Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Reed v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 708 So. 2d 362.

177 citing documents.

Susan Robinson and Douglass Robinson, III v. Pointe Coupee Parish School Board and Louisiana Claims Administrator (LoCa) La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2024
Deanna Smith v. State of La., Dotd La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
4/5/13), -84 (footnote omitted), the supreme court further explained: the question of whether a defect presents an unreasonable risk of harm [is] “a disputed issue of mixed fact and law or policy that is peculiarly a question for the jury or trier of the facts.” Reed v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 97-1174, p. 4 (La.3/4/98), ( (per curiam)).
Oris Latour And Virgie Latour v. Steamboats, Llc La. 2023
Gerry Sexton v. Travelers Indemnity Company of Connecticut La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
Reed v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 97-1174 (La.3/4/98)
Evelyn Burlison v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
9 We have described the question of whether a defect presents an unreasonable risk of harm as “a disputed issue of mixed fact and law or policy that is peculiarly a question for the jury or trier of the facts.” Reed v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 97-1174, p. 4 (La.3/4/98), ( (per curiam)).
Oris Latour, Ind. and Virgie Latour, Ind. v. Steamboat's, LLC La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
Rose George and Melvin George v. Abc Insurance Company and Southern University of New Orleans La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2022
The Court stated, in pertinent part: We have described the question of whether a defect presents an unreasonable risk of harm as “a disputed issue of mixed fact and law or policy that is peculiarly a question for the jury or trier of the facts.” Reed v. Wal–Mart Stores, Inc., [19]97–1174, p. 4 (La.3/4/98), ( (per curiam)).
Raihana Islam and Mohammed Islam Versus Walmart, Inc. D/B/A Walmart Neighborhood Market - Kenner and Wal-Mart Louisiana, L.L.C. … La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2022
CD Individually and as Tutor of His Minor Child SD v. SC, Individually and as the Parent and … La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2022
Crystal Bell o/b/o D'Arbri Cox v. Big Star of Tallulah, Inc. and Amtrust North America, Inc. La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2021
Judith Prince Versus Rouse's Enterprises, L.L.C. D/B/A Rouses Markets La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2020
Mary L. Sepulvado v. Farm Bureau Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
Daniel Norman v. Michael A. Shelton Enterprise, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
Demetric Tanner v. Lafayette City-Parish Consolidated Government La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
4/10/15), 3 We have described the question of whether a defect presents an unreasonable risk of harm as “a disputed issue of mixed fact and law or policy that is peculiarly a question for the jury or trier of the facts.” Reed v. Wal–Mart Stores, Inc., 97–1174, p. 4 (La.3/4/98), ( (per curiam)).
Tanner v. Lafayette City-Parish Consol. Gov't 273 So. 3d 382 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
3/4/98), , 364 ( (per curiam)).
Grossie v. MGM Props., Inc. 269 So. 3d 921 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
3/4/98), ; Johnson, supra .
Crystal Grossie v. Mgm Properties, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
Reed v. Wal–Mart Stores, Inc., 97–1174 (La.03/04/98), Johnson, supra.
Johnson v. State Through Department of Transportation and Development 275 So. 3d 879 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
Vernon Martin v. City of Crowley La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
Pryor v. Iberia Parish School Bd., 10-1683 (La.3/15/11), (citing Reed v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 97-1174 (La.3/4/98), Boyle v. Board of Sup’rs, Louisiana State University, 96- 1158 (La.1/14/97), ).
Martin v. City of Crowley 269 So. 3d 1105 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
3/4/98), , 365 ; Boyle v. Board of Sup'rs, Louisiana State University , 96-1158 (La.
Judy Clark v. Circle K Stores, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
Clark v. Circle K Stores, Inc. 264 So. 3d 1250 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
Degree v. Galliano Truck Plaza, LLP 271 So. 3d 315 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
Taylor v. Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. 263 So. 3d 910 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Riley Leblanc v. City of Abbeville La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
LeBlanc v. City of Abbeville 259 So. 3d 372 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Cangelosi v. Treasure Chest Casino, L.L.C. 252 So. 3d 559 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
3/4/98), , 364 (quoting Tillman v. Johnson , (La.
Murphy v. Savannah 246 So. 3d 785 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2018
3/4/98), , 364 (quoting Tillman v. Johnson , (per curiam) ).
Williams v. Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Co. 217 So. 3d 421 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
Cheramie v. Port Fourchon Marina, Inc. 211 So. 3d 1212 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
Fletcher v. Anco Insulations, Inc. 208 So. 3d 467 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
3/4/98), ; Kirkland Riverwood International USA, Inc., infra.
Melancon v. Perkins Rowe Associates, LLC 208 So. 3d 925 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Tomlinson v. Landmark American Insurance Co. 192 So. 3d 153 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Reed v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 97-1174 (La.3/4/98); ; Ruffino v. Allstate Ins.
Moore v. Murphy Oil USA, Inc. 186 So. 3d 135 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Reed v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 97-1174 (La.3/4/98), .
Ton v. Albertson's, LLC 182 So. 3d 246 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
As stated in Reed v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 97-1174 (La.3/4/98), , 363: It is common for the surfaces of streets, sidewalks, and parking lots to be irregular.
Waddles v. Brookshire Grocery Co. 181 So. 3d 772 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
Reed v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 97-1174 (La.3/4/98), .
Hooper v. Brown 171 So. 3d 995 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
The Supreme Court has described this question as “a disputed issue of mixed fact and law or policy that is peculiarly a question for the jury or trier of the facts.” Reed v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 97-1174, p. 4 (La.3/4/98), .
Guerrero v. Brookshire Grocery Co. 165 So. 3d 1092 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
Russell, supra; Reed v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 97-1174 (La.3/4/98), ; Dowdy v. City of Monroe, 46,693 (La.App.2d Cir.11/2/11), .
Kelli Fuselier v. City of Oakdale La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
Fuselier v. City of Oakdale 130 So. 3d 984 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Reed v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 97-1174 (La.3/4/98), .
Graupmann v. Nunamaker Family Ltd. Partnership 136 So. 3d 863 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
The Louisiana Supreme Court has described the question of whether a defect presents an unreasonable risk of harm as “a disputed issue of mixed fact and law or policy that is peculiarly a question for the jury or trier of the facts.” Broussard, 113 So.3d at 183 , citing Reed v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 97-1174 (La.3/4/98), .
Primrose v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 127 So. 3d 13 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
Reed v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 97-1174 (La.3/4/98), ; Russell Morgan’s Bestway of La., L.L.C., 47,914 (La.App.2d Cir.4/10/13), .
Russell v. Morgan's Bestway of Louisiana, LLC 113 So. 3d 448 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
Reed v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 97-1174 (La.3/4/98), ; Dowdy, supra.
Broussard v. State ex rel. Office of State Buildings 113 So. 3d 175 La. 2013
We have described the question of whether a defect presents an unreasonable risk of harm as “a disputed issue of mixed fact and law or policy that is peculiarly a question for the jury or trier of the facts.” Reed v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 97-1174, p. 4 (La.3/4/98), ( (per curiam)).
Marie Benniefiel v. Zurich American Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
Reed v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 97-1174 (La.3/4/98), Lawrence, supra; Reitzell, supra.
Benniefiel v. Stine, L.L.C. 112 So. 3d 997 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Reed v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 97-1174 (La.3/4/98), ; Lawrence, supra; Reitzell, supra.
Scherer v. PNK (Bossier City), Inc. 112 So. 3d 931 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
Reed v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 97-1174 (La.3/4/98), ; Dowdy, supra.
Mahoney v. East Carroll Parish Police Jury 105 So. 3d 144 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
Reed v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 97-1174 (La.3/4/98), .
Wynn v. Luck 106 So. 3d 111 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
Johnson, supra; Reed v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 1997-1174 (La.3/4/98), .
Dickson v. City of Shreveport 104 So. 3d 9 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
Id.; Reed v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 97-1174 (La.3/4/98), ; Boyle v. Board of Supervisors, Louisiana State University, 96-1158 (La.1/14/97), .