compliance with its provisions.
  • State v. Slattery 116 So. 3d 804 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    4 Cir. 3/4/98), : The articulation of the factual basis for a sentence is the goal of Art. 894.1, not rigid or mechanical compliance with its provisions.
  • State v. Sipp 104 So. 3d 648 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
  • State v. Boudreaux 98 So. 3d 881 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
  • State v. Williams 85 So. 3d 759 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    4 Cir. 3/4/98), : The articulation of the factual basis for a sentence is the goal of Art. 894.1, not rigid or mechanical compliance with its provisions.
  • State v. Lomax 81 So. 3d 788 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    4 Cir. 3/4/98), , 819 this Court stated: The articulation of the factual basis for a sentence is the goal of Art. 894.1, not rigid or mechanical compliance with its provisions.
  • State v. Jones 76 So. 3d 608 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
  • State v. McElveen 73 So. 3d 1033 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    4 Cir. 3/4/98), : The articulation of the factual basis for a sentence is the goal of Art. 894.1, not rigid or mechanical compliance with its provisions.
  • State v. Martin 72 So. 3d 928 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    4 Cir. 3/4/98) , , this court stated: The articulation of the factual basis for a sentence is the goal of Art. 894.1, not rigid or mechanical compliance with its provisions.
  • State v. Scoggins 70 So. 3d 145 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    4 Cir. 3/4/98), , 819 this Court stated: The articulation of the factual basis for a sentence is the goal of Art. 894.1, not rigid or mechanical compliance with its provisions.
  • State v. Wells 64 So. 3d 303 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    4 Cir. 3/4/98), : The articulation of the factual basis for a sentence is the goal of Art. 894.1, not rigid or mechanical compliance with its provisions.
  • State v. Stanfield 56 So. 3d 428 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    4 Cir. 3/4/98), , 819 this court stated: The articulation of the factual basis for a sentence is the goal of Art. 894.1, not rigid or mechanical compliance with its provisions.
  • State v. Mueller 53 So. 3d 677 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
  • State v. Monroe 53 So. 3d 626 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    4 Cir. 3/4/98), : The articulation of the factual basis for a sentence is the goal of Art. 894.1, not rigid or mechanical compliance with its provisions.
  • State v. Summers 52 So. 3d 951 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
  • State of Louisiana v. Michael W. Hood La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
    4th Cir.3/4/98), -819, writ denied, 98-2171 (La.1/15/99)
  • State v. Fernandez 50 So. 3d 219 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    4 Cir. 3/4/98), : The articulation of the factual basis for a sentence is the goal of Art. 894.1, not rigid or mechanical compliance with its provisions.
  • State v. Jenkins 45 So. 3d 173 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    4 Cir. 3/4/98), : The articulation of the factual basis for a sentence is the goal of Art. 894.1, not rigid or mechanical compliance with its provisions.
  • State v. Johnson 41 So. 3d 1188 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010