DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Jyles, 704 So. 2d 241.

637 citing documents.

  • State v. Gayden 168 So. 3d 766 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    1396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967) and State v. Jyles, 96-2669 (La.12/12/97), (per curiam).
  • State v. Gayton 158 So. 3d 955 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    See also State v. Jyles, 96-2669, p. 2 (La.12/12/97); (per cu-riam) (punctuation omitted).
  • State v. Aguilar 167 So. 3d 862 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    1396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967) and State v. Jyles, 96-2669 (La.12/12/97), (per curiam), appointed counsel requests permission to withdraw as counsel of record.
  • State v. Britton 167 So. 3d 843 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    1396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and State v. Jyles, *845 96-2669 (La.12/12/97), (per curiam), appointed |sappellate counsel requests permission to withdraw as counsel of record for defendant.
  • State v. Reed 167 So. 3d 857 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    1396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967) and State v. Jyles, 96-2669 (La.12/12/97), (per curiam), asserting that she has thoroughly reviewed the trial court record and could find no non-frivolous issues to raise on appeal.
  • State v. Crawford 166 So. 3d 1009 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    1396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967) and State v. Jyles, 96-2669 (La.12/12/97), (per curiam), asserting that he has thoroughly reviewed the trial court record and could find no non-frivolous issues to raise on appeal.
  • State v. Morton 167 So. 3d 52 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    1396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and State v. Jyles, 96-2669 (La.12/12/97), (per curiam), which set forth the procedure appellate counsel should follow when, upon conscientious review of a case, counsel finds an appeal would be wholly frivolous.
  • State v. Chandler 167 So. 3d 76 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    1396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and State v. Jyles, 96-2669 (La.12/12/97); (per curiam), which set forth the procedure appellate counsel should follow when, upon conscientious review of a case, counsel finds an appeal would be wholly frivolous.
  • State v. Alexis 157 So. 3d 775 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    Counsel filed a brief complying with State v. Jyles, 96-2669 (La.12/12/97), .
  • State v. Oliver 165 So. 3d 970 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    1396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and State v. Jyles, 96-2669 (La.12/12/97), (per curiam), appointed counsel requests permission to withdraw as counsel of record.
  • State v. LeBlanc 165 So. 3d 1022 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    1396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and State v. Jyles, 96-2669 (La.12/12/97); (per curiam)-, which set forth the procedure appellate counsel should follow when, upon conscientious review ,of a case, counsel finds an appeal would be wholly frivolous.
  • State of Louisiana v. Kerry M. Guinn La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
    12/12/97), (citing Jones v. Barnes, 463 U.S. 745, 103 S.Ct.
  • State v. Guinn 159 So. 3d 1073 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2014
    While it is not necessary for Defendant’s counsel to “catalog tediously every merit-less objection made at trial or by way of pre-trial motions with a labored explanation of why the objections all lack merit[,]” counsel’s Anders brief must “ ‘assure the court that the indigent defendant’s constitutional rights have not been violated.’ ” State v. Jyles, 96-2669, p. 2 (La.12/12/97), (citing Jones v. Barnes, 463 U.S. 745 , 103 S.Ct.
  • State v. Jaufre 164 So. 3d 888 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2014
    ASSIGNMENTS OF ERROR 2 On appeal, Defendant seeks review of his conviction and sentence in conformity with the procedures outlined in State v. Jyles, 96-2669 (La.12/12/97); (per curiam).
  • State v. Fontenette 164 So. 3d 880 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2014
    1396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967) and State v. Jyles, 96-2669 (La.12/12/97); (per curiam).
  • State v. Earwood 164 So. 3d 883 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    1396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967) and State v. Jyles, 96-2669 (La.12/12/97), (per curiam), appointed counsel requests permission to withdraw as counsel of record.
  • State of Louisiana v. Terrance Wayne Anderson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
  • State of Louisiana v. Terrance Anderson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
  • State of Louisiana v. Terrance Wayne Anderson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
  • State of Louisiana v. Terrance Wayne Anderson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
  • State of Louisiana v. Terrance Anderson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
  • State v. Reynolds 149 So. 3d 471 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
    See Anders, supra; State v. Jyles, 96-2669 (La.12/12/97), ; State v. Mouton, 95-0981 (La.04/28/95), ; (La.App.
  • State of Louisiana v. Robert N. Johnson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
    12/12/97), (citing Jones v. Barnes, 463 U.S. 745, 103 S.Ct.
  • State v. Clark 149 So. 3d 443 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    1396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967); State v. Jyles, 96-2669 (La.12/12/97), ; State v. Mouton, 95-0981 (La.04/28/95), ; (La.App.
  • State v. Brooks 150 So. 3d 913 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    Counsel filed a brief complying with State v. Jyles, 96-2669 (La.12/12/97), .
  • State v. Finley 146 So. 3d 962 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
    See Anders v. California, supra; State v. Jyles, 96-2669 (La.12/12/97), ; State v. Mouton, 95-0981 (La.04/28/95), ; and, (La.App.
  • State v. Stockman 147 So. 3d 263 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    1396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967) and State v. Jyles, 96-2669 (La.12/12/97), (per curiam), appointed counsel requests permission to withdraw as counsel of record.
  • State of Louisiana v. Chad Michael Mouton La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
    12/12/97), (citing Jones v. Barnes, 463 U.S. 745, 103 S.Ct.
  • State v. Mendez 140 So. 3d 284 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    12/12/97), ; State v. Mouton, 95-0981 (La.4/28/95), ; (La.App.
  • State v. Hoppens 140 So. 3d 293 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    1396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967) and State v. Jyles, 96-2669 (La.12/12/97), (per curiam), appointed counsel requests permission to withdraw as counsel of record.
  • State v. Coleman 137 So. 3d 149 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
    Anders v. California, supra; State v. Jyles, 96-2669 (La.12/12/97), ; State v. Mouton, 95-0981 (La.4/28/95)
  • State v. Goff 140 So. 3d 146 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    1396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967) and State v. Jyles, 96-2669 (La.12/12/97), (per curiam), asserting that she has thoroughly reviewed the trial court record and could find no non-frivolous issues to raise on appeal.
  • State of Louisiana v. Cornelius Eugene Wilson AKA N.O. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
  • State v. Stanfield 137 So. 3d 788 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    1396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967) and State v. Jyles, 96-2669 (La.12/12/97), , we grant the motion to withdraw.
  • State v. Wilson 135 So. 3d 842 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    explanation of why the objections all lack merit[,]” it “must preview not only the procedural history of the case and the evidence presented at trial but must also provide, as did the advocate’s brief in Mouton , ‘a detailed and reviewable assessment for both the defendant and the appellate court of whether the appeal is worth pursuing in the first place.’ ” State v. Jyles, 96-2669 (La.12/12/97), -42 .
  • State v. Gros 138 So. 3d 763 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    Accordingly, pursuant to Anders v. California, supra, and State v. Jyles, 96-2669 (La.12/12/97), (per curiam), appointed counsel requests permission to withdraw as counsel of record.
  • State v. Frazier 134 So. 3d 1255 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
    See Anders v. California, supra; State v. Jyles, 1996-2669 (La.12/12/97), ; State v. Mouton, 1995-0981 (La.04/28/95), ; (La.App.
  • State v. Griffin 136 So. 3d 379 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    1396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967) and State v. Jyles, 96-2669 (La.12/12/97), (per curiam), asserting that she has thoroughly reviewed the trial court record and cannot find any non-frivolous issues to raise on appeal.
  • State v. Banks 136 So. 3d 937 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
    Anders v. State, supra; State v. Jyles, 96-2669 (La.12/12/97), ; State v. Mouton, 95-0981 (La.4/28/95), ; State v. Benjamin, supra.
  • State v. Williams 135 So. 3d 789 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
    1396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967); State v. Jyles, 96-2669 (La.12/12/97), ; State v. Mouton, 95-0981 (La.4/28/95), ; (La.App.
  • State of Louisiana v. Wesley James Monroe La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
    12/12/97), (quoting McCoy v. Court of Appeals of Wisconsin, 486 U.S. 429, 439, 108 S.Ct.
  • State of Louisiana v. Ronald Millard Irby La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
  • State of Louisiana v. Wesley James Monroe La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
    12/12/97), (quoting McCoy v. Court of Appeals of Wisconsin, 486 U.S. 429, 439, 108 S.Ct.
  • State v. Stewart 134 So. 3d 636 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    1396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967) and State v. Jyles, 96-2669 (La.12/12/97), (per curiam), asserting that he has thoroughly reviewed the trial court record and cannot find any non-frivolous issues to raise on appeal.
  • State v. Cox 134 So. 3d 68 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    12/12/97), (per curiam ).
  • State v. Cox 134 So. 3d 74 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    12/12/97); ; State v. Mouton, 95-981 (La.4/28/95); ; (La.App.
  • State v. Rivera 134 So. 3d 61 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    1396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967) and State v. Jyles, 96-2669 (La.12/12/97), (per curiam), asserting that he has thoroughly reviewed the trial court record and cannot find any non-frivolous issues to raise on appeal.
  • State v. Siggio 134 So. 3d 13 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    The Louisiana Supreme Court approved this procedure in State v. Jyles, 96-2669 (La.12/12/97), .
  • State v. Lecour 133 So. 3d 32 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    Counsel filed a brief complying with State v. Jyles, 96-2669 (La.12/12/97), .
  • State v. Ricks 131 So. 3d 1117 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    1396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967) and State v. Jyles, 96-2669 (La.12/12/97), (per curiam), asserting that she has thoroughly reviewed the trial court record and cannot find any non-frivolous issues to raise on appeal.