Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite O'REGAN v. Preferred Enterprises, Inc., 758 So. 2d 124.

55 citing documents.

Trinidad Preciado v. Beaucoup Crawfish of Eunice La Restaurant Association Sif La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
23:1031; O’Regan v. Preferred Enterprises, Inc., 98–1602 (La.3/17/00)
Robert James Lee Guidry v. Worknet 2000, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
Guy Lecompte v. St. Tammany Parish School Board La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2021
Leontine Moran Versus Rouse's Enterprises, LLC and Great American Alliance Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2019
3/17/00), (quoting Atchison v. May, 201 La.
James Arness Thomas v. Marsala Beverage Company La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2019
Sislo v. New Orleans Center for Creative Arts 198 So. 3d 1202 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
See O’Regan v. Preferred Enterprises, Inc., 98-1602, p. 18 (La.3/17/00), (explaining the no-fault remedy and quid pro, quo scheme provided by the Workers’ Compensation Act).
Carr v. Sanderson Farm, Inc. 189 So. 3d 450 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
See O’Regan v. Preferred Enterprises, Inc., 98-1602 (La.3/17/00), ; Holliday v. State ex rel.
James Clifford Arrant v. Graphic Packaging International, Inc. C/W Marvin Jack Barnett, Jr. v. Graphic Packaging International, Inc. … La. 2015
Arrant v. Graphic Packaging International, Inc. 169 So. 3d 296 La. 2015
Fruge, 137 So.2d at 339 ; see also Rando, supra, pp. 8-9 , 16 So.3d at 1075 ; O’Regan v. Preferred Enterprises, Inc., 98-1602 (La.3/17/00), .
Phillips v. Sanderson Farms, Inc. 136 So. 3d 27 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
O'Regan v. Preferred Enterprises, Inc., 98-1602, p. 18 (La.3/17/00), .
Johnson v. Motiva Enterprises LLC 128 So. 3d 483 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
See O’Regan v. Prefer)~ed Enterprises, Inc., (La.
Haas v. Dillard's, Inc. 127 So. 3d 1 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
O’Regan v. Preferred Enterprises, Inc., 1998-1602 (La.03/17/00), .
Arrant v. Graphic Packaging International, Inc. 127 So. 3d 924 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
O'Regan v. Preferred Enterprises, Inc., 98-1602 (La.3/17/00), .
Ruiz v. City of New Orleans 109 So. 3d 52 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
23:1031; O’Regan v. Preferred Enterprises, Inc., 98-1602 (La.3/17/00); .
Lloyd v. Shady Lake Nursing Home, Inc. 92 So. 3d 560 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
O’Regan v. Preferred Enterprises, Inc., 98-1602 (La.3/17/00), , footnote 20.
Simmons v. BAUMER FOODS, INC. 55 So. 3d 789 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
O’Regan v. Preferred Enterprises, Inc., 98-1602, p. 14 (La.3/17/00), ; see also La.
Lloyd v. Shady Lake Nursing Home, Inc. 47 So. 3d 609 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
O’Regan v. Preferred Enterprises, Inc., 1998-1602 (La.3/17/00), .
Rando v. Anco Insulations Inc. 16 So. 3d 1065 La. 2009
Fruge, 137 So.2d at 339 ; see also O’Regan v. Preferred Enterprises, Inc., 98-1602 (La.3/17/00), .
Thomas v. Hollywood Casino 13 So. 3d 717 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
Inc., 98-1602 (La.3/17/00), .
Dorion v. Gulf States Asphalt Co., L.P. 14 So. 3d 44 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
3 Cir. 12/8/04) , , writ denied, 05-0086 (La.3/18/05), (citing O'Regan v. Preferred Enter., Inc., 98-1602, pp. 10-13 (La.3/17/00), ).
Workers'comp. Corp. v. Nat. Serv. Indust. 980 So. 2d 130 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
23:1031; O'Regan v. Preferred Enterprises, Inc., 98-1602 (La.3/17/00), ; (La.
In Re Med. Malprac. Claims Regard. Diecidue 972 So. 2d 485 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
art. 2; O'Regan v. Preferred Enterprises, Inc., 98-1602, p. 4 (La.3/17/00), ; Cat's Meow v. City of New Orleans, 98-0601, p. 15 (La.10/20/98), .
Hankton v. City of New Orleans 973 So. 2d 851 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
[3] Relying on O'Regan v. Preferred Enterprises, Inc., 98-1602 (La.3/17/00), , this court found that because Ms. Hankton had alleged a type of mental disability that fell outside the ambit of workers' compensation coverage, she must be allowed to pursue her tort claims in civil court.
Irene Prejean v. the Original Kevin Guidry Produce Market, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
4 3/17/00), the Louisiana Supreme Court explained the quid pro quo scheme provided by the Act: The Act was a compromise between labor and industry pursuant to which labors received guaranteed no-fault recovery and industry was relieved of the possibility of large damage awards in the tort system.
Prejean v. ORIGINAL KEVIN GUIDRY PROD. MKT. 970 So. 2d 1200 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
3/17/00),5 , the Louisiana Supreme Court explained the quid pro quo scheme provided by the Act: The Act was a compromise between labor and industry pursuant to which labors received guaranteed no-fault recovery and industry was relieved of the possibility of large damage awards in the tort system.
Ruffin v. Poland Enterprises, LLC 946 So. 2d 695 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
In O'Regan v. Preferred Enterprises, Inc., XXXX-XXXX (La.3/17/00), , the Supreme Court noted: The defendant's argument that the Act provides the exclusive coverage for occupational diseases is misplaced with respect to LA.
Jim Walter Homes, Inc. v. John C. Guilbeau La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
3/17/00), (quoting Atchison v. May, 201 La.
Jim Walter Homes, Inc. v. Guilbeau 934 So. 2d 239 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
O'Regan v. Preferred Enters., Inc., 98-1602, p. 5 (La.3/17/00), (quoting Atchison v. May, 201 La.
Jenkinson v. North Oaks Medical Center 938 So. 2d 717 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
23:1031.1(B); O’Regan v. Preferred Enterprises, Inc., 98-1602 (La.3/17/00), .
State of Louisiana v. Devrin P. Doucette La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
CIV.CODE art. 2; Cat’s Meow v. City of New Orleans, 98-0601 (La.10/20/98), O'Regan v. Preferred Enterprises, Inc., 98-1602 (La.3/17/00)
State v. Doucette 899 So. 2d 159 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
CIV.CODE art. 2; Cat's Meow v. City of New Orleans, 98-0601 (La.10/20/98), ; O'Regan v. Preferred Enterprises, Inc., 98-1602 (La.3/17/00), .
Deshotel v. Guichard Operating Co., Inc. 916 So. 2d 72 La. 2004
CODE art. 2; O'Regan v. Preferred Enterprises, Inc., 98-1602 (La.3/17/00), (citations omitted).
Thomas v. Alliance Compressors 889 So. 2d 424 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
See O'Regan v. Preferred Enterprises, Inc., 98-1602, pp. 10-13 (La.3/17/00), -33 .
Samuel Alexander v. Thiokol Corporation La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
This “exclusive list,” as we observed in O’Regan v. Preferred Enterprises, Inc., 98-1602, p.6 (La.3/17/00), (on rehearing), included diseases caused by contact with specific substances, namely the diseases of contact poisoning from enumerated sources, asbestosis, silicosis, dermatosis, and pneumoconiosis.
Alexander v. Thiokol Corp. 887 So. 2d 685 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
This "exclusive list," as we observed in O'Regan v. Preferred Enterprises, Inc., 98-1602, p. 6 (La.3/17/00), (on rehearing), included diseases caused by contact with specific substances, namely the diseases of contact poisoning from enumerated sources, asbestosis, silicosis, dermatosis, and pneumoconiosis.
Apeck Construction, Inc. v. Foster M. Bowers La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
3/17/00), (quoting Atchison v. May, 201 La.
Apeck Const., Inc. v. Bowers 862 So. 2d 1087 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
O'Regan v. Preferred Enters., Inc., 98-1602, p. 5 (La.3/17/00), (quoting Atchison v. May, 201 La.
Anthony Deshotel v. Guichard Operating Company, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
3/17/00), permits a wrongful death claim, under Louisiana Civil Code Article 2315.2, by the non-dependent children of an employee against the employer.
Deshotel v. Guichard Operating Co., Inc. 861 So. 2d 697 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
Plaintiffs contend the recent Louisiana Supreme Court case of O'Regan v. Preferred Enterprises, Inc., 98-1602 (La.3/17/00), , permits a wrongful death claim, under Louisiana Civil Code Article 2315.2, by the non-dependent children of an employee against the employer.
Dunaway v. Lakeview Regional Medical Center 859 So. 2d 131 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
See O'Regan v. Preferred Enterprises, Inc., 98-1602, pp. 10-13 (La.3/17/00), -33 .
McLin v. Industrial Specialty Contractors 851 So. 2d 1135 La. 2003
23:1031; O'Regan v. Preferred Enterprises, Inc., 98-1602 (La.3/17/00)
Perritt v. Dona 849 So. 2d 56 La. 2003
art. 2; O'Regan v. Preferred Enterprises, Inc., 98-1602 (La.3/17/00), ; Cat's Meow v. City of New Orleans, 98-0601 (La.10/20/98), .
Smith v. Southern Holding, Inc. 839 So. 2d 5 La. 2003
Civ Code art. 2; O'Reagan v. Preferred Enterprises, Inc., 98-1602, p. 4 (La.3/17/00), ; Cat's Meow, Inc. v. City of New Orleans, 98-0601, p. 15 (La.10/20/98), .
Fontenot v. Reddell Vidrine Water Dist. 836 So. 2d 14 La. 2003
O'Regan v. Preferred Enterprises, Inc., 98-1602 (La.3/17/00), ; Roberts v. Sewerage & Water Bd.
Austin v. Abney Mills, Inc. 824 So. 2d 1137 La. 2002
This "exclusive list," as we observed in O'Regan v. Preferred Enterprises, Inc., 98-1602, p. 6 (La.3/17/00), (on rehearing), included diseases caused by contact with specific substances, namely the diseases of contact poisoning from enumerated sources, asbestosis, silicosis, dermatosis, and pneumoconiosis.
Dunn v. Riverview Medical Center 822 So. 2d 736 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
See O’Regan v. Preferred Enter., Inc., 98-1602 (La.3/17/00), .
Killett v. Sanderson Farms 818 So. 2d 853 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
See O'Regan v. Preferred Enterprises, Inc., 98-1602, pp. 2 & 7 (La.3/17/00), , 127 & 130.
Flowers v. Coastal Cargo Co. 815 So. 2d 198 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
Mr. Flowers cites O’Regan v. Preferred Enterprises, Inc. 98-1602 (La.3/17/00), , as support for his argument to claim loss of earning-potential under the WCA while receiving other benefits under LHWCA.
Carmean v. Enterprise Products Partners, L.L.P. 804 So. 2d 95 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
O’Regan v. Preferred Enterprises, Inc., 98-1602, p. 11 (La.3/17/00), .
Page v. Abigails 799 So. 2d 785 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
“[T]herefore, interpretation of a law is primarily the search for the Legislature’s intent.” O’Regan v. Preferred Enterprises, Inc., 98-1602, p. 4 (La.3/17/00); .