Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Johnson, 709 So. 2d 672.
-
State v. Adams
884 So. 2d 694
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
State v. Johnson, 97-1906, p. 8 (La.3/4/98), ( quoting from Judge Plotkin's concurrence in State v. Young, 94-1636, pp. 5-6 (La.
-
State of Louisiana v. Corey Marquee Adams, Whitney Batiste, and Horatio Adams
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
3/4/98), (quoting from Judge Plotkin’s concurrence in State v. Young, 94-1636, pp. 5-6 (La.App.
-
State v. Rainey
882 So. 2d 716
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), ; State v. Gay, 34,371 (La.App.2d Cir.4/4/01), .
-
State v. Brewer
880 So. 2d 1005
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), .
-
State v. Green
880 So. 2d 179
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.03/04/98), ; State v. Gaddis, 36,661 (La.App.2d Cir.03/14/03), , writ denied, 2003-1275 (La.05/14/04), .
-
State v. Brown
880 So. 2d 899
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
Citing State v. Rome, 96-0991 (La.7/1/97), ; and, State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), .
-
State v. Terrell
876 So. 2d 43
La. 2004
See State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), .
-
State v. Peden
875 So. 2d 934
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
[21] State v. Johnson, 97-1906, p. 6 (La.3/4/98), ; State v. Dupre , 03-256 at p. 8, 848 So.2d at 153 .
-
State v. Simmons
875 So. 2d 1018
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
State v. Johnson, 97-1906, p. 6 (La.3/4/98), ; State v. Dupre, 03-256, p. 8 (La.App.
-
State v. Bailey
875 So. 2d 949
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
State v. Johnson, 97-1906, p. 6 (La.3/4/98), ; State v. Johnson, 03-620, p. 14 (La.App.
-
State v. Green
873 So. 2d 889
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), .
-
State v. Lemons
870 So. 2d 503
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), .
-
State v. Landry
871 So. 2d 1235
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2004
State v. Johnson, 97-1906, pp. 6-7 (La.3/4/98), .
-
State v. Taylor
880 So. 2d 831
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
[15] State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), ; State v. Cushinello, 01-109 (La.
-
State v. Douglas
868 So. 2d 896
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), ; State v. Cushinello, 01-109 (La.App.
-
State v. Pierre
869 So. 2d 206
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
In State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), , the Louisiana Supreme Court reexamined Dorthey , and outlined the criteria a defendant must meet in order to show that a mandatory minimum sentence under the Habitual Offender Law is constitutionally excessive.
-
State of Louisiana v. Dellandra Brett Todd
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
3/4/98), wherein Johnson was initially sentenced by the trial court to thirty months imprisonment for possession of marijuana and cocaine.
-
State v. Todd
866 So. 2d 1040
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
1 To support his contention that his sentence of twenty-five years is excessive, Defendant relies on State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), , wherein Johnson was initially sentenced by the trial court to thirty months imprisonment for possession of marijuana and cocaine.
-
State v. Smith
868 So. 2d 794
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
State v. Johnson, 97-1906, pp. 5-6 (La.3/4/98)
-
State v. Converse
864 So. 2d 803
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), at 676 .
-
State of Louisiana v. Christopher Ross
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
State v. Johnson, 97-1906, p. 8 (La.3/4/98), ( quoting from Judge Plotkin's concurrence in State v. Young , 94-1636, pp. 5-6 (La.App.
-
State v. Ross
861 So. 2d 888
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
State v. Johnson, 97-1906, p. 8 (La.3/4/98), ( quoting from Judge Plotkin's concurrence in State v. Young, 94-1636, pp. 5-6 (La.
-
State v. Fielding
862 So. 2d 420
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), .
-
State v. Young
863 So. 2d 658
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
State v. Johnson, 97-1906, p. 8 (La.3/4/98), .
-
State v. Johnson
864 So. 2d 645
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
15:529.1; State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), ().
-
State v. Wallace
862 So. 2d 286
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
State v. Johnson, 97-1906, p. 6-7 (La.3/4/98), ; -81 (La.1993).
-
State v. Terrell
858 So. 2d 1282
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
Following the Dorthey ruling, the court later found the need “to curtail the district court’s use of Dorthey in cases in which it appeared that the courts were simply substituting their judgment of what constituted an appropriate penalty for that of the legislature,” as seen by its rulings in State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), and State v. Lindsey, 99-3302, 99-3256 (La.10/17/00), , 343, cert.
-
State v. Rogers
862 So. 2d 963
La. 2003
see also State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), .
-
State v. Brown
861 So. 2d 644
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
[28] State v. Johnson, 97-1906, p. 8 (La.3/4/98), .
-
State v. Emanuel-Dunn
868 So. 2d 75
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
[2] In State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), , the Louisiana Supreme Court reexamined the issue of when Dorthey permits a downward departure from the mandatory minimum sentences in the Habitual Offender Law.
-
State v. Wilson
859 So. 2d 957
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
In State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.03/04/98), , the supreme court held that the mandatory minimum sentence of twenty years imprisonment was not unconstitutionally excessive for possession of cocaine by defendant as fourth-felony offender, even though defendant had no history of prior violent crimes.
-
State v. Howard
859 So. 2d 936
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
State v. Johnson, 1997-1906 (La.3/4/98), ; State v. Wade, 36,295 (La.App.2d Cir.10/23/02), , writ denied, 2002-2875 (La.4/4/03), .
-
State v. Warfield
859 So. 2d 307
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), .
-
State v. Johnson
860 So. 2d 180
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
State v. Johnson, 97-1906, p. 6 (La.3/4/98), ; State v. Williams, 01-1007, p. 11 (La.App.
-
State v. Jackson
860 So. 2d 134
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98)
-
State v. Howard
855 So. 2d 881
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), ; State v. Wade, 36,295 (La.App.2d Cir.10/23/02), , writ denied, 2002-2875 (La.
-
State v. Bates
859 So. 2d 841
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
Citing State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), , the supreme court in State v. Lindsey, 99-3302 (La.10/17/00), repeats: To rebut the presumption that the mandatory minimum sentence is constitutional, the defendant must clearly and convincingly show that: [he] is exceptional, which in this context means that because of unusual circumstances this defen
-
State v. Hernandez
860 So. 2d 94
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
State v. Johnson, 97-1906, p. 8 (La.3/4/98), .
-
State v. Berniard
860 So. 2d 66
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
State v. Johnson, 97-1906, p. 7 (La.3/4/98), ; Brown , 01-160 at 15, 788 So.2d at 676 .
-
State v. Wuneburger
860 So. 2d 78
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), ; State v. Dorthey, 623 So.2d *85 1276 (La.1993); State v. Cushinello, 01-109 (La.App.
-
State v. Ceasar
856 So. 2d 236
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), .
-
State v. Lebreton
859 So. 2d 785
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), .
-
State v. Houston
859 So. 2d 707
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
State v. Johnson, 97-1906, pp. 6-7 (La.3/4/98), ; -81 (La.1993).
-
State v. Oliver
857 So. 2d 1227
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
15:529.1; State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98)
-
State v. Royal
857 So. 2d 1167
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), ; State v. Armstrong, 99-925 (La.App.
-
State v. Surry
855 So. 2d 893
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.03/04/98)
-
State v. Lyles
858 So. 2d 35
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), ; State v. Cushinello, 01-109 (La.App.
-
State v. Bell
854 So. 2d 429
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
State v. Johnson, 97-1906, pp. 6-7 (La.3/4/98)
-
State v. Jones
850 So. 2d 782
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), .
-
State v. White
850 So. 2d 751
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), ; State v. Louis, 32,347 (La.App.2d Cir.10/27/99), .