DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Johnson, 709 So. 2d 672.

796 citing documents.

  • State v. Robert 931 So. 2d 1268 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
    A sentence within the statutory limit is constitutionally excessive if it is “grossly out of proportion to the severity of the crime” or is “nothing more than the purposeless imposition of pain and suffering.” State v. Landry, 871 So.2d at 1239-1240 , citing State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), .
  • State v. Washington 931 So. 2d 1120 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
    State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), .
  • State v. Washington 931 So. 2d 1120 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
    State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), .
  • State v. Williams 932 So. 2d 693 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
    In State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), , the Louisiana Supreme Court established the standard of review to be used in determining whether the trial court properly imposed under the Dorthey case a sentence less than the minimum sentence mandated by the Habitual Offender Law.
  • State v. Hall 929 So. 2d 281 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
    State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), ; State v. Grant, 39,102 (La.App.2d Cir.12/15/04), , writ denied, XXXX-XXXX (La.1/13/06), .
  • State v. Hebert 930 So. 2d 1039 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
    State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), .
  • State v. Roberson 929 So. 2d 789 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
    In State v. Johnson , XXXX-XXXX (La.03/04/98), , in the context of habitual offender sentencing, the supreme court stated: [T]o rebut the presumption that the mandatory minimum sentence is constitutional, the defendant must clearly and convincingly show that: [he] is exceptional, which in this context means that because of unusual circumstances this defendant is a
  • State v. Mead 927 So. 2d 1259 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
    art. III, Section 1; State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), .
  • State v. Lane 927 So. 2d 659 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
    State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), ; State v. Wade, 36,295 (La.
  • State v. Cuccia 933 So. 2d 134 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
    State v. Johnson, 97-1906, pp. 6-7 (La.3/4/98), ; State v. Webster, 98-0807, p. 3 (La.App.
  • State v. Smart 926 So. 2d 637 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
    State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), .
  • State v. Hargrove 924 So. 2d 477 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
    See State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.03/04/98), ; State v. Stephenson, 33,662 (La.App.2d Cir.08/23/00), , writ denied, 00-2686 (La.08/31/01), .
  • State v. Joseph 921 So. 2d 1060 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
    State v. Johnson, 97-1906, pp. 6-7 (La.3/4/98), ().
  • State v. Jefferson 922 So. 2d 577 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2005
    State v. Johnson, 97-1906, pp. 6-7 (La.3/4/98), ; -81 (La.1993).
  • State v. Jarreau 921 So. 2d 155 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
    In State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), , reh’g denied, (5/3/98), the Supreme Court discussed the Dorthey case and set forth the guidelines that courts must use in determining whether a sentence imposed under the Habitual Offender Law is unconstitutionally excessive.
  • State v. Scott 927 So. 2d 441 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
    In State v. Johnson, 97-1906, pp. 7-9 (La.3/4/98), -677 , the Louisiana Supreme Court reexamined the issue of when Dorthey |7permits a downward departure from the mandatory minimum sentences in the Habitual Offender Law.
  • State v. Washington 917 So. 2d 488 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
    State v. Johnson, 97-1906, pp. 6-7 (La.3/4/98), ().
  • State v. Washington 917 So. 2d 488 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
    State v. Johnson, 97-1906, pp. 6-7 (La.3/4/98), ().
  • State v. Yrle 916 So. 2d 1197 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
    State v. Johnson, 97-1906, p. 6 (La.3/4/98), ; State v. Bailey, 04-85, p. 15 (La.App.
  • State v. Randell 911 So. 2d 393 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
    State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), ; State v. Wade, 36,295 (La.App.
  • State v. Lee 909 So. 2d 672 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
    State v. Walter Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), .
  • State v. Callier 909 So. 2d 23 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
    See State v. Johnson, XXXX-XXXX (La.3/4/96), ; State v. Stephenson, 33,662 (La.App.
  • State v. Clark 909 So. 2d 1007 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
    [29] State v. Johnson, 97-1906, pp. 6-7 (La.3/4/98), ().
  • State v. Stevenson 908 So. 2d 48 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
    [16] State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98)
  • State v. Thomas 904 So. 2d 896 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
    State v. Johnson, 97-1906, p. 6 (La.3/4/98)
  • State v. Robinson 905 So. 2d 405 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
    State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), .
  • State v. Walker 902 So. 2d 526 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
    State v. Johnson, 97-1906, p. 6 (La.3/4/98), .
  • State v. Fleming 902 So. 2d 451 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
    State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), (quoting State v. Young, 94-1636 (La.App.
  • State v. Session 902 So. 2d 506 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
    See State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), .
  • State v. Guillard 902 So. 2d 1061 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
    15:529.1(A)(1)(b)(ii); State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), .
  • State v. McCloud 901 So. 2d 498 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
    State v. Johnson, 97-1906, pp. 6-7 (La.3/4/98), ().
  • State v. Dorsey 907 So. 2d 154 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
    In State v. Johnson, 97-1906, p. 8 (La.3/4/98), , the Louisiana Supreme Court reexamined the issue of when a downward departure from the mandatory minimum sentence in a habitual offender case is permitted, stating, in pertinent part: [T]o rebut the presumption that the mandatory minimum sentence is constitutional, *159 the defendant must clearly and convincing
  • State v. Dixon 900 So. 2d 929 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
    Defendant failed to urge the trial court to deviate from the mandatory minimum, in accordance with State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), .
  • State v. Sykes 900 So. 2d 156 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2005
    State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), .
  • State v. Bajoie 899 So. 2d 78 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
    A sentence within the statutory limit is constitutionally excessive if it is 1 (-“grossly out *82 of proportion to the severity of the crime” or is “nothing more than the purposeless imposition of pain and suffering.” State v. Landry, 871 So.2d at 1239-1240 , citing State v. Johnson, 97-1906 pp. 6-7 (La.3/4/98), ; State v. Melancon, 2001-1656 (La.App.
  • State v. Jackson 895 So. 2d 695 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
    State v. Johnson, 1997-1906 (La.03/04/98), ; State v. *700 Gay, 34,371 (La.App.2d Cir.04/04/01), .
  • State v. Richardson 896 So. 2d 257 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
    State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.03/04/98), ; State v. Green, 38,335 (La.App.2d Cir.05/12/04), , writ denied, XXXX-XXXX (La.11/24/04), .
  • State v. Hensley 900 So. 2d 1 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
    [34] State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), .
  • State v. Donnaud 896 So. 2d 1151 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
    State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), ().
  • State v. Bonner 895 So. 2d 1 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
    In State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.03/04/98), , in the context of habitual offender sentencing, the supreme court stated: [T]o rebut the presumption that the mandatory minimum sentence is constitutional, the defendant must clearly and convincingly show that: [he] is exceptional, which in this context means that because of unusual circumstances this defendant is a
  • State v. Lowery 890 So. 2d 711 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
    State v. Johnson, 97-1906, p. 7 (La.3/4/98), .
  • State v. Bertrand 891 So. 2d 752 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
    State v. Johnson, 97-1906, pp. 6-7 (La.3/4/98), .
  • State v. Grant 890 So. 2d 689 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
    State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), ; State v. Gay, supra .
  • State v. Brooks 889 So. 2d 1064 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
    State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), .
  • State v. Williams 889 So. 2d 1135 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
    State v. Johnson, 97-1906, pp. 6-7 (La.3/4/98), ().
  • State of Louisiana v. Jim Howard, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
  • State v. Howard 888 So. 2d 375 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    [18] State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), .
  • State v. Walker 886 So. 2d 641 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
    State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), ; State v. Gay, 34,371 (La.App.2d Cir.4/4/01), .
  • State v. Carter 888 So. 2d 928 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
    State v. Johnson, 97-1906, pp. 6-7 (La.3/4/98), ().
  • State v. Johnson 884 So. 2d 568 La. 2004
    State v. Johnson, 97-1906, p. 8 (La.3/4/98), .