Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Fisher, 720 So. 2d 1179.

112 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Christopher L. Jones La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2025
State of Louisiana v. Thomas Riles La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2022
9/9/98), the Louisiana Supreme Court recognized a useful three-tiered analysis of interactions between citizens and the police, which the court reiterated in State v. Hamilton, 09-2005 (La.
State of Louisiana Versus Jakorey Williams La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2020
9/9/98), (internal citations omitted).
State Of Louisiana v. Joshua Jamar Coleman La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2020
State of Louisiana v. Corey Stevenson La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2019
“The fundamental philosophy behind the probable cause requirement of the Fourth Amendment is that common rumor or report is not an adequate 5 basis for the arrest of a person.” Sylvester, [20]02–0743, p. 5; 834 So.2d at 1169 (citing State v. Fisher, 97–1133, p. 7 (La.9/9/98); ).
State of Louisiana v. Reginald Taral Warren La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
ission of the person arrested to the custody of the one arresting him.” As the supreme court has previously stated: An arrest is “the taking of one person into custody by another [through] actual restraint [that] may be imposed by force or may result from submission of the person arrested to the custody of one arresting him.” State v. Fisher, 97-1133 (La.9/9/98), La.
State v. Warren 239 So. 3d 960 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
State ex rel. W.B. 206 So. 3d 974 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
9/9/98), (noting that “[a] prime characteristic of any Fourth Amendment seizure of a person is whether, under the totality of the circumstances, a reasonable person would not consider himself or herself free to leave.”).
STATE OF LOUISIANA VERSUS READO NARGO A/K/A RENALDO NARGO La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
9/9/98), the supreme court explained: A trial judge’s ruling on a motion to suppress a confession is entitled to deference, but only if it is supported by the evidence.
State v. Nargo 193 So. 3d 1263 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
In State v. Fisher, 97-1133, p. 4 (La.9/9/98), , the supreme court explained: A trial judge’s ruling on a motion to suppress a confession is entitled to deference, but only if it is supported by the.
State of Louisiana v. Robert Glen Coleman 188 So. 3d 174 La. 2016
McMasters v. Department of Police 172 So. 3d 105 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
“The fundamental philosophy behind the probable cause requirement of the Fourth Amendment is that common rumor or report is not an adequate basis for the arrest of a person.” Sylvester , 02-0743, p. 5; 834 So.2d at 1169 (citing State v. Fisher, 97-1133, p. 7 (La.9/9/98); ).
State v. Gayton 156 So. 3d 738 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
“The fundamental philosophy behind the probable cause requirement of the Fourth Amendment is that common rumor or report is not an adequate basis for the arrest of a person.” Sylvester , 02-0743, p. 5; 834 So.2d at 1169 (citing State v. Fisher, 97-1133, p. 7 (La.9/9/98); ).
State v. Alberti 128 So. 3d 351 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
In State v. Fisher, 97-1133 (La.9/9/98), , the Louisiana Supreme Court recognized a three-tiered analysis of interactions between citizens and the police.
State v. Williams 128 So. 3d 359 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
In State v. Fisher, 97-1133 (La.9/9/98), , the Louisiana Supreme Court recognized a three-tiered analysis of interactions between citizens and the police.
State v. Barabin 124 So. 3d 1121 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
In State v. Fisher, 97-1133, pp. 4-6 (La.9/9/98), -83 , the Court described the three levels of interaction between the police and citizens and found that an investigatory stop is a lesser form of detention than that of an arrest.
State v. Ulmer 116 So. 3d 1004 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Fisher, 97-1133, pp. 4-5 (La.9/9/98), -83 .
State of Louisiana v. Jason Lamounte Morgan La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
4 Cir. 4/2/97), rev’d on other grounds and remanded, 97-1133 (La.9/9/98), ), this Court outlined the law pertaining to a criminal defendant’s right to cross-examination as follows: A criminal defendant’s right to cross-examination is a fundamental right guaranteed by the Sixth Amendment of the United States Constitution applicable to the st
State v. Reed 107 So. 3d 1262 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Fisher, 97-1133, p. 8 (La.9/9/98), ().
State v. Earls 106 So. 3d 1149 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2012
State v. Franklin, 03-287, 858 So.2d at 70 , citing, State v. Fisher, 97-1133 (La.9/9/98); .
State of Louisiana v. Michael Wayne Collins La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
State v. Collins 101 So. 3d 557 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State v. Fisher, 97-1133, pp. 4-5 (La.9/9/98), .
State v. Butler 101 So. 3d 121 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State v. Hamilton, 09-2205, p. 4 (La.5/11/10), ; State v. Fisher, 97-1133 (La.9/9/98), .
State v. Taylor 97 So. 3d 522 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State v. Fisher, 97-1133, p. 6 (La.9/9/98), .
State v. Lampton 95 So. 3d 1199 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
The Louisiana Supreme Court in State v. Fisher, 97-1133 (La.9/9/98), , citing United States v. Watson, 953 F.2d 895 (5th Cir.1992), stated, "mere communications between officers and citizens implicate no Fourth Amendment concerns where there is no coercion or detention.”
State v. Burney 92 So. 3d 1184 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
State v. Thompson, supra; State v. Fisher, 97-1133 (La.9/9/98), .
State of Louisiana v. Ricky J. Charpentier La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
State v. Charpentier 86 So. 3d 86 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Furthermore, “[s]tatements given during a period of illegal detention are inadmissible, even though voluntarily given, if they are the product of illegal detention and not the result of an independent act of free will.” State v. Fisher, 97-1133, p. 11 (La.9/9/98), .
State of Louisiana v. Brandon Dale Allen La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
State v. Allen 79 So. 3d 1220 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Fisher, 97-K-1133, p. 8 (La.9/9/98), .
State v. Jones 78 So. 3d 274 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Fisher, 97-1133 (La.9/9/98), .
State v. Simpson 77 So. 3d 445 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
The Louisiana Supreme Court has divided encounters between police and citizens into three “tiers.” State v. Fisher, 97-1133 (La.9/9/98), .
State v. Williams 74 So. 3d 1208 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Fisher, 97-1133 (La.9/9/98), (citing United States v. Watson, 953 F.2d 895 , 897 n. 1 (5th Cir.1992)).
State v. Sander 69 So. 3d 730 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Fisher, 97-1133, p. 8 (La.9/9/98)
State v. Kirton 66 So. 3d 431 La. 2011
"[M]ere communications between officers and citizens implicate no Fourth Amendment concerns where there is no coercion or detention.” State v. Fisher, 97-1133, pp. 4-5 (La.9/9/98), .
State v. Hamilton 36 So. 3d 209 La. 2010
State v. Fisher, 97-1133 (La.9/9/98), .
State v. Jones 33 So. 3d 306 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
State v. Fischer, 97-1133, p. 8 (La.9/9/98), .
State v. Butler 28 So. 3d 317 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
In State v. Fisher, 97-1133, pp. 4-5 (La.9/9/98), -83 , citing United States v. Watson, 953 F.2d 895 , 897 n. 1 (5th Cir.1992), cert.
State v. Rogers 19 So. 3d 487 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2009
5 Cir. 12/16/08) , (citing State v. Fisher, 97-1133, p. 11 (La.9/9/98), ).
State v. Ayo 7 So. 3d 85 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
State v. Fisher, 97-1133, p. 7 (La.9/9/98), .
State v. Holmes 10 So. 3d 274 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
State v. Fisher, 97-K-1133, p. 8 (La.9/9/98), .
State v. Thomas 8 So. 3d 80 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
In State v. Fisher, 97-1133 (La.9/9/98), -83 , citing United States v. Watson, 953 F.2d 895 , 897 n. 1 (5th Cir.1992), cert.
State v. Otero 3 So. 3d 34 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
State v. Fisher, 97-1133 (La.9/9/98), .
State v. Dave 994 So. 2d 50 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
State v. Fisher, 97-1133, p. 7 (La.9/9/98), .
State v. Neville 986 So. 2d 884 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
State v. Fischer, 97-1133, p. 8 (La.1998), ; State v. Flagg, 99-1004 (La.App.
State v. Taylor 962 So. 2d 480 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
See State v. Fisher, 97-1133 (La.9/9/98), ; State v. Handy, XXXX-XXXX (La.App.
State v. Kelley 934 So. 2d 51 La. 2006
State v. Fisher, 97-1133, pp. 4-5 (La.9/9/98), ("[M]ere communications between officers and citizens implicate no Fourth Amendment concerns where there is no coercion or detention.") (citations omitted).
State v. Parker 931 So. 2d 353 La. 2006
State v. Fisher, 97-1133, pp. 4-5 (La.9/9/98), , (citing United States v. Watson, 953 F.2d 895, 897, n. 1 (5th Cir.1992), cert.
State v. Cooper 935 So. 2d 194 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
State v. Fisher, 97-1133, pp. 4-5 (La.9/9/98), -83 .
State v. Sherman 931 So. 2d 286 La. 2006
State v. Fisher, 97-1133, pp. 4-5 (La.9/9/98), , (citing United States v. Watson, 953 F.2d 895 , 897 n. 1 (5th Cir.1992), cert.