Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Castleberry, 758 So. 2d 749.

197 citing documents.

State v. Victor 195 So. 3d 128 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
See State v. Castleberry, 98-1388 (La.4/13/99), , cert.
State of Louisiana Versus Errol Victor, Sr. La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2016
State of Louisiana v. Debbie E. Adams AKA Debbie Adams La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
See State v. Castleberry, 98-1388, pp. 28-29 (La.4/13/99), (absence from the record of four unrecorded bench conferences did not deny defendant effective appellate review; three of the conferences had no discernible impact on the proceedings and the fourth concerned a mistrial motion whose basis was readily discernible in the recorded testimony of the
State of Louisiana v. Mark Wayne Thibodeaux La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
State v. Thibodeaux 190 So. 3d 426 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
In State v. Castleberry, 98-1388 (La.4/13/99), , cert.
State v. Wells 191 So. 3d 1127 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
receive every single transcript does not entitle him to relief, as-“an incomplete record may nonetheless be adequate for appellate review.” State v. Castleberry, 98-1388, p. 29 (La.4/13/99), .
State v. Dabney 176 So. 3d 515 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
art. 770; see State v. Castleberry, 98-1388, p. 22 (La.65 4/13/99), (mistrial is a drastic remedy and, except for instances in which the mandatory mistrial provisions of La.
Luis Hernandez v. Uno Enterprise La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
Hernandez v. Louisiana Workers' Compensation Corp. 166 So. 3d 456 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
State v. Castleberry, 98-1388, p. 5 (La.4/13/99), , cert.
State of Louisiana v. Mark Wayne Thibodeaux La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
State v. Castleberry, 98-1388, p. 29 (La.4/13/99), (citing State v. Hawkins, 96-0766 (La.1/14/97), ).
State v. Thibodeaux 162 So. 3d 665 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
State v. Castleberry, 98-1388, p. 29 (La.4/13/99), (citing State v. Hawkins, 96-0766 (La.1/14/97), ).
State in the Interest of J.C.R. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
State v. Castleberry, 98-1388, p. 29 (La.4/13/99), cert.
State ex rel. J.C.R. 157 So. 3d 1284 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
State v. Castleberry, 98-1388, p. 29 (La.4/13/99), , cert, denied, 528 U.S. 893 , 120 S.Ct.
State v. Stipe 167 So. 3d 942 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
State v. Castleberry, 98-1388, p. 5 (La.4/13/99), , cert.
Robertson v. Doug Ashy Building Materials, Inc. 168 So. 3d 556 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
5th Cir 12/19/13), , writ denied, 2014-0284, 2014-0287 (La.9/19/14), , citing State v. Castleberry, 98-1388 (La.4/13/99), , cert.
State v. Greenberry 154 So. 3d 700 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
4 Cir. 7/14/10), (quoting State v. Castleberry, 98-1388, p. 22 (La.4/13/99), ).
State v. Jasper 149 So. 3d 1239 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
4 Cir. 12/4/02), (citing State v. Castleberry 98-1388, p. 28 (La.4/13/99), ; State v. Chester, 97-2790, p. 8 (La.12/1/98), ); see also State v. Coleman, 02-1000, p. 16 (La.App.
State v. Simms 143 So. 3d 1258 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
art. 770 are applicable, should only be used when substantial prejudice to the defendant is shown.” State v. Castleberry, 98-1388, p. 22 (La.4/13/99), .
Roberts v. Rudzis 146 So. 3d 602 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State v. Castleberry, 98-1388 (La.4/13/99), , cert.
State of Louisiana v. Ronald Pete La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
State v. Castleberry, 98-1388, p. 29 (La.4/13/99), cert.
State v. Pete 134 So. 3d 196 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State v. Castleberry, 98-1388, p. 29 (La.4/13/99), , cert.
State v. Rosales 132 So. 3d 1285 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2014
State v. Castleberry, 98-1388, p. 5 (La.4/13/99), , cert.
State v. Coleman 133 So. 3d 9 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
art. 770 are applicable, should only be used when substantial prejudice to the defendant is shown.” State v. Castleberry, 98-1388, p. 22 (La.4/13/99), .
State v. Tassin 129 So. 3d 1235 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2013
State v. Castleberry, 98-1388 (La.4/13/99), , cert.
State v. Williams 128 So. 3d 359 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Castleberry, 98-1388 (La.4/13/99), , cert.
State v. Aston 125 So. 3d 1148 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Castleberry, 98-1388 (La.4/13/99); , cert.
State v. Hollins 123 So. 3d 840 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
art. 770 are applicable, should only be used when substantial prejudice to the defendant is shown.” State v. Castleberry, 98-1388, p. 22 (La.4/13/99), (citations omitted).
State of Louisiana v. Eric John Anderson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
State v. Anderson 116 So. 3d 1045 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
“For an accomplice’s testimony to be materially corroborated ‘it is enough if there is evidence that confirms material points in the accomplice’s tale, and confirms the defendant’s identity and some relationship to the situation.’” State v. Castleberry, 98-1388, p. 13 (La.4/13/99), , cert.
State of Louisiana v. Demarcus W. Law La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
See, e.g., Hoffman, 98-3118 at 50- 51, 768 So.2d at 587 (trial court cured any record problems “by summarizing substantive unrecorded conferences for the record”); State v. Castleberry, 98-1388, pp. 28-29 (La.4/13/99), (three unrecorded bench conferences during direct examination of state witnesses had no discernible impact on the proceedings and the fourth concerned a mistrial motion by defense counsel, the basis of which was “easily ascertainable from the record” without regard to the unrecord
State v. Law 110 So. 3d 1271 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
See, e.g., Hoffman, 98-3118 at 50-51, 768 So.2d at 587 (trial court cured any record problems “by summarizing substantive unrecorded conferences for the record”); State v. Castleberry, 98-1388, pp. 28-29 (La.4/13/99), (three unrecorded bench conferences during direct examination of state witnesses had no discernible impact on the proceedings and the fourth concerned a mistrial motion by defense counsel, the basis of which was “easily ascertainable from the record” without regard to the unrecorde
State v. Breaux 110 So. 3d 281 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
4 Cir. 12/4/02), (citing State v. Castleberry, 98-1388, p. 28 (La.4/13/99), ; State v. Chester, 97-2790, p. 8 l4(La.12/l/98), ); see also State v. Coleman, 2002-1000, p. 16 (La.App.
State ex rel. O.W. 160 So. 3d 174 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2013
637 , 175 L.Ed.2d 490 (2009); State v. Castleberry, 98-1388 (La.4/13/99), .
State v. Williams 107 So. 3d 763 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
State v. Hughes, supra; State v. Castleberry, 98-1388 (La.4/13/99), , cert.
State of Louisiana v. Jody D. Hamilton La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
See, e.g., Hoffman, 98-3118 at 50-51, 768 So.2d at 587 (trial court cured any record problems “by summarizing substantive unrecorded conferences for the record”); State v. Castleberry, 98-1388, pp. 28-29 (La.4/13/99), (three unrecorded bench conferences during direct examination of state witnesses had no discernible impact on the proceedings and the fourth concerned a mistrial motion by defense counsel, the basis of which was “easily ascertainable from the record” without regard to the unrecorde
State v. Henry 102 So. 3d 1016 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
4 Cir. 7/14/10), (quoting State v. Castleberry, 98-1388, p. 22 (La.4/13/99), ): A trial court has broad discretion in determining whether conduct is so prejudicial as to deprive an accused of a fair trial.
State v. Grant 105 So. 3d 81 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
State v. Hughes, supra; State v. Castleberry, 98-1388 (La.4/13/99), , cert.
State of Louisiana v. Terrance L. Sinegal La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
See, e.g., Hoffman, 98-3118 at 50-51, 768 So.2d at 587 (trial court cured any record problems ―by summarizing substantive unrecorded conferences for the record‖); State v. Castleberry, 98-1388, pp. 28-29 (La.4/13/99), (three unrecorded bench conferences during direct examination of state witnesses had no discernible impact on the proceedings and the 30 fourth concerned a mistrial motion by defense counsel, the basis of which was ―easily ascertainable from the re
State v. Sinegal 97 So. 3d 649 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
See, e.g., Hoffman, 98-3118 at 50-51, 768 So.2d at 587 (trial court cured any record problems “by summarizing substantive unrecorded conferences for the record”); State v. Castleberry, 98-1388, pp. 28-29 (La.4/13/99), (three unrecorded bench conferences during direct exami *669 nation of state witnesses had no discernible impact on the proceedings and the | ^fourth concerned a mistrial motion by defense counsel, the basis of which was “easily ascertainable from the record” without regard to the
State of Louisiana v. L. W. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
See, e.g., Hoffman, 98-3118 at 50-51, 768 So.2d at 587 (trial court cured any record problems ―by summarizing substantive unrecorded conferences for the record‖); State v. Castleberry, 98-1388, pp. 28-29 (La.4/13/99), (three unrecorded bench conferences during direct examination of state witnesses had no discernible impact on the proceedings and the fourth concerned a mistrial motion by defense counsel, the basis of which was ―easily ascertainable from the record‖ without regard to the unrecorde
State ex rel. J.T. 94 So. 3d 847 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
637 , 175 L.Ed.2d 490 (2009); State v. Castleberry, 98-1388 (La.4/13/99), .
State v. Higginbotham 122 So. 3d 1 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
537 , 169 L.Ed.2d 377 (2007) (upheld conviction where record included testimony of all witnesses); State v. Castleberry, 98-1388 (La.4/13/99), , cert.
State of Louisiana v. Marlon Roberson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
See State v. Castleberry, 98-1388, p. 29 (La.4/13/99), [.]
Donna D. Johnson, Et Ux. v. State of Louisiana, Dept. of Transportation & Development La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
Id.; State v. Castleberry, 1998-1388 (La.4/13/99)
Johnson v. State, Dept. of Transportation & Development 85 So. 3d 204 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Id,.; State v. Castleberry, 1998-1388 (La.4/13/99), .
State v. Maxwell 83 So. 3d 113 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
art. 770 are applicable, should only be used when substantial prejudice to the defendant is shown.” State v. Castleberry, 98-1388, p. 22 (La.4/13/99), .
State v. Rubens 83 So. 3d 30 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
4 Cir. 12/6/00), -863 , citing State v. Castle- *66 berry, 98-1888, p. 29 (La.4/13/99), .
State v. Burton 71 So. 3d 379 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Castleberry, 98-1388, p. 29 (La.4/13/99), , cert.
State v. Patton 68 So. 3d 1209 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Castleberry, 98-1388 (La.4/13/99), , cert.
Dixie Roofing and Sheet Metal Company, Inc. v. Anita Jean Holmes Reeves Simon La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
4/13/99), ” Cheairs v. State ex rel.