DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Reed v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 708 So. 2d 362.

177 citing documents.

  • Marange v. Custom Metal Fabricators, Inc. 93 So. 3d 1253 La. 2012
    See, e.g., Richard v. Richard, 11-0229 (La.10/25/11), ; London Towne Condominium Ass’n v. London Towne Co., 06-401 (La.10/17/06), ; Bonnette v. Conoco, Inc., 01-2767 (La.1/28/03), ; Batson v. South Louisiana Medical Center, 99-0232 (La.11/19/99), ; Reed v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 97-1174 (La.3/4/98), ; Stobart v. State, Through Department of Transportation and Development, Sevier v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co., *1259 West v. Bayou Vista Manor, Inc., Arceneaux v. Domingue, 365 So.
  • Handy v. City of Kenner 97 So. 3d 539 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    Reed v. Wal-Mart, Inc., 97-1174 (La.3/4/98), .
  • Johnson v. Super 8 Lodge-Shreveport 92 So. 3d 519 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
    Reed v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 1997-1174 (La.3/4/98), .
  • Porter v. Fulkerson 93 So. 3d 642 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    Reed v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 97-1174 (La.3/4/98); .
  • Franatovich v. St. Bernard Parish Government 88 So. 3d 1169 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    Reed v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 97-1174 (La.3/4/98), .
  • Cline v. Cheema 85 So. 3d 260 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    Stated more simply, the trier of fact “must decide whether the social value and utility of the hazard outweigh, and thus justify, its potential harm to others?” Reed v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 97-1174, p. 5 (La.3/4/98), .
  • Chambers v. Village of Moreauville 85 So. 3d 593 La. 2012
    Pryor v. Iberia Parish School Bd., 10-1683 (La.3/15/11), (citing Reed v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 97- *598 1174 (La.3/4/98), ; Boyle v. Board of Sup’rs, Louisiana State University, 96-1158 (La.1/14/97), ).
  • Regina Llorence v. Broadmoor Shopping Center, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
  • Llorence v. Broadmoor Shopping Center, Inc. 76 So. 3d 134 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    The supreme court addressed whether variations in the surface of parking lots, sidewalks, and the like constitute an unreasonable risk of harm in Reed v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 97-1174 (La.3/4/98), .
  • Brooks v. State Ex Rel. Department of Transportation & Development 74 So. 3d 187 La. 2011
    Reed v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 97-1174 (La.3/4/98), .
  • Jimenez v. OMNI ROYAL ORLEANS HOTEL 66 So. 3d 528 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    See also Reed v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 97-1174, p. 5 (La.3/4/98), (“The trial court’s finding of whether a defect creates *533 an unreasonable risk of harm is subject to a manifest error standard of review.”) A factual finding that the uncovered manhole is open and obvious leads the fact-finder to an evaluation of whether an open and obvious uncovered manhole presents an unreas
  • Arlene Chambers v. Village of Moreauville La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
  • Chambers v. Village of Moreauville 60 So. 3d 125 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    Reed v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 97-1174 (La.3/4/98), .
  • Williams v. Ruben Residential Properties, LLC 58 So. 3d 534 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
    Boyle v. Board of Supervisors, 96-1158 (La.1/14/97), ; Reed v. Wal-Mart Stores, 97-1174 (La.3/4/98), .
  • Burns v. CLK Investments V, L.L.C. 45 So. 3d 1152 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    First, over a timely objection, the trial judge instructed the jury with language from the Louisiana Supreme Court’s holding in Reed v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 97-1174, p. 2 (La.3/4/98), .
  • Schysm v. Boyd 47 So. 3d 977 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
    Reed v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 1997-1174 (La.3/4/98), .
  • Jeanine P. Pryor v. Iberia Parish School Board La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
  • Pryor v. Iberia Parish School Board 42 So. 3d 1015 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    “In determining whether a defect presents an unreasonable risk of harm, the trier of fact must balance the gravity and risk of harm against the individual and societal rights and obligations, the social utility, and the cost and feasibility of repair.” Reed v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 97-1174, p. 5 (La.3/4/98), .
  • LeBlanc v. Bossier Parish School Board 37 So. 3d 591 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
    Reed v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 97-1174 (La.03/04/98), .
  • Beckham v. Jungle Gym, L.L.C. 37 So. 3d 564 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
    Reed v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 97-1174 (La.3/4/98), .
  • Kaplon v. RIMKUS CONSULTING GROUP, INC. 39 So. 3d 725 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    See Reed v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 97-1174 (La.3/4/98), (holding the manifest error standard of review is the proper standard to be applied to the mixed question of law and fact *734 presented by a determination of whether a defect presents an unreasonable risk of harm).
  • Scott Ferguson v. Loewer Powersports & Equipment La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
    Reed v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 97-1174 (La.3/4/98)
  • Ferguson v. LOEWER POWERSPORTS & EQUIPMENT 33 So. 3d 446 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    Reed v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 97-1174 (La.3/4/98), .
  • Vanna Darlene McManus, Etc. v. State of La., Dept. of Wildlife and Fisheries La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
  • McManus v. State, Dept. of Wildlife & Fisheries 33 So. 3d 412 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    Reed v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 97-1174 (La.3/4/98), .
  • Williams Ex Rel. Williams v. Jones 34 So. 3d 926 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    Reed v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 97-1174, p. 5 (La.3/4/98), .
  • Adonis Cole Weeks v. Sunstream, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
  • DOMINIO v. Folger Coffee Co. 32 So. 3d 955 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    4 In Reed v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 97-1174 (La.3/4/98), , the Louisiana Supreme Court held that the manifest error standard of review is the proper standard to be applied to the mixed question of law and fact presented by a determination of whether a defect presents an unreasonable risk of harm.
  • Weeks v. SUNSTREAM, INC. 30 So. 3d 1163 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    Reed v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 97-1174 (La.3/4/98), .
  • Wallace v. Howell 30 So. 3d 217 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    Similarly, “[t]he trial court’s finding of whether a defect creates an unreasonable risk of harm is subject to a manifest error standard of review.” Ambrose, supra; Reed v. *220 Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 97-1174, p. 5 (La.3/4/98), .
  • MILLIEN v. Jackson 30 So. 3d 167 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    Reed v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 97-1174, p. 5 (La.3/4/98), .
  • Washington v. Consolidated Water Works District No. 1 of the Parish of Jefferson 28 So. 3d 287 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2009
    Reed v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 97-1174, p. 5 (La.3/4/98), ; Joseph , 02-1996 at p. 4, 842 So.2d at 423 .
  • Williams v. Dutchtown Pharmacy, L.L.C. 24 So. 3d 221 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    See Reed v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 97-1174, pp. 3-5 (La.3/4/98), , 364-5 and 1 Frank L. Maraist & Harry T. Lemmon, Louisiana Civil Law Treatise: Civil Procedure § 14.14 n. 13 (1999).
  • Watters v. Department of Social Services 15 So. 3d 1128 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    Reed v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 97-1174, pp. 3-5 (La.3/4/98), -65 .
  • Tonia Sellers, Etc. v. Rapides Parish School Board La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
    3/4/98), Russell v. Noullet, 98-816 (La.
  • T.S. v. Rapides Parish School Board 11 So. 3d 628 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    Reed v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 97-1174 (La.3/4/98), ; Russell v. Noullet, 98-816 (La.12/1/98), .
  • Greely v. OAG PROPERTIES, LLC 12 So. 3d 490 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
    Reed v. Walr-Mart Stores, Inc., 1997-1174 (La.3/4/98), ; Johnson v. City of Monroe, 38,388 (La.App.2d Cir.4/7/04), , writ denied, 2004-1130 (La.6/25/04), .
  • Moore v. Oak Meadows Apartments 997 So. 2d 594 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    Reed v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 97-1174 (La.03/04/98), ; Johnson, supra .
  • Barnett v. Saizon 994 So. 2d 668 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
    See Reed v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 97-1174, pp. 3-5 (La.3/4/98), , 364-5 and 1 Frank L. Maraist & Harry T. Lemmon, Louisiana Civil Law Treatise: Civil Procedure § 14.14 n. 13 (1999).
  • Godwin v. City of Alexandria 983 So. 2d 1031 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
  • Mary Godwin v. City of Alexandria La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
  • Crisler v. Paige One, Inc. 974 So. 2d 125 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    Reed v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 97-1174 (La.3/4/98), ; Lawrence, supra ; Reitzell, supra .
  • Ricks v. City of Shreveport 968 So. 2d 863 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
    The court then cited the balancing test of Reed v. Wal-Mart Stores Inc., 97-1174 (La.3/4/98), , and accepted Mr. Negrete's testimony that this repair would have been a simple maintenance item; ergo, the grate posed an unreasonable risk of harm.
  • Ruffino v. Allstate Insurance 968 So. 2d 729 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
    Reed v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 97-1174, p. 5, (La.3/4/98), .
  • Ambrose v. McLaney 959 So. 2d 529 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
    Reed v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 97,1174, p. 5 (La.3/4/98), .
  • Pena v. Delchamps, Inc. 960 So. 2d 988 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
    See Reed v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 97-1174, pp. 4-5 (La.3/4/98), -65 .
  • Lawrence v. City of Shreveport 948 So. 2d 1179 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
    Reed v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 97-1174 (La.3/4/98), ; Reitzell v. Pecanland Mall Assoc., Ltd., supra .
  • Hayes v. Allstate Insurance Co. 947 So. 2d 792 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
    Rolf, supra, quoting Reed v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 97-1174 (La.03/04/98), -65 .
  • Walter Randall v. the Rapides Foundation D/B/A Rapides Reg. Med. Center La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
  • Bullock v. the Rapides Foundation 941 So. 2d 170 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    Reed v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 97-1174 (La.3/4/98), .