DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Jyles, 704 So. 2d 241.

637 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana in the Interest of I. G. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
    12/12/97), (per curiam), (La.App.
  • State of Louisiana v. Therand Guy Thacker La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
    12/12/97), (quoting McCoy v. Court of Appeals of Wisconsin, 486 U.S. 429, 442, 108 S.Ct.
  • State v. Thacker 187 So. 3d 552 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
    Counsel’s Anders brief must “ ‘assure the court that the indigent defendant’s constitutional rights have not been violated.’” State v. Jyles, 96-2669, p. 2 (La.12/12/97), (quoting McCoy v. Court of Appeals of Wisconsin, 486 U.S. 429, 442 , 108 S.Ct.
  • State of Louisiana v. Jamarlon W. Pierre La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
    12/12/97), (quoting McCoy v. Court of Appeals of Wisconsin, 486 U.S. 429, 442, 108 S.Ct.
  • State v. Pierre 186 So. 3d 361 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
    Defendant’s appellate counsel’s Anders brief must “,‘assure the court that the indigent defendant’s constitutional rights have not been violated.’ ” State v. Jyles, 96-2669, p. 2 (La.12/12/97), (quoting McCoy v. Court of Appeals of Wisconsin, 486 U.S. 429, 442 , 108 S.Ct.
  • State v. Gipson 189 So. 3d 1147 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
    See Anders v. California, supra; State v, Jyles, 96-2669 (La.12/12/97), ; State v. Mou *1149 ton, 95-0981 (La.4/28/95), ; (La.App.
  • State v. Hall 184 So. 3d 1290 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
    1396 , 18 *1291 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and State v. Jyles, 96-2669 (La.12/12/97); (per curiam ), which set forth the procedure appellate counsel should follow when, upon conscientious review of a case, counsel finds an appeal would be wholly frivolous.
  • State v. Robinson 185 So. 3d 212 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
    1396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and State v. Jyles, 96-2669 (La.12/12/97), (per curiam), which set forth the procedure appellate counsel should follow when, upon conscientious review of a case, counsel finds an appeal would be wholly frivolous.
  • State v. Smith 186 So. 3d 794 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
    4 See also State v. Jyles, 96-2669, p. 3 (La.12/12/97), (recognizing the Louisiana Supreme Court’s general endorsement of the rule).
  • State v. Faggard 184 So. 3d 837 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
    1396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967) and State v. Jyles, 96-2669 (La.12/12/97), (per curiam), appointed counsel requests permission to withdraw as counsel of record.
  • State v. Chess 184 So. 3d 833 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
    1396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967) and State v. Jyles, 96-2669 (La.12/12/97), (per curiam), appointed counsel requests permission to withdraw' as counsel of record for defendant.
  • State v. Downs 186 So. 3d 207 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
    See also State v. Jyles, 1996-2669 (La.12/12/97), ; State v. Mouton, 1995-0981 (La.04/28/95), ; and, (La.App.
  • State v. Martin 182 So. 3d 1233 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    1396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967) and State v. Jyles, 96-2669 (La.12/12/97), (per Lcuriam), asserting that he has thoroughly reviewed the trial court record and could find no non-frivolous issues to raise on appeal.
  • State v. Ussin 182 So. 3d 1226 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2015
    I ¿ASSIGNMENTS OF ERROR On appeal, Defendant’s counseled assignment of error seeks review of his conviction and sentence in conformity with the procedures outlined in State v. Jyles, 96-2669 (La.12/12/97); (per curiam).
  • State of Louisiana v. Andrew Schlesinger AKA - Andrew Devon Schlesinger La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
    12/12/97), (citing Jones v. Barnes, 463 U.S. 745, 103 S.Ct.
  • State v. Barnes 179 So. 3d 885 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    1396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967) and State v, Jyles, 96-2669 (La.12/12/97), (per curiam ).
  • State v. Barnes 179 So. 3d 874 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    After receiving appellate counsel’s brief and motion to withdraw, this - Court performed a full examination of the entire-appellate court record to determine whether this appeal is frivolous in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 , 87 S.Ct 1396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967) and State v. Jyles, 96-2669 (La.12/12/97), (per curiam), 4 Our independent review of the record in this case consisted of (1) a review of the bill of information to ensure that defendant was properly charged; (2) a r
  • State v. Williams 179 So. 3d 878 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2015
    ASSIGNMENT OF ERROR On appeal, Defendant seeks review of his convictions and sentences in conformity with the procedures outlined in State v. Jyles, 96-2669 (La.12/12/97); (per curiam).
  • State of Louisiana v. Cheryl A. Schonsby AKA Cheryl Anne Schonsby La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
    12/12/97), (citing Jones v. Barnes, 463 U.S. 745, 103 S.Ct.
  • State v. Kent 178 So. 3d 219 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    1396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and State v. Jyles, 96-2669 (La.12/12/97), (per curiam), appointed appellate counsel requests permission to withdraw as counsel of record for defendant.
  • State of Louisiana v. Nathaniel Wayne Carmouche La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
    12/12/97), (citing Jones v. Barnes, 463 U.S. 745, 103 S.Ct.
  • State of Louisiana v. Michael Lee Jones La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
    12/12/97), (citations omitted).
  • State of Louisiana v. Chad Perkins La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
    12/12/97), (citing Jones v. Barnes, 463 U.S. 745, 103 S.Ct.
  • State v. Warren 181 So. 3d 166 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
    1396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967); State v. Jyles, 96-2669 (La.12/12/97), ; State v. Mouton, 95-0981 (La.4/28/95), ; (La.App.
  • State v. Thompson 178 So. 3d 1058 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
    Further, counsel verifies by certificates of service that he mailed copies of the motion to withdraw and appellate brief to Thompson, in accordance with Anders, supra; Mouton, supra; and, State v. Jyles, 1996-2669 (La.12/12/97), .
  • State v. Woods 176 So. 3d 672 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    1396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967) and State v. Jyles, 96-2669 (La.12/12/97), (per curiam), appointed counsel requests permission to withdraw as counsel of record for defendant.
  • State v. Rome 176 So. 3d 721 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2015
    ASSIGNMENTS OF ERROR ' On-appeal, Defendant'seeks review of his convictions and sentences in conformity with the- procedures outlined in State v. Jyles, 96-2669 (La.12/12/97); (per curiam).
  • State v. Boudreaux 171 So. 3d 1258 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    1396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967) and State v. Jyles, 96-2669 (La.12/12/97), (per curiam).
  • State v. Breaux 171 So. 3d 1234 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    1396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967) and State, v. Jyles, 96-2669 (La.12/12/97), (per curiam), appointed | ^appellate counsel requests permission to withdraw as counsel of record for defendant.
  • State v. Lee 171 So. 3d 1214 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    1396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967) and State v. Jyles, 96-2669 (La.12/12/97), (per curiam), asserting that he had thoroughly reviewed the trial court record and could find no non-frivolous issues to raise on appeal.
  • State v. Stuart 171 So. 3d 1230 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    1396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967) and State v. Jyles, 96-2669 (La.12/12/97), (per curiam), appointed counsel requests permission to withdraw as counsel of record for defendant.
  • State of Louisiana v. Maurice Joseph Goodman La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
    12/12/97), (citing Jones v. Barnes, 463 U.S. 745, 103 S.Ct.
  • State v. Goodman 165 So. 3d 1285 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    While it is not necessary for Defendant’s appellate counsel to “catalog tediously every meritless objection made at trial or by way of pre-trial motions |swith a labored explanation of why the objections all lack merit[,]” counsel’s Anders brief must “ ‘assure the court that the indigent defendant’s constitutional rights have not been violated.’ ” State v. Jyles, 96-2669, p. 2 (La.12/12/97), (citing Jones v. Barnes, 463 U.S. 745 , 103 S.Ct.
  • State v. Kirk 166 So. 3d 392 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
    See Anders v. California, supra; State v. Jyles, 96-2669 (La.12/12/97), ; State v. Mouton, 95-0981 (La.4/28/95), ; (La.App.
  • State v. Augustine 170 So. 3d 1123 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    1396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967) and State v. Jyles, 96-2669 (La.12/12/97), (per curiara), asserting that she has thoroughly reviewed the trial court record and could find no non-frivolous issues to raise on appeal.
  • State of Louisiana v. Jevante Jamal Biron La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
    12/12/97), (citing Jones v. Barnes, 463 U.S. 745, 103 S.Ct.
  • State of Louisiana v. Jamarlon W. Pierre La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
    12/12/97), (quoting McCoy v. Court of Appeals of Wisconsin, Dist.
  • State v. Pierre 165 So. 3d 365 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    An Anders brief must “ ‘assure the court that the indigent defendant’s constitutional rights have not been violated.’ ” State v. Jyles, 96-2669, p. 2 (La.12/12/97), (quoting McCoy v. Court of Appeals of Wisconsin, Dist.
  • State v. Wilt 170 So. 3d 317 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    Pursuant to Anders, supra and State v. Jyles, 96-2669 (La.12/12/97), (per curiam), appointed counsel has also filed a motion to withdraw as counsel of record.
  • State v. Banks 163 So. 3d 895 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
    State v. Anders, supra; State v. Jyles, 96-2669 (La.12/12/97), ; State v. Mouton, 95-0981 (La.4/28/95), ; State v. Benjamin, supra.
  • State v. Jones 163 So. 3d 875 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
    1396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967); State v. Jyles, 96-2669 (La.12/12/97), ; State v. Mouton, 95-0981 (La.04/28/95), ; (La.App.
  • State v. Robinson 170 So. 3d 300 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2015
    1396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967) and State v. Jyles, 96-2669 (La.12/12/97), (per curiam), asserting that she has thoroughly reviewed the trial court record and cannot find any non-frivolous issues to raise on appeal.
  • State v. McKinney 169 So. 3d 679 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    1396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and State v. Jyles, 96-2669 (La.12/12/97); (per curiam), which set forth the procedure appellate counsel should follow when, upon conscientious review of a case, counsel finds an appeal would be wholly frivolous.
  • State v. Poree 166 So. 3d 372 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    4th Cir.1990), and filed the defendant’s brief pursuant to State v. Jyles, 96-2669 (La.12/12/97), .
  • State of Louisiana v. Richard Bamburg La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
  • State v. Collins 159 So. 3d 1040 La. 2015
    1396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), according to the procedures set forth in State v. Jyles, 96-2669 (La.12/12/97), , the court of appeal properly conducted an independent review of the record but erred in sua sponte raising questions about defendant’s understanding of the sentencing consequences when he entered his guilty pleas in the absence of any specific complaint in that regard by defendant in his pro se brief, which assigned
  • State v. Wesley 215 So. 3d 344 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
    State v. Jyles, 96-2669 (La.12/12/97), .
  • State v. Respert 168 So. 3d 839 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    1396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and State v. Jyles, 96-2669 (La.12/12/97), (per curiam), asserting that she has found no non-frivolous issues to raise on appeal.
  • State v. Landry 168 So. 3d 836 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    Moreover, in State v. Jyles, 96-2669 (La.12/12/97), (per curiam), the Louisiana Supreme Court explained that an Anders brief must demonstrate by full discussion and analysis that appellate | ¿counsel “has cast an advocate’s eye over the trial record and considered whether any ruling made by the trial court, subject to the contemporaneous objection rule, had a significa
  • State v. Alfaro 168 So. 3d 761 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    1396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967) and State v. Jyles, 96-2669 (La.12/12/97), (per curiam), appointed counsel requests permission to withdraw as counsel of record.