Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite King v. Caddo Parish Com'n, 719 So. 2d 410.

42 citing documents.

Consolidated With 2025-C-00868 BEVERLY ALEXANDER; RISE ST. JAMES; INCLUSIVE LOUISIANA; AND MOUNT TRIUMPH BAPTIST CHURCH BY AND THROUGH … La. 2026
10/20/98), -18 (emphasis added; internal citations and quotations omitted).
Pilotland Neighborhood Association, Wayne Baquet, Ashley Caponegro, Rashad Meyers, Billie Castle Myers, and Iam Tucker v. the City … La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2026
2 Cir. 7/21/10), (first citing King v. Caddo Parish Com’n, 97-1873 (La.10/20/98), and then citing Prest v. Parish of Caddo, 41,039 (La.App.
Robert J. Wiener and Kristi Nicole Johnson v. The Tangipahoa Parish Council and The Tangipahoa Parish Planning Department La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2025
Lake Terrace Property Owners Association, Inc. v. the City of New Orleans, Board of Zoning Adjustments and Celso … La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2025
3000-3032 St. Claude Avenue, LLC v. the City of New Orleans and the New Orleans City Council La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2023
Gladstone Area Partnership, Inc., and Swan Apartments, L.L.C., and Ashley M. Atkins v. City of Shreveport, Lakeshore Liquore, … La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2022
10/20/98), Racetrac Petroleum Inc. v. City of Shreveport, 45,120 (La.
Vieux Carre Property Owners, Residents & Associates, Inc. v. the City of New Orleans, Through Its Board of … La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2022
Yolande Schexnayder & Son, Inc. Versus Parish of St. James La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2022
New Cingular Wireless, PCS, LLC v. City-Parish of East Baton Rouge La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2021
3000-3032 St. Claude Ave., LLC v. the City of New Orleans and the New Orleans City Council La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2021
King v. Caddo Parish Commission, 97– 1873 (La.10/20/98)
St. Martin Parish Government v. Bryan Champagne La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2020
Peter Truitt and Lynda Truitt v. The West Feliciana Parish Government, The West Feliciana Parish Council and The … La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2020
The Cuny Family, LLC Versus The Parish of Jefferson La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2019
Wood Materials LLC v. City of Harahan 262 So. 3d 1034 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Dupuis v. City of New Orleans ex rel. Zoning Board of Zoning Adjustments 224 So. 3d 1046 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
10/20/98), , “[a] reviewing court does not consider whether the district court manifestly erred in its findings, but whether the zoning board acted arbitrarily, capriciously or with any calculated or prejudicial lack of discretion.” This Court recently reiterated the role of the appellate court in reviewing a decision of a
Welch & Hoover v. Planning & Zoning Commission of East Baton Rouge Parish 220 So. 3d 70 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
Shaw v. Jefferson Parish 186 So. 3d 1181 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Jenniskens, supra; Palermo, supra; see also King v. Caddo Parish Com’n, 97-1873 (La.1998), ; Maynard Batture Venture v. Parish of Jefferson, 00-1669 (La.App.
Mannino's P & M Texaco Service Center, Inc. v. City of New Orleans 173 So. 3d 1186 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
King v. Caddo Parish Commission, 97-1873 (La.10/20/98), .
Vieux Carre Property Owners v. City of New Orleans 216 So. 3d 873 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
“The test of whether a zoning board’s action is arbitrary and capricious is whether the action is reasonable under the circumstances.” Esplanade Ridge, 13-1062, p. 4, 136 So.3d at 169 quoting King v. Caddo Parish Com’n, 97-1873, p. 14 (La.10/20/98), .
City of Baton Rouge/Parish of East Baton Rouge v. Myers 145 So. 3d 320 La. 2014
See also King v. Caddo Parish Commission, 97-1873 (La.10/20/98),6 .
Esplanade Ridge Civic Ass'n v. City of New Orleans 136 So. 3d 166 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
In King v. Caddo Parish Com’n, 14-15 (La.10/20/98), , the Court stated: The test of whether a zoning board’s action is arbitrary and capricious is whether the action is reasonable under the circumstances.
Our Lady of the Lake Roman Catholic Church, Mandeville v. City of Mandeville, Planning & Zoning Commission 147 So. 3d 186 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
33:106(D); King v. Caddo Parish Comm’n, 97-1873 (La.10/20/98), ; see also Jenkins, 736 So.2d at 1291 .
Zachary Housing Partners, L.L.C. v. City of Zachary 185 So. 3d 1 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
33:106(D); King v. Caddo Parish Comm’n, 97-1873 (La.10/20/98), .
Ellsworth v. City of New Orleans 120 So. 3d 897 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
The jurisprudence has long recognized that “ ‘expressions of opinion made by citizens to a legislative body serve as a manner by which the legislative body learns the will of the people and determines what | inbenefits the public good.’ ” Toups , 10-1559 at p. 5, 60 So.3d at 1218 (quoting King v. Caddo Parish Commission, 97-1873, p. 16 (La.10/20/98), ()).
MacRo Oil Company, Inc. v. City of Breaux Bridge La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
10/20/98), (quoting Papa v. City of Shreveport, 27,045, p. 4 (La.App.
Macro Oil Co. v. City of Breaux Bridge 109 So. 3d 956 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
An appellate court reviews a zoning board’s decision directly, and considers whether the board “acted arbitrarily, capriciously or with any calculated or prejudicial lack of discretion.” King v. Caddo Parish Comm’n, 97-1873, p. 15 (La.10/20/98), (quoting Papa v. City of Shreveport, 27,045, p. 4 (La.App.
Truett Irvin v. Natchitoches Parish Police Jury La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
10/20/98), (quoting Papa v. City of Shreveport, 27,045 (La.App.
Toups v. City of Shreveport 60 So. 3d 1215 La. 2011
King v. Caddo Parish Commission, 97-1873 (La.10/20/98), .
Racetrac Petroleum, Inc. v. City of Shreveport 44 So. 3d 800 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
King v. Caddo Parish Com’n, 1997-1873 (La.10/20/98), ; Prest v. Parish of Caddo, 41,039 (La.App.2d Cir.06/02/06), .
Toups v. City of Shreveport 37 So. 3d 406 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
King v. Caddo Parish Commission, 1997-1873 (La.10/20/98), ; Prest v. Parish of Caddo, 41,039 (La.App.2d Cir.6/2/06), .
Daigle v. Jefferson Parish Council 40 So. 3d 1063 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2010
King v. Caddo Parish Com’n, 97-1873, p. 14 (La.10/20/98), (citations omitted).
Cordes v. Board of Zoning Adjustments & Audubon, LLC 31 So. 3d 504 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
King v. Caddo Parish Commission, 97-1873 (La.1998), .
Urban Housing of America, Inc. v. City of Shreveport 26 So. 3d 226 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
The city responds that the district court properly followed controlling jurisprudence recognizing the council’s legislative discretion, as in King v. Caddo Parish Comm’n, 97-1873 (La.10/20/98), , and that the council properly exercised that discretion in accord with Prest v. Parish of Caddo, supra.
RESIDENTS OF HIGHLAND ROAD, LLC v. Parish of East Baton Rouge 15 So. 3d 384 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
D'Argent Properties, LLC v. City of Shreveport 15 So. 3d 334 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
Even so, the court found that the ultimate “legislative prerogative and decision-making authority” lay with the council, not the MPC, citing King v. Caddo Parish Comm’n, 97-1873 (La.10/20/98), .
Jenniskens v. Parish of Jefferson 940 So. 2d 209 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
King v. Caddo Parish Com'n, 97-1873 (La.1998), ; Maynard Batture Venture v. Parish of Jefferson, 00-1669 (La.App.
Prest v. Parish of Caddo 930 So. 2d 1207 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
King v. Caddo Parish Commission, 97-1873 (La.10/20/98), .
Hardman v. City of Shreveport 930 So. 2d 1157 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
1 Significantly, Hardman cites and contrasts two zoning cases in brief, Clark v. City of Shreveport, 26,638 (La.App.2d Cir.5/10/95), and King v. Caddo Parish Comm’n, 97-1873 (La.10/20/98), .
Dan Rhodes Enterprises, Inc. v. City of Lake Charles La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
DAN RHODES ENTER v. City of Lake Charles 857 So. 2d 1256 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
[4] King v. Caddo Parish Comm'n, 97-1873 (La.10/20/98); .
Samuel v. City of New Orleans Board of Zoning Adjustments 857 So. 2d 1075 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
See also, e.g., King v. Caddo Parish Commission, 97-1873 (La.10/20/98), ; French Quarter Citizens for Preservation of Residential Quality, Inc. v. New Orleans City Planning Commission, 99-2154 (La.App.
Church v. St. Charles Parish 767 So. 2d 913 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
King v. Caddo Parish Com’n, 97-1873 (La.1998), ; Palermo Land Co. v. Planning Com’n of Calcasieu Parish, State ex rel Civello v. City of New Orleans, 154 La.