Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Nicholas v. Allstate Ins. Co., 765 So. 2d 1017.
- St. Charles Surgical Hospital, L.L.C. v. Louisiana Health Service & Indemnity D/B/A Blue Cross Blue Shield of Louisiana, … La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2026
- Brett Lirette v. Jason C. Adams, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, Geico Casualty Company & Axis Ventures, … La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2024
-
Barber Brothers Contracting Company, LLC v. Capitol City Produce Company, LLC Frank Cushenberry And Xyz Insurance Company C/W …
La. 2024
8/31/00), Rosell, 549 So.
-
Arona T. Walker and Arona Walker on Behalf of Leona C. Walker v. Kate Brown, Md, and Her …
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2024
8/31/00), see also Georgia Gulf Corp. v. Board of Ethics for Public Employees, [19]96-1907, p. 5-6 (La.
-
David Gniady v. Ochsner Clinic Foundation
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2023
8/31/00), -23; Georgia Gulf Corp. v. Bd.
-
Certain Underwriters of Lloyd's London v. Alliance Drilling Consultants, LLC
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
Nicholas v. Allstate Insurance Company, 99-2522, p. 8 (La.8/31/00), (La.App.
-
In the Matter of the Custody of L.W.B. and M.N.B.
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2020
8/ 31/ 00), - 23 ( recognizing that appellate courts may consider arguments on appeal not specifically raised as assignments of error); see also La.
- Thomas Lavigne v. Allied Shipyard, Inc., Ronald L. Callais, the Gray Insurance Company, Inc., D/B/A Gray & Company, … La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2020
- Jerry R. Bagwell v. Union Carbide Corporation La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2019
- Pelitire v. Rinker 270 So. 3d 817 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
- Shephard v. AIX Energy, Inc. 249 So. 3d 194 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2018
- Holmes v. Lea 250 So. 3d 1004 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
-
Brandi Billeaudeau v. Opelousas General Hospital Authority
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
8/31/00), the Louisiana Supreme Court explained: Louisiana jurisprudence is well established that an appellate court must exercise great restraint before it reverses a jury verdict because of erroneous jury instructions.
- Ron Warren, Individually and on Behalf of the Estate of Derek Hebert v. Shelter Mutual Insurance Company La. 2017
-
State ex rel. Collier v. State
222 So. 3d 699
La. 2017
The determinative question in a claim such as Mr. Collier’s is “whether the jury instructions misled the jury to the extent that it was prevented from dispensing justice.” Nicholas v. Allstate Insurance Company, 99-2522, p. 8 (La.8/31/00), ; (La.
- Jeff Mercer, LLC v. State ex rel. Department of Transportation & Development 222 So. 3d 1017 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
-
Ron Warren, Ind. & O/B/O Estate of Derek Hebert v. Shelter Mutual Ins. Co.
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
8/31/00), 4 “The basis for this rule of law is that trial courts are given broad discretion in formulating jury instructions and it is well accepted that a trial court judgment will not be reversed as long as the charge correctly states the substance of the law.” Id.
-
Warren v. Shelter Mutual Insurance Co.
196 So. 3d 776
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Co., 99-2522, p. 8 (La.8/31/00), .
-
Andre Perkins v. Tricia N. Guidry, M.D.
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
Co., 99–2522, p. 8 (La.8/31/00), ).
-
Perkins v. Guidry
191 So. 3d 1182
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Co., 99-2522, p. 8 (La.8/31/00), ).
-
Terri Sayre v. Pnk (Lake Charles), LLC D/B/A L'Auberge Du Lac
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
8/31/00), 1 The basis for this rule of law is that trial courts are given broad discretion in formulating jury instructions, and it is well accepted that a trial court judgment will not be reversed as long as the charge correctly states the substance of the law.
-
Sayre v. PNK (Lake Charles), LLC
188 So. 3d 428
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Nicholas v. Allstate Insurance Company, 99-2522 (La.8/31/00), .
- Sherry Wedgeworth, Et Ux. v. Tynes E. Mixon, III, M.D. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
-
Wedgeworth v. Mixon
184 So. 3d 876
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Co., 99-2522, p. 8 (La.8/31/00), ).
-
Matranga v. Parish Anesthesia of Jefferson, LLC
170 So. 3d 1077
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Id., citing Nicholas v. Allstate Insurance Company, 99-2522, p. 8 (La.8/31/00), .
-
Sullivan v. Malta Park
156 So. 3d 751
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Co., 99-2522, p. 10 (La.11/31/00), -25 ).
-
Morgan v. Morgan
153 So. 3d 557
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
Co., 99-2522 (La.8/31/00), .
-
Chet David Jeansonne v. Cory Paul Roy
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
8/31/00), Miller v. Mier, 04-992 (La.App.
-
Jacintiea Deville v. Donald Robinson, Sr.
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
Co., 99-2522 (La.8/31/00)
-
Deville v. Robinson
132 So. 3d 1277
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Co., 99-2522 (La.8/31/00), .
-
Ricky Fontenot v. Liberty Mutual Fire Ins. Co.
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
8/31/00), : Louisiana jurisprudence is well established that an appellate court must exercise great restraint before it reverses a jury verdict because of erroneous jury instructions.
-
Peironnet v. Matador Resources Co.
144 So. 3d 791
La. 2013
Co., 99-2522, p. 8 (La.8/31/00), ; see also, Wooley v. Lucksinger, 09-0571, 09-0584, 09-0585, 09-0586, p. 82 (La.4/1/11), .
-
Davis v. Recreation Department
107 So. 3d 1254
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Co., 99-2522, pp. 7-8 (La.8/31/00), ).
- Bcm, L.L.C. v. Roy Clifton Cheatwood La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
- Derek Page v. H. Cookie Benson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
-
Page v. Benson
101 So. 3d 545
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Co., 99-2522 (La.8/31/00), .
-
Peironnet v. Matador Resources Co.
103 So. 3d 445
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
Co., 99-2522 (La.8/31/00), , the Louisiana Supreme Court addressed the issue of an erroneous jury charge as follows: Louisiana jurisprudence is well established that an appellate court must exercise great restraint before it reverses a jury verdict because of erroneous jury instructions.
-
Maloney Cinque, L.L.C. v. Pacific Insurance Co.
89 So. 3d 12
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Co., 99-2522, pp. 7-8 (La.8/31/00), -23 .
-
J.R.A. Inc. v. Essex Insurance Co.
72 So. 3d 862
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
Co., 99-2522, pp. 7-8 (La.8/31/00), -1023 ; Georgia Gulf Corp. v. Board of Ethics for Public Employees, 96-1907, pp. 5-6 (La.5/9/97), .
-
Merrill v. Greyhound Lines, Inc.
60 So. 3d 600
La. 2011
Co., 99-2522, pp. 7-8 (La.8/31/00), -1023 ; Georgia GulfCorp.
-
Wooley v. Lucksinger
61 So. 3d 507
La. 2011
Co., 1999-2522 p.7-8 (La.8/31/00), ; see also Georgia Gulf Corp. v. Board of Ethics for Public Employees, 96-1907 p. 5-6 (La.5/9/97), .
-
Wegener v. Lafayette Insurance Co.
60 So. 3d 1220
La. 2011
Adams v. Rhodia, Inc. 2007-2110 (La.5/21/08), ; Nicholas v. Allstate Insurance Company, 1999-2522 (La.8/31/00), .
-
W.T.A. v. M.Y.
58 So. 3d 612
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
Co., 99-2522 (La.8/31/00), .
- Dwight Phillips and Joy Phillips, Indiv., Etc. v. Lafayette Parish School Board La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
-
Phillips v. Lafayette Parish School Board
54 So. 3d 739
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Co., 99-2522 (La.8/31/00), .
-
Burns v. CLK Investments V, L.L.C.
45 So. 3d 1152
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Co., 99-2522, pp. 8-9 (La.8/31/00), , requires that in addition to finding an erroneous jury instruction, we must also find that the instruction “likely contributed to the verdict before we engage in a de novo review of the jury’s verdict.” Since we have not found an erroneous instruction, *1159 we are surely not authorized to review the facts of
-
Buffman Inc. v. Lafayette Insurance Co.
36 So. 3d 1004
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2010
Nicholas v. Allstate Insurance Company, 99-2522, pp. 8-9 (La.8/31/00), , instructs us that in addition to finding an erroneous jury instruction, we must also find that it likely contributed to the verdict before we engage in a de novo review of the jury's verdict: Louisiana jurisprudence is well established that an appellate court must exercise great restraint before it reverses a
-
Brewer v. J.B. Hunt Transport, Inc.
35 So. 3d 230
La. 2010
As did the court of appeal, we find, after a reading of the instructions in their entirety, that those instructions "`adequately provide[d] the correct principles of law' and did not mislead the jury `to the extent that it was prevented from dispensing justice.'" Adams , 07-2110 at 10, 983 So.2d at 806 , quoting Nicholas v. Allstate Insurance Company, 99-2522, p. 8 (La.8/31/00), .
-
LeBlanc v. Landry
21 So. 3d 353
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Adams , 07-2110 at p. 7, 983 So.2d at 804 ; Nicholas v. Allstate Insurance Company, 99-2522, p. 8 (La.8/31/00), .
-
Brungardt v. Summitt
7 So. 3d 879
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Co., 99-2522 (La.8/31/00), .