Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Hewitt v. Allstate Ins. Co., 726 So. 2d 1120.
- Christian Blaine Perkins v. Dusty King La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
- Brandon S. Wise Indv. and Obo Drey Domone Wise v. George O'Neil and Antoinette O'Neil La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2020
- Akers v. Columns Hotel, Inc. 220 So. 3d 138 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
-
Mitchell Lemaire v. John Frank Blanchard, Jr.
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
4 Cir. 1/27/99), -25, where the court clarified the purpose of the exclusion: The focus of the policy exclusion is on the cause of the damages, not the cause of action alleged.
- Pd v. Swl 993 So. 2d 240 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
- P.D. v. S.W.L. 993 So. 2d 240 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
- Kevin James Mouton v. Allison Thomas La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
- Mouton v. Thomas 924 So. 2d 394 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
- Bamert v. Johnson 909 So. 2d 705 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
-
Leslie v. Andrews
905 So. 2d 368
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2005
4 Cir. 1/27/99) , , is instructive regarding the interpretation of intentional act exclusions.
-
Ralph Allen Perkins, Etc. v. Harry Shaheen, Etc.
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
4 Cir. 1/27/99), -25, where the court clarified the purpose of the exclusion: The focus of the policy exclusion is on the cause of the damages, not the cause of action alleged.
-
Perkins v. Shaheen
867 So. 2d 135
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
4 Cir. 1/27/99), -25 , where the court clarified the purpose of the exclusion: The focus of the policy exclusion is on the cause of the damages, not the cause of action alleged.
- Prestenbach v. Badeaux 865 So. 2d 180 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
- Inzinna v. Walcott 868 So. 2d 721 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
-
West Ex Rel. West v. Watson
799 So. 2d 1189
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
4th Cir.1/27/99), ; (La.App.
-
Norwood v. Van Veckhoven
792 So. 2d 836
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
4th Cir.1/27/99), ; Sperli v. Guiterrez, 00-1089, (La.App.
- Dupre' v. ABC Insurance Co. 776 So. 2d 25 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
-
Neuman v. Mauffray
771 So. 2d 283
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
App. 4 Cir. 1/27/99), -1125 ; (La.App.
- Sperli v. Guiterrez 772 So. 2d 805 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000